Ten-year follow-up of a rotating-platform, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 426-432

  Meftah, Morteza ^a   Ranawat, Amar S ^a   Ranawat, Chitranjan S ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DISEASE; CREPITATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMERUS SUPRACONDYLAR FRACTURE; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RADIOGRAPHY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 84858603440     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00152     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Vessely MB, Whaley AL, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: long-term survivorship and failure modes of 1000 cemented condylar total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:28-34. (Pubitemid 44690638)
2. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Cervieri CL, Rodriguez JA. The press-fit condylar modular total knee system with a posterior cruciate-substituting design. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1006-10.
3. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79-86. (Pubitemid 28007489)
4. O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1362-71. (Pubitemid 35407581)
5. Hooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C. The low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective study with aminimum follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:58-63.
6. Rossi R, Ferro A, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Garzaro G, Castoldi F. NexGen LPS rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a prospective study. Chir Organi Mov. 2009;93:65-70.
7. Szivek JA, Anderson PL, Benjamin JB. Average and peak contact stress distribution evaluation of total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:952-63. (Pubitemid 27014858)
8. Blunn GW, Walker PS, Joshi A, Hardinge K. The dominance of cyclic sliding in producing wear in total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;273:253-60.
9. McEwen HM, Fisher J, Goldsmith AA, Auger DD, Hardaker C, Stone MH. Wear of fixed bearing and rotating platform mobile bearing knees subjected to high levels of internal and external tibial rotation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:1049-52. (Pubitemid 34062134)
10. Most E, Li G, Schule S, Sultan P, Park SE, Zayontz S, Rubash HE. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:197-207. (Pubitemid 37413640)
11. D'Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell CW Jr. Comparison between the kinematics of fixed and rotating bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;380:151-7.
12. D'Lima DD, Trice M, Urquhart AG, Colwell CW Jr. Tibiofemoral conformity and kinematics of rotating-bearing knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:235-42. (Pubitemid 32391300)
13. Buechel FF Sr. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:40-50.
14. Stiehl JB, Hamelynck KJ, Voorhorst PE. International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2006;30:190-9. (Pubitemid 44324076)
15. Kim TK, Cho HJ, Kang YG, Kim SJ, Chang CB. Improved early clinical outcomes of RP/PS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2901-10.
16. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Murray DW, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Dorr LD. Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1020-41.
17. Buechel FF. Mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty: rotation is our salvation! J Arthroplasty. 2004;19(4 Suppl. 1):27-30. (Pubitemid 38746712)
18. Ranawat CS, Komistek RD, Rodriguez JA, Dennis DA, Anderle M. In vivo kinematic analysis for subjects having either fixed or mobile bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:184-90. (Pubitemid 38140443)
19. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA. In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:60-6. (Pubitemid 28007487)
20. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1016-21.
21. Ranawat CS, Komistek RD, Rodriguez JA, Dennis DA, Anderle M. In vivo kinematics for fixed and mobile-bearing posterior stabilized knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;418:184-90. (Pubitemid 38140443)
22. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-40. (Pubitemid 19037656)
23. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:13-4. (Pubitemid 20204775)
24. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The natural history of anterior knee pain in 2 posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1145-8. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
25. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Safety and efficacy of a rotating-platform, high-flexion knee design three- to five-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2011 May 27 [Epub ahead of print].
26. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12. (Pubitemid 20204774)
27. Maniar R. Rationale for the posterior-stabilized rotating-platform knee. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 Suppl):S23-7. (Pubitemid 44468682)
28. Hanusch B, Lou TN, Warriner G, Hui A, Gregg P. Functional outcome of PFC Sigma fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop. 2010;34:349-54.
29. Rahman WA, Garbuz DS, Masri BA. Randomized controlled trial of radiographic and patient-assessed outcomes following fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1201-8.
30. Harrington MA, Hopkinson WJ, Hsu P, Manion L. Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: does it make a difference? - a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):24-7.
31. Cho HJ, Chang CB, Kim TK. Comparison of clinical outcomes between floating-platform and rotating-platform posterior stabilized mobile-bearing in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(Suppl B):158-9.
32. Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, Schafroth MU, Blankevoort L, Schaap GR, van Dijk CN. Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1959-65.
33. Popovic N, Lemaire R. Anterior knee pain with a posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing knee prosthesis: the effect of femoral component design. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:396-400. (Pubitemid 36750107)
34. Smith AJ, Lloyd DG, Wood DJ. Pre-surgery knee joint loading patterns during walking predict the presence and severity of anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:260-6. (Pubitemid 38155280)
35. Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS, Slamin JE, Dennis DA. Patellar crepitation in the P.F.C. sigma total knee system. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 Suppl):S68-70. (Pubitemid 44468693)
36. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The natural history of anterior knee pain in two posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:1145-8.
37. Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:46-55. (Pubitemid 33054928)
38. Anderson MJ, Becker DL, Kieckbusch T. Patellofemoral complications after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of 2 different implant designs. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:422-6. (Pubitemid 34663258)
39. Ip D, Wu WC, Tsang WL. Early results of posterior-stabilised NexGen Legacy total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003;11:38-42. (Pubitemid 36999107)
40. Maloney WJ, Schmidt R, Sculco TP. Femoral component design and patellar clunk syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;410:199-202. (Pubitemid 36538563)
41. Callaghan JJ, Wells CW, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1635-9.
42. Thompson NW, Wilson DS, Cran GW, Beverland DE, Stiehl JB. Dislocation of the rotating platform after low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;425:207-11. (Pubitemid 39062771)
43. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, Zikria BA, Zikria JF, Ranawat CS. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics. 2006;29:S49-S52. (Pubitemid 44468688)
44. Jones RE. High-flexion rotating-platform knees: rationale, design, and patient selection. Orthopedics. 2006;29(9 Suppl):S76-9. (Pubitemid 44468695)
45. Cooper JH, Ranawat AS, Koob T, Foo LF, Potter HG, Ranawat CS. MRI for comparison of particle disease between a fixed-bearing and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:160.
46. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. New Zealand Joint Registry. http://www.cdhb.govt.nz/njr. Accessed 2010 Jul.