Cross-nested logit model for the joint choice of residential location, travel mode, and departure time

Habitat International

Volumn 38, Issue , 2013, Pages 157-166

  Yang, Liya ^a   Zheng, Guo ^a   Zhu, Xiaoning ^b  

^a RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^b BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cross Nested Logit; Departure time; GEV; Joint choice; Residential location; Travel mode

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; DECISION MAKING; DEMAND ANALYSIS; LOCATION THEORY; LOGIT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SOCIOECONOMIC SURVEY; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL TIME;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84871923495     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albert A. Mode choice for the journey to work among formal sector employees in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Transport Geography 1993, 1(4):219-229.
2. Bekhor S., Prashker J.N. GEV-based destination choice models that account for unobserved similarities among alternatives. Transportation Research B 2008, 42(3):243-262.
3. Ben-Akiva M., Francois B. mu-Homogenous generalized extreme value model 1983, Working paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Bierlaire, M. (2003). BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
5. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Ann Operation Research 2006, 144:287-300.
6. Bhat C.R. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research B 1998, 32(6):361-371.
7. Bhat C.R., Guo J.Y. A mixed spatially correlated logit model: formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research B 2004, 38(2):147-168.
8. Brown B. Modal choice, location demand, and income. Journal of Urban Economics 1986, 20:128-139.
9. Chu C.A. Paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis. Proceedings of the fifth world conference on transportation research 1989, Vol. 4:295-309. Ventura, CA.
10. Clark W.A.V., Onaka J.L. An empirical test of a joint model of residential mobility and housing choice. Environment and Planning A 1985, 17(7):915-930.
11. Daly A., Bierlaire M. A general and operational representation of generalized extreme value models. Transportation Research B 2006, 40(4):285-305.
12. Daly A.J., Zachary S. Improved multiple choice models. Determinants of travel choice 1979, Saxon House, Westmead. D.A. Hensher, M.Q. Dalvi (Eds.).
13. De Jong G., Daly A., Pieters M., Vellay C., Hofman F. A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit. Transportation Research E 2003, 29:246-268.
14. Desalvo J.S., Huq M. Mode choice, commuting cost, and urban household behavior. Journal of Regional Science 2005, 45:493-517.
15. Gabriel S.A., Rosenthal S.S. Household location and race: estimates of a multinomial logit model. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1989, 17(2):240-249.
16. Guo J.Y., Bhat C.R. Residential location choice modeling: A multinomial logit approach 2001, Technical paper, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin.
17. Hess, S. (2004). A model for the joint analysis of airport, airline, and access-mode choice for passengers departing from the San Francisco Bay area, paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
18. Hess S., Daly A., Rohr C., Hyman G. On the development of time period and mode choice models for use in large scale modeling forecasting systems. Transportation Research A 2007, 41:802-826.
19. Hess S., Polak J.W. Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: a case-study of the Greater London area. Transportation Research E 2006, 42:63-81.
20. Khattak A.J., Rodriguez D. Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: a case study in USA. Transportation Research A 2005, 39:481-500.
21. Kim J.H., Pagliara F., Preston J. The intention to move and residential location choice behaviour. Urban Studies 2005, 42(9):1621-1636.
22. Koppelman F.S., Sethi V. Closed-form discrete choice models. Handbook of transport modeling 2008, 211-225. Elsevier Science. 2nd ed. D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button (Eds.).
23. Koppelman F.S., Wen C.H. The paired combinatorial logit model: properties, estimation and application. Transportation Research Part B 2003, 4(2):75-89.
24. Lemp J.D., Kockelman K.M., Damien P. The continuous cross-nested logit model: formulation and application for departure time choice. Transportation Research B 2010, 44:646-661.
25. Lerman S.R. Location, housing, automobile ownership, and mode to work: a joint choice model. Transportation Research Record 1976, 610:6-11.
26. Leroy S.F., Sonstelie J. Paradise lost and regained: transportation innovation, income and residential location. Journal of Urban Economics 1983, 13:67-89.
27. MacFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics 1973, Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremmbka (Ed.).
28. MacFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. Transportation Research Record 1978, 672:72-77.
29. Ozbay K., Yanmaz-Tuzel O. Valuation of travel time and departure time choice in the presence of time-of-day pricing. Transportation Research Part A 2007, 42(4):577-590.
30. Papola A. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model [J]. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38:833-851.
31. Sener I.N., Pendyala R.M., Bhat C.R. Accommodating spatial correlation across choice alternatives in discrete choice models: an application to modeling residential location choice behavior. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19:294-303.
32. Small K. A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 1987, 55(2):409-424.
33. Transportation Research Board Metropolitan travel forecasting: Current practice and future direction 2007, TRB Special Report 288, Committee for Determination of the State of the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting, Washington, DC.
34. Vega A., Reynolds-Feighan A. A methodological framework for the study of residential location and travel-to-work mode choice under central and suburban employment destination patterns. Transportation Research A 2009, 43:401-419.
35. Vovsha P. The cross-nested logit model: application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1670:6-15.
36. Vovsha P., Davidson W., Donnelly R. Making the state of the art the state of the practice: advanced modeling techniques for road pricing. Proceedings of the USDOT expert forum on road pricing and travel demand modeling 2005, Alexandria, VA.
37. Waddell, P. (1996). Accessibility and residential location: the interaction of workplace, residential mobility, tenure, and location choices. Presented at the Lincoln Land Institute TRED Conference. http://www.odot%2C%20state.or.us/tddtpan/modeling.html.
38. Wafaa S. Implications of congestion charging for departure time choice: work and non-work schedule flexibility. Transportation Research A 2005, 39:773-791.
39. Weisbrod G., Lerman S., Ben-Akiva M. Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: transportation vs. other factors. Transportation Policy and Decision Making 1980, 1:13-26.
40. Wen C.H., Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research B 2001, 35:627-641.
41. Williams H. On the formation of travel demand models and economics evaluation measures of user benefits. Environment and Planning A 1977, 9:285-344.