Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: A meta-analysis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 889-895

  Gandhi, R ^a,b   Tsvetkov, D ^a,b   Davey, J R ^a,b   Mahomed, N N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ARTICLE; ASEPTIC LOOSENING; BONE PROSTHESIS; CEMENT BONE PROSTHESIS; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FIXATION FAILURE; FRACTURE FIXATION; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE DISLOCATION; KNEE FUNCTION; META ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLA DISLOCATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK; SEPSIS; SOCIETY; SUBLUXATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCEMENT BONE PROSTHESIS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CEMENTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67650116261     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21702     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Lombardi AV Jr, Berasi CC, Berend KR. Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):25-9.
2. Bauer TW, Schils J. The pathology of total joint arthroplasty. I: mechanisms of implant fixation. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:423-32.
3. Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty: current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop 1992;276:26-32.
4. Gicquel P, Kempf JF, Gastaud F, Schlemmer B, Bonnomet F. Comparative study of fixation mode in total knee arthroplasty with preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2000;86:240-249 (in French). (Pubitemid 30367672)
5. Naudie DD, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA, Rorabeck CH. Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:53-64.
6. O'Rourke MR, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Osteolysis associated with a cemented modular posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee design: five to eight-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:1362-1371 (Pubitemid 35407581)
7. Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Bertin KC. Freeman-Samuelson total arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 1985;192:46-58. (Pubitemid 15166109)
8. Lewis G. Properties of acrylic bone cement: state of the art review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 1999;38:155-182
9. Bassett RW. Results of 1,000 performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty 1998;13:409-413 (Pubitemid 28270399)
10. Nolan JF, Bucknill TM. Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:23-24
11. Berry DJ, Wold LE, Rand JA. Extensive osteolysis around an aseptic, stable, uncemented total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 1993;293:204-207 (Pubitemid 23242869)
12. Albrektsson BE, Carlsson LV, Freeman MA, Herberts P, Ryd L. Proximally cemented versus uncemented Freeman-Samuelson knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:233-238
13. Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Morris RW, Gregg PJ. A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002;84-B:658-666
14. Rand JA. Cement or cementless fixation in total arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 1991;273:52-62.
15. Dodd CA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA. Total knee arthroplasty fixation: comparison of the early results of paired cemented versus uncemented porous coated anatomic knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 1990;260:66-70. (Pubitemid 20381519)
16. McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP, et al. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:971-975 (Pubitemid 28528397)
17. Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Galante JO. Cemented and ingrowth fixation of the Miller-Galante prosthesis: clinical and roentgenographic comparison after three- to six-year follow-up studies. Clin Orthop 1990;260:71-79 (Pubitemid 20381520)
18. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14. (Pubitemid 20204775)
19. Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J. A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1976;58-A:754-765
20. No authors listed. PubMed MEDLINE. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ (date last accessed 4 December 2008).
21. No authors listed. Ovid MEDLINE. http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/spa/ovidweb. cgi?New+Database=single/21&S=ICAJFBPOBIDDHOLLNCFLOAJLEDKAAOO (date last accessed 4 December 2008).
22. No authors listed. Embase. http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/spa/ovidweb.cgi? New+Database=single/13&S=ICAJFPBOBIDDHOLLNCFLOAJLEDKJAAOO (date last accessed 4 December 2008).
23. No authors listed. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. http:// www.cochrane.org (date last accessed 4 December 2008).
24. No authors listed. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/cochrane-clcentral-articles-fs. html (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
25. No authors listed. Clinicaltrials.gov http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
26. No authors listed. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2001 to 2008) http://www.aaos.org. (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
27. No authors listed. Knee Society. http://www.kneesociety.org (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
28. No authors listed. Canadian Orthopaedic Association. http://www.coa-aco. org/ (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
29. No authors listed. British Orthopaedic Association. http://www.boa.ac.uk/ (date last accessed 16 May 2008).
30. Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbe KA. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:255-265
31. Deeks MJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ. Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. London: BMJ, 2001:285-312.
32. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press, 1985:108-138
33. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560 (Pubitemid 37088507)
34. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634 (Pubitemid 27387172)
35. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719-748
36. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188 (Pubitemid 17189972)
37. Pecina M, Djapic T, Haspl M. Survival of cementless and cemented porous-coated anatomic knee replacements: retrospective cohort study. Croat Med J 2000;41:168-172 (Pubitemid 30411789)
38. Collins DN, Heim SA, Nelson CL, Smith P 3rd. Porous-coated anatomic total knee arthroplasty: a prospective analysis comparing cemented and cementless fixation. Clin Orthop 1991;267:128-136
39. Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998;356:66-72. (Pubitemid 29019473)
40. Nilsson KG, Bjornebrink J, Hietala SO, Karrholm J. Scintimetry after total knee arthroplasty: prospective 2-year study of 18 cases of arthrosis and 15 cases of rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop Scand 1992;63:159-165
41. Nilsson KG, Karrholm J. Increased varus-valgus tilting of screw-fixated knee prostheses: stereoradiographic study of uncemented versus cemented tibial components. J Arthroplasty 1993;8:529-540 (Pubitemid 23306293)
42. Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Nott L. The cemented kinematic-II and the non-cemented porous-coated anatomic prostheses for total knee replacement: a prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988;70-A:483-490 (Pubitemid 18126404)
43. Gioe TJ, Novak C, Sinner P, Ma W, Mehle S. Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop 2007;464:83-87 (Pubitemid 350059950)
44. Cloke DJ, Khatri M, Pinder IM, McCaskie AW, Lingard EA. 284 press-fit Kinemax total knee arthroplasties followed for 10 years: poor survival of uncemented prostheses. Acta Orthop 2008;79:28-33. (Pubitemid 351271879)
45. Barrack RL, Nakamura SJ, Hopkins SG, Rosenzweig S. Early failure of cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(Suppl 2):101-106
46. Freeman MA, Tennant R. The scientific basis of cement versus cementless fixation. Clin Orthop 1992;276:19-25.
47. Onsten I, Nordqvist A, Carlsson AS, Besjakov J, Shott S. Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components: a randomised RSA study in 116 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80-B:417-425 (Pubitemid 128472119)
48. Nilsson KG, Karrholm J, Carlsson L, Dalen T. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:9-20. (Pubitemid 29042738)
49. Chiu FY, Chen CM, Lin CFJ, Lo WH. Cefuroxime impregnanted cement in primary total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:759-62.
50. Chiu FY, Lin CF, Chen CM, Lo WH, Chaung TY. Cefuroxime-impregnated cement at primary total knee arthroplasty in diabetes mellitus: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:691-695
51. Beaupre LA, al-Yamani M, Huckell JR, Johnston DW. Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:2204-2211
52. Gioe TJ, Killeen K, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop 2004;428:100-106 (Pubitemid 39506159)
53. No authors listed. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual report. 30th ed. Sweden: Lund University Hospital, 2004.
54. Callaghan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1994;271:1349-1357 (Pubitemid 24132462)
55. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop 2002;404:7-13. (Pubitemid 35351042)
56. Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001;392:315-318 (Pubitemid 33054961)
57. Epinette JA, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: clinical experience at 10 to 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:34-38
58. Uvehammer J, Karrholm J, Carlsson L. Cemented versus hydroxyapatite fixation of the femoral component of the Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement: a radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:39-44.
59. Helm AT, Kerin C, Ghalayini SR, McLauchlan GJ. Preliminary results of an uncemented trabecular metal tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008;Epub.
60. Bhandari M, Morrow F, Kulkarni AV, Tornetta P. Meta-analysis in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of the methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:15-24. (Pubitemid 32116103)
61. Laskin RS. Session III: total knee replacement in young patients. Clin Orthop 2002;404:100-101
62. Ritter MA. Session I: long-term follow-up after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2002;404:32-33 (Pubitemid 35351045)
63. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Past incidence and future need for knee arthroplasty in Sweden: a report from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register regarding the affect of past and future population changes on the number of arthroplasties performed. Acta Orthp Scand 2000;71:376-380 (Pubitemid 30683107)