Sex-Biased Dispersal and Adaptation to Marginal Habitats

American Naturalist

Volumn 162, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 415-426

  Kawecki, Tadeusz J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Niche evolution; Philopatry; Source sink populations

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; DISPERSAL; HABITAT QUALITY; NICHE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCE; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION; ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ALLELES; ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; MOVEMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0242456747     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/378048     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Calow, P. 1998. The encyclopedia of ecology and environmental management. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
2. Caprio, M. A., and B. E. Tabashnik. 1992. Gene flow accelerates local adaptation among finite populations: simulating the evolution of insecticide resistance. Journal of Economic Entomology 85:611-620.
3. Caswell, H. 1989. Matrix population models. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
4. Chesser, R. K. 1991. Gene diversity and female philopatry. Genetics 127:437-447.
5. Christiansen, F. B. 1975. Hard and soft selection in a sub-divided population. American Naturalist 109:11-16.
6. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:326-330.
7. Doebeli, M. 1995. Dispersal and dynamics. Theoretical Population Biology 47:82-106.
8. Gomulkiewicz, R., and R. D. Holt. 1995. When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction? Evolution 49:201-207.
9. Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 28: 1140-1162.
10. Holt, R. D. 1985. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theoretical Population Biology 28:181-208.
11. _. 1996a. Adaptive evolution in source-sink environments: direct and indirect effects of density-dependence on niche evolution. Oikos 75:182-192.
12. _. 1996b. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evolutionary Ecology 10:1-11.
13. Holt, R. D., and M. S. Gaines. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. Evolutionary Ecology 6: 433-447.
14. Karlin, S., and R. B. Campbell. 1981. The existence of a protected polymorphism under conditions of soft as opposed to hard selection in a multideme population system. American Naturalist 117:262-275.
15. Kawecki, T. J. 1995. Demography of source-sink populations and the evolution of ecological niches. Evolutionary Ecology 9:38-44.
16. _. 2000a. Adaptation to marginal habitats: contrasting influence of dispersal on the fate of rare alleles with small and large effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 267:1315-1320.
17. _. 2000b. The evolution of genetic canalization under fluctuating selection. Evolution 54:1-12.
18. Kawecki, T. J., and R. D. Holt. 2002. Evolutionary consequences of asymmetric dispersal rates. American Naturalist 160:333-347.
19. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
20. Liberman, U. 1988. External stability and ESS: criteria for initial increase of new mutant allele. Journal of Mathematical Biology 26:477-485.
21. Perrin, N., and V. Mazalov. 1999. Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance. American Naturalist 154:282-292.
22. Ronce, O., and M. Kirkpatrick. 2001. When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution 55:1520-1531.
23. Shpak, M., and A. S. Kondrashov. 1999. Applicability of the hypergeometric phenotypic model to haploid and diploid populations. Evolution 53:600-604.
24. Wolfram, S. 1996. Mathematica. Version 3.0. Wolfram Media, Champaign, Ill.