Assessment of Bone Density in the Posterior Maxilla Based on Hounsfield Units to Enhance the Initial Stability of Implants

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

Volumn 14, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Sogo, Motofumi ^a   Ikebe, Kazunori ^a   Yang, Tsung Chieh ^a   Wada, Masahiro ^a   Maeda, Yoshinobu ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bone density; CT value; Dental implant; Hounsfield unit; Maxillary molar region; Misch's classification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SEX DIFFERENCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84860884994     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: 17088208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00423.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Becker W, Becker BE, Alsuwyed A, Al-Mubarak S. Long-term evaluation of 282 implants in maxillary and mandibular molar positions: a prospective study. J Periodontol 1999; 70:896-901.
2. Balshe AA, Eckert SE, Koka S, Assad DA, Weaver AL. The effects of smoking on the survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23:1117-1122.
3. Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:220-230.
4. Noguerol B, Munoz R, Mesa F, de Dios Luna J, O'Valle F. Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest: retrospective study of a large sample. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17:459-464.
5. Holahan CM, Wiens JL, Weaver A, Assad D, Koka S. Relationship between systemic bone mineral density and local bone quality as effectors of dental implant survival. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13:29-33.
6. Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34:267-272.
7. Khang W, Feldman S, Hawley CE, Gunsolley J. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1384-1390.
8. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, etal. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:417-423.
9. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5(Suppl 1):57-63.
10. Degidi M, Piattelli A. 7-year follow-up of 93 immediately loaded titanium dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2005; 31:25-31.
11. Misch CE. Bone density: a key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE, ed. Dental implant prosthetics. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences, 2004:130-141.
12. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12:423-432.
13. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1985:199-209.