Classification of gender and race in the distal femur using self organising maps

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 488-492

  van den Heever, David J ^a   Scheffer, Cornie ^a   Erasmus, Pieter ^b   Dillon, Edwin ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b Stellenbosch Medi clinic   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Female knee; Gender specific implant; Knee arthroplasty; Morphometrical measurement; Self organising map

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR SHAFT; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF ORGANISING MAP; SEX DETERMINATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 84861682098     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Dargel J., Michael J.W.P., Feiser J., Ivo R., Koebke J. Human knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(3):342-345.
2. Guy S.P., Farndon M.A., Sidhom S., Al-Lami M., Bennett C., London N.J. Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: a prospective clinical study. Knee 2012, 19(1):28-31.
3. Greene K.A. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7):27-31.
4. Merchant A.C., Arendt E.A., Dye S.F., Fredericson M., Grelsamer R.P., Leadbetter W.B., et al. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Ortho Relat Res 2008, 466:3059-3065.
5. Conley S., Rosenberg A., Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15:31-36.
6. Ho W.P., Cheng C.K., Liau J.J. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee 2006, 13:12-14.
7. Yu B., Varadarajan K.M., Ai S., Tang T., Rubash H.E., Li G. Differences of knee anthropometry between Chinese and White men and women. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(1):124-130.
8. Cheng F.B., Ji X.F., Lai Y., Feng J.C., Zheng W.X., Sun Y.F., et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee ot design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee 2009, 16:341-347.
9. Kwak D.S., Surendran S., Pengatteeri Y.H., Park S.E., Choi K.N., Gopinathan P., et al. Morphometry of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee replacement for the Korean population. Knee 2007, 14:295-300.
10. Chaichankul C., Tanavalee A., Itiravivong P. Anthropometric measurements of knee joints in Thai population: correlation to the sizing of current knee prostheses. Knee 2011, 18:5-10.
11. Seedhom B.B., Longton E.B., Wright V., Dowson D. Dimensions of the knee: radiographic and autopsy study of sizes required for a knee prosthesis. Ann Rheum Dis 1972, 31:54-58.
12. Kohonen T. The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 1998, 21:1-6.
13. Brooks P. Seven cuts to the perfect total knee 2008, Current Concepts in Joint Replacement, Orlando, Florida.
14. Kosel J., Giouroudi I., Scheffer C., Dillon E., Erasmus P. Anatomical study of the radius and center of curvature of the distal femoral condyle. J Biomech Eng 2010, 2010:91002-91007.
15. Dow L.K., Kalelkar S., Dow E.R. Self-organising maps for the analysis of NMR spectra. Drug Discov Today 2004, 2(4):157-163.
16. Chang R.I., Chu C.C., Wu Y.Y., Chen Y.L. Gene clustering by using query-based self-organising maps. Expert Syst Appl 2004, 37(9):6689-6694.
17. Barton G., Lisboa P., Lees A., Attfield S. Gait quality assessment using self-organising artificial neural networks. Gait Posture 2007, 25(3):374-379.
18. Scheffer C., Cloete T. Inertial motion capture in conjunction with an artificial neural network can differentiate the gait patterns of hemiparetic stroke patients compared to able-bodied counterparts. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2012, 15(3):285-294.
19. Busch A.C., Scheffer C., Basson A.H. Development and testing of a prototype reflex measurement sstem employing artificial neural networks. Comput Meth Prog Bio 2009, 94:15-25.
20. Hitt K., Shurman J.R., Greene K., McCarthy J., Moskal J., Hoeman T., et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85:115-122.
21. Lewontin R.C. The apoortionment of human diversity. Evol Biol 1972, 6:391-398.
22. Relethford J.H., Harpending H.C. Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 1994, 95:249-270.
23. Barbujani G., Magagni A., Minch E., Cavalli-Sforza L.L. An apportionment of human DNA diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:4516-4519.
24. Bowcock A.M., Ruiz-Linares A., Tomfohrde J., Minch E., Kidd J.R., Cavalli-Sforza L.L. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 1994, 368:455-457.
25. Jorde L.B., Watkins W.S., Bamshad M.J., Dixon M.E., Richer C.E., Seielstad M.T., et al. The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data. Am J Hum Genet 2000, 66:979-988.
26. Xing J., Watkins W.S., Shlien A., Walker E., Huff C.D., Witherspoon D.J., et al. Towards a more uniform sampling of human genetic diversity: a survey of worldwide populations by high-density genotyping. Genomics 2010, 96:199-210.