The continuous cross-nested logit model: Formulation and application for departure time choice

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 646-661

  Lemp, Jason D ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b   Damien, Paul ^c  

^a Cambridge Systematics   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian estimation; Continuous cross nested logit; Continuous logit; Departure time modeling; Travel behavior modeling

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

BAYESIAN ESTIMATIONS; CONTINUOUS LOGIT; DEPARTURE TIME MODELS; NESTED LOGIT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR MODELING;

TRANSPORTATION;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CORRELATION; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION METHOD; LOGIT ANALYSIS; MODELING; PREDICTION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; SAN FRANCISCO BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952954537     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbe E., Bierlaire M., Toledo T. Normalization and correlation of cross-nested logit models. Transportation Research Part B 2007, 41(7):795-808.
2. Abkowitz M.D. An analysis of the commuter departure time decision. Transportation 1981, 10(3):283-297.
3. Abou-Zeid M., Rossi T.F., Gardner B. Modeling time of day choice in the context of tour and activity based models. Transportation Research Record 2006, 1981:42-49.
4. Ben-Akiva M., Bierlaire M. Discrete choice methods and their applications to short-term travel decisions. Handbook of Transportation Science 1999, 5-34. Kluwer. R. Hall (Ed.).
5. Ben-Akiva M., Watanatada T. Application of a continuous spatial choice logit model. Structural Analysis of Discrete Choice Data with Econometric Applications 1981, vol. 19:320-343. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. second ed.
6. Ben-Akiva M., Litinas N., Tsunokawa K. Continuous spatial choice: the continuous logit model and distributions of trips and urban densities. Transportation Research Part A 1985, 19(2):119-154.
7. Bhat C.R., Steed J.L. A continuous-time model of departure time choice for urban shopping trips. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(3):207-224.
8. Bierlaire M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 144(1):287-300.
9. Brownstone D., Small K.A. Valuing time and reliability: Assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transportation Research Part A 2005, 39(4):279-293.
10. Chin A.T.H. Influences on commuter trip departure time decisions in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A 1990, 24(5):321-333.
11. Daly A.J., Zachary S. Improved multiple choice models. Identifying and Measuring the Determinants of Mode Choice 1979, 335-357. Teakfield, London. D. Hensher, Q. Dalvi (Eds.).
12. de Jong G., Daly A., Pieters M., Vellay C., Bradley M., Hofman F. A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit. Transportation Research Part E 2003, 39(3):245-268.
13. Gadda Shashank., Kockelman Kara., Damien Paul. Continuous departure time models: a Bayesian approach. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2132:13-24.
14. Gamerman D., Lopes H.F. Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic Simulation for Bayesian Inference 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL. second ed.
15. Gelman A., Carlin J.B., Stern H.S., Rubin D.B. Bayesian Data Analysis 2004, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
16. Geweke J. Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments. Bayesian Statistics 4 1992, 169-193. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J.M. Bernardo, J.O. Berger, A.P. Dawid, A.F.M. Smith (Eds.).
17. Good I.J. Significance tests in parallel and in series. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1958, 53(284):799-813.
18. Hess S., Polak J.W., Daly A., Hyman G. Flexible substitution patterns in models of mode and time of day choice: new evidence from the UK and The Netherlands. Transportation 2007, 34(2):213-238.
19. Holden L., Hauge R., Holden M. Adaptive independent Metropolis-Hastings. The Annals of Applied Probability 2009, 19(1):395-413.
20. Hunt L.M., Boxall P.C., Boots B. Accommodating complex substitution patterns in a random utility model of recreational fishing. Marine Resource Economics 2007, 22(2):155-172.
21. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90(430):773-795.
22. Komma, A., Srinivasan, S., 2008. Modeling home-to-work commute-timing decisions of workers with flexible work schedules. In: Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2008, Washington, DC.
23. Lemp, J.D., 2009. Capturing Random Utility Maximization Behavior in Continuous Choice Data: Application to Work Tour Scheduling. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin.
24. Marzano V., Papola A. On the covariance structure of the cross-nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(2):83-98.
25. McCafferty D., Hall F.L. The use of multinomial logit analysis to model the choice of time to travel. Economic Geography 1982, 58(3):236-246.
26. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1973, Academic Press, New York. P. Zaremmbka (Ed.).
27. McFadden D. The mathematical theory of demand models. Behavioral Travel Demand Models 1976, 305-314. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA. P.R. Stopher, A.H. Meyburg (Eds.).
28. McFadden D. Modeling the choice of residential location. Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models 1978, 75-96. Amsterdam, North-Holland. A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snickbars, J.W. Weibull (Eds.).
29. Papola A. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(9):833-851.
30. Papola, A., Marzano, V., 2005. A specification procedure of the CNL model reproducing any homoskedastic covariance matrix. In: Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
31. Popuri Y., Ben-Akiva M., Proussaloglou K. Time of day modeling in a tour-based context: the Tel-Aviv experience. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2076:88-96.
32. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes in Pascal: The Art of Scientific Computing 1989, University Press, Cambridge.
33. Small K.A. The scheduling of consumer activities: work trips. The American Economic Review 1982, 72(3):467-479.
34. Small K.A. A discrete choice model for ordered alternatives. Econometrica 1987, 55(2):409-424.
35. Transportation Research Board, 2007. Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction. TRB Special Report 288, Committee for Determination of the State of the Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting, Washington, DC.
36. Vovsha P. Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in Tel-Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area. Transportation Research Record 1997, 1607:6-15.
37. Vovsha, P., Davidson, W., Donnelly, R., 2005. Making the state of the art the state of the practice: advanced modeling techniques for road pricing. In: Proceedings of the USDOT Expert Forum on Road Pricing and Travel Demand Modeling, November 2005, Alexandria, VA.
38. Vovsha P., Bradley M. A hybrid discrete choice departure time and duration model for scheduling travel tours. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1894:46-56.
39. Wang J.J. Timing utility of daily activities and its impact on travel. Transportation Research Part A 1996, 30(3):189-206.
40. Wen C.H., Koppelman F.S. The generalized nested logit model. Transportation Research Part B 2001, 35(7):627-641.
41. Williams H.C.W.L. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A 1977, 9(3):285-344.