Patient-specific total knee arthroplasty: A novel technique and implant

Techniques in Knee Surgery

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 182-188

  Palumbo, Brian T ^a   Lindsey, Joshua ^a   Fitz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

computer tomography (CT); ITotal; patient specific implants; patient specific instrumentation; total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CANE; CRUTCH; FEMUR; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE IMPLANT; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PATELLA; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 84871863988     PISSN: 15360636     EISSN: 15381935     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BTK.0b013e31827db337     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR, et al. Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2072-2078.
2. Argenson JN, Parratte S, Ashour A, et al. The outcome of rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty with cement at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:638-644.
3. Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:889-895.
4. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:426-432.
5. Robinson RP. The early innovators of today's resurfacing condylar knees. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(1 suppl 1):2-26. (Pubitemid 40093632)
6. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1115-1121.
7. Ha CW, Na SE. The correctness of fit of current total knee prostheses compared with intra-operative anthropometric measurements in Korean knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94: 638-641.
8. van den Heever DJ, Scheffer C, Erasmus P, et al. Classification of gender and race in the distal femur using self organising maps. Knee. 2012;19:488-492.
9. Shetty GM, Mullaji A, Lingaraju AP, et al. How accurate are orthopaedic surgeons in visually estimating lower limb alignment? Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:638-643.
10. Lutzner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, et al. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1039-1044.
11. Watters TS, Mather RC III, Browne JA, et al. Analysis of procedurerelated costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20:112-116.
12. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:387-393.
13. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:99-107.
14. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:895-902.