Exploring the potential for cross-nesting structures in airport-choice analysis: A case-study of the Greater London area

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 63-81

  Hess, Stephane ^a   Polak, John W ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Airport choice; Cross nesting; London airports; Multinomial Logit

Indexed keywords

AIR TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESS MODE; AIR PASSENGERS; AIRPORT CHOICE; CASE-STUDIES; CROSS-NESTING; GREATER LONDON; LONDON AIRPORT; METROPOLITAN AREA; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

AIRPORTS;

AIRLINE INDUSTRY; AIRPORT; DECISION MAKING; METROPOLITAN AREA; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; LONDON [ENGLAND]; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 30044449520     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. N., Ashford, M., Bencheman, Passengers' choice of airport: An application of the Multinomial Logit model. Transportation Research Record 1147, 1987. 1-5
2. G., Basar, C.R., Bhat, A parameterized consideration set model for airport choice: An application to the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research B 38, 2004. 889-904
3. Bierlaire, M., 2003. BIOGEME: A free package for the estimation of discrete choice models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
4. Boeing, 2003. Current Market Outlook, Market Analysis, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Seattle.
5. A.S., Brooke, R.E., Caves, D.E., Pitfield, Methodology for predicting European short-haul air transport demand from regional airports: An application to East Midlands International airport. Journal of Air Transport Management 1 (1), 1994. 37-46
6. CAA, 1996. UK airports passenger survey, CAP 677 - Passengers at Birmingham, Gatwick, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester and Stansted in 1996, The Civil Aviation Authority, London.
7. CAA, 2002. UK Airport Statistics, The Civil Aviation Authority, London. Available from: .
8. A., Daly, S., Zachary, Improved multiple choice models. In: D., Hensher, M., Dalvi, (Eds.) Identifying and Measuring the Determinants of Mode Choice. 1978. Teakfields, London.
9. DfT, 1997. Air traffic forecasts for the United Kingdom 1997, Department for Transport, London.
10. DfT, 2000a. Air traffic forecasts for the United Kingdom 2000, Department for Transport, London.
11. DfT SERAS Passenger Allocation Model: An Overview of the Calibration Process 2000 Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick & Co Ltd. Basingstoke, United Kingdom
12. DfT, 2002. The future development of air transport in the UK: South East, second ed. The future development of air transport in the UK: A national consultation, Department for Transport, London.
13. DfT, 2003. The Future of Air Transport: Government White Paper, Department for Transport, United Kingdom Government, London.
14. Hess, S., 2004. A model for the joint analysis of airport, airline, and access-mode choice for passengers departing from the San Francisco Bay area, paper presented at the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
15. S., Hess, M., Bierlaire, J.W., Polak, Capturing taste heterogeneity and correlation structure with Mixed GEV models. In: A., Alberini, R., Scarpa, (Eds) Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics. 2005. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston, MA, 55-76. (Chapter 4)
16. Hess, S., Polak, J.W., 2004. On the use of discrete choice models for airport competition with applications to the San Francisco Bay area airports, paper presented at the 10th triennial World Conference on Transport Research, Istanbul.
17. S., Hess, J.W., Polak, Mixed Logit modelling of airport choice in multi-airport regions. Journal of Air Transport Management 11 (2), 2005. 59-68
18. Hess, S., Polak, J.W., 2005b. Accounting for random taste heterogeneity in airport-choice modelling, Transportation Research Record, forthcoming.
19. IATA, 2002. World air transport statistics. International Air Transport Association, Geneva.
20. D., McFadden, Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: P., Zarembka, (Eds) Frontiers in Econometrics. 1974. Academic Press, New York, pp. 105-142
21. D., McFadden, Modelling the choice of residential location. In: A. Karlqvist L. Lundqvist F., Snickars, J., Weibull, (Ed.) Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. 1978. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 75-96
22. OAG, 1996. World Airways Guide Fares Supplement 1996, Reed Elsevier, Dunstable, UK.
23. ONS, 1996. International Passenger Survey, The Office for National Statistics, London.
24. E., Pels, P., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld Airport and airline choice in a multi-airport region: An empirical analysis for the San Francisco bay area. Regional Studies 35, 2001. 1-9
25. E., Pels, P., Nijkamp, P., Rietveld Access to and competition between airports: A case study for the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research A 37, 2003. 71-83
26. Scott Wilson Kirkpatrick & Co Ltd., 1999. National airport accessibility model: Model status report. Prepared for the UK Department for Transport, Basingstoke, London.
27. R.E., Skinner, Jr., Airport choice: An empirical study. Transportation Engineering Journal 102 (4), 1976. 871-883
28. A., Thompson, R., Caves, The projected market share for a new small airport in the North of England. Regional Studies 27, 1993. 137-147
29. K., Train, Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2003. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
30. P., Vovsha, Cross-Nested Logit model: An application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area. Transportation Research Record 1607, 1997. 6-15
31. H., Williams, On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefits. Environment and Planning A9, 1977. 285-344