Style persistence, pollen limitation, and seed set in the common prairie plant Echinacea angustifolia (Asteraceae)

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 165, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 595-603

  Wagenius, Stuart ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

Echinacea; Fecundity; Pollen limitation; Pollination; Prairie; Reproductive success; Style persistence

Indexed keywords

POLLEN; POLLINATION; PRAIRIE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEED SET;

ASTERACEAE; ECHINACEA (ASTERACEAE); ECHINACEA ANGUSTIFOLIA; ECHINACEA PURPUREA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 4944266741     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/386376     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aizen MA, P Feinsinger 1994 Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75: 330-351.
2. Baker AM, SCH Barrett, JD Thompson 2000 Variation of pollen limitation in the early flowering Mediterranean geophyte Narcissus assoanus (Amaryllidaceae). Oecologia 124:529-535.
3. Barrett SCH, LD Harder 1996 Ecology and evolution of plant mating. Trends Ecol Evol 11:73-79.
4. Baskauf CJ 1993 Comparative population genetics and ecophysiology of a rare and a widespread species of Echinacea (Asteraceae). PhD diss. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.
5. Bosch M, NM Waser 1999 Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am J Bot 86:871-879.
6. _ 2001 Experimental manipulation of plant density and its effect on pollination and reproduction of two confamilial montane herbs. Oecologia 126:76-83.
7. Burd M 1994 Bateman's principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot Rev 60:83-139.
8. _ 1995 Pollinator behavioural responses to reward size in Lobelia deckenii: no escape from pollen limitation of seed set. J Ecol 83:865-872.
9. Byers DL 1995 Pollen quantity and quality as explanations for low seed set in small populations exemplified by Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 82:1000-1006.
10. Byers DL, TR Meagher 1992 Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility. Heredity 68:353-359.
11. Calvo RN, C Horvitz 1990 Pollinator limitation, cost of reproduction, and fitness in plants: a transition matrix demographic approach. Am Nat 136:499-516.
12. Campbell DR 1985 Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination. Evolution 39:418-431.
13. _ 1987 Interpopulational variation in fruit production: role of pollination limitation in the Olympic mountains. Am J Bot 74:269-273.
14. Campbell DR, KJ Halama 1993 Resource and pollen limitations to lifetime seed production in a natural plant population. Ecology 74:1043-1051.
15. DeMauro MM 1993 Relationship of breeding system to rarity in the lakeside daisy (Hymenoxys acaulis var. glabra). Conserv Biol 7:542-550.
16. Dudash MR 1993 Variation in pollen limitation between individuals of Sabatia angularis. Ecology 74:959-962.
17. Dudash MR, CB Fenster 1997 Multiyear study of pollen limitation and cost of reproduction in the iteroparous Silene virginica. Ecology 78:484-493.
18. Ehrlen J, O Eriksson 1995 Pollen limitation and population growth in a herbaceous perennial legume. Ecology 76:652-656.
19. Feghahati SMJ, RN Reese 1994 Ethylene-, light-, and prechill-enhanced germination of Echinacea angustifolia seeds. J Am Soc Hort Sci 119:853-858.
20. Feinsinger P, HM Tiebout III 1991 Competition among plants sharing hummingbird pollinators: laboratory experiments on a mechanism. Ecology 72:1946-1952.
21. Feinsinger P, HM Tiebout III, BE Young 1991 Do tropical bird-pollinated plants exhibit density dependent interactions? field experiments. Ecology 72:1953-1963.
22. Franke R, R Schenk, J Schaser, A Nagell 1997 Einfluss von Anbaumassnahmen auf Ertrag und Inhaltsstoffe von Echinacea pallida (Nutt.) Nutt. Z Arznei Gewurzpflanzen 2:173-185.
23. Galen C 1985 Regulation of seed-set in Polemonium viscosum: floral scents, pollination, and resources. Ecology 66:792-797.
24. Goodwillie C 2001 Pollen limitation and the evolution of self-compatibility in Linanthus (Polemoniaceae). Int J Plant Sci 162:1283-1292.
25. Griffin SR, SCH Barrett 2002 Factors affecting low seed : ovule ratios in a spring woodland herb, Trillium grandiflorum (Melanthiaceae). Int J Plant Sci 163:581-590.
26. Groom M 1998 Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am Nat 151:487-496.
27. Heithaus ER, E Stashko, PK Anderson 1982 Cumulative effects of plant-animal interactions on seed production in Bauhinia ungulata, a neotropical legume. Ecology 63:1294-1302.
28. Hendrix SD, JF Kyhl 2000 Population size and reproduction in Phlox pilosa. Conserv Biol 14:304-313.
29. House SM 1992 Population density and fruit set in three dioecious tree species in Australian tropical rain forest. J Ecol 80:57-69.
30. Inouye DW, DE Gill, MR Dudash, CB Fenster 1994 A model and lexicon for pollen fate. Am J Bot 81:1517-1530.
31. Jennersten O 1988 Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359-366.
32. Johnson SD, WJ Bond 1997 Evidence for widespread pollen limitation of fruiting success in Cape wildflowers. Oecologia 109:530-534.
33. Johnston MO 1991 Pollen limitation of female reproduction in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Ecology 72:1500-1503.
34. Krombein KV, JPD Hurd, DR Smith, BD Burks, eds 1979 Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Vol 2. Apocrita (Aculeata). Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 1012 pp.
35. Kunin WE 1993 Sex and the single mustard: population density and pollinator behavior effects on seed-set. Ecology 74:2145-2160.
36. Larson BMH, SCH Barrett 2000 A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants. Biol J Linn Soc 69:503-520.
37. Leuszler HK, VJ Tepedino, DG Alston 1996 Reproductive biology of purple coneflower in southwestern North Dakota. Prairie Nat 28:91-102.
38. McGregor RL 1968 The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). Univ Kans Sci Bull 48:113-142.
39. Melampy MN, AM Hayworth 1980 Seed production and pollen vectors in several nectarless plants. Evolution 34:1144-1154.
40. Mitchell RJ 1994 Effects of floral traits, pollinator visitation, and plant size on Ipomopsis aggregata fruit production. Am Nat 143:870-889.
41. Molano-Flores B, SD Hendrix 1999 The effects of population size and density on the reproductive output of Anemone canadensis L. (Ranunculaceae). Int J Plant Sci 160:759-766.
42. Parker IM 1997 Pollinator limitation of Cytisus scoparius (Scotch broom), an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78:1457-1470.
43. Paschke M, C Abs, B Schmid 2002 Effects of population size and pollen diversity on reproductive success and offspring size in the narrow endemic Cochlearia bavarica (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 89: 1250-1259.
44. Rathcke BJ, ES Jules 1993 Habitat fragmentation and plant-pollinator interactions. Curr Sci 65:273-277.
45. SAS Institute 2002 JMP, version 5.0.1a. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.
46. Sih A, MS Baltus 1987 Patch size, pollinator behavior, and pollinator limitation in catnip. Ecology 68:1679-1690.
47. Young A, T Boyle, T Brown 1996 The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11:413-418.
48. Young HJ, TP Young 1992 Alternative outcomes of natural and experimental high pollen loads. Ecology 73:639-647.
49. Zimmerman M, GH Pyke 1988 Reproduction in Polemonium: assessing factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131:723-738.