Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 86, Issue 1021, 2013, Pages

  Pauwels, Ruben ^a   Nackaerts, O ^a   Bellaiche, N ^b   Stamatakis, H ^c   Tsiklakis, K ^c   Walker, A ^d   Bosmans, H ^e   Bogaerts, R ^e   Jacobs, R ^a   Horner, K ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Centre Saint Germain   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^d Leeds Test Objects Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

AIR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CALIBRATION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENSITY; ERROR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BONE DENSITY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOOTH;

EID: 84871891269     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120135     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:156-72.
2. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:1-7. (Pubitemid 43309103)
3. Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN, Tözüm TF. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:716-22.
4. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:267-71.
5. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for presurgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-33.
6. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J 2008;53:S11-25.
7. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21.
8. Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A. Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:226-30.
9. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:430-6.
10. Hohlweg-Majert B, Pautke C, Deppe H, Metzger MC, Wagner K, Schulze D. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of bony structures based on DICOM dataset. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:2763-70.
11. Hohlweg-Majert B, Metzger MC, Kummer T, Schulze D. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39:330-4.
12. Bryant JA, Drage NA, Richmond S. Study of the scan uniformity from an i-CAT cone beam computed tomography dental imaging system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:365-74.
13. Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:767-71.
14. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:420-5.
15. Lagravére MO, Carey J, Ben-Zvi M, Packota GV, Major PW. Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a New Tom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:305-8.
16. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:503-6.
17. Naitoh M, Hirukawa A, Katsumata A, Ariji E. Prospective study to estimate mandibular cancellous bone density using large-volume cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1309-13.
18. Fuster-Torres MÁ, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1051-6.
19. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:829-36.
20. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:323-35.
21. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:873-9.
22. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Manousaridis G, Walker A, Michielsen K, Bosmans H, et al. Development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone-beam CT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011;12:245-60.
23. Fuh LJ, Huang HL, Chen CS, Fu KL, Shen YW, Tu MG, et al. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:346-51.
24. Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C, Ozbek EN. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:881-8. (Pubitemid 44807558)
25. Sogo M, Ikebe K, Yang TC, Wada M, Maeda Y. Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14 (Supple 1):e183-7.
26. de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:231-8.
27. Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:79-84. (Pubitemid 33723216)
28. Ribeiro-Rotta RF, Lindh C, Pereira AC, Rohlin M. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:789-801.
29. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz JM, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod 2006;32:833-7. (Pubitemid 44247132)
30. Kaya S, Yavuz I, Uysal I, Akkuş Z. Measuring bone density in healing periapical lesions by using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical investigation. J Endod 2012;38:28-31.
31. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, Lee K, Frommer H, Kottal S, et al. Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2010;36:423-8.
32. Cankaya AB, Erdem MA, Isler SC, Demircan S, Soluk M, Kasapoglu C, et al. Use of cone-beam computerized tomography for evaluation of bisphosphonate- associated osteonecrosis of the jaws in an experimental rat model. Int J Med Sci 2011;8:667-72.
33. Ordinola-Zapata R, Bramante CM, Duarte MH, Ramos Fernandes LM, Camargo EJ, de Moraes IG, et al. The influence of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographic evaluation on the assessment of periapical bone destruction in dog's teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:272-9.
34. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. Detection of periapical pathology using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - a clinical study. Int Endod J 2012;45:702-10.
35. Kumar V, Gossett L, Blattner A, Iwasaki LR, Williams K, Nickel JC. Comparison between cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral digital radiography for assessment of tooth root lesions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e533-41.
36. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265-73.
37. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, Horner K, et al. Quantification ofmetal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011. 02382.x.
38. Siltanen S, Kolehmainen V, Järvenpää S, Kaipio JP, Koistinen P, Lassas M, et al. Statistical inversion for medical x-ray tomography with few radiographs: I. General theory. Phys Med Biol 2003;48:1437-63. (Pubitemid 36700475)
39. Fanuscu MI, Chang TL. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:213-18. (Pubitemid 40109806)
40. Torres SR, Chen CS, Leroux BG, Lee PP, Hollender LG, Schubert MM. Fractal dimension evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:501-5.
41. Jiang C, Giger ML, Chinander MR, Martell JM, Kwak S, Favus MJ. Characterization of bone quality using computer-extracted radiographic features. Med Phys 1999;26:872-9. (Pubitemid 29284104)