Reciprocal interaction between TRAF6 and Notch signaling regulates adult myofiber regeneration upon injury

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 23, 2012, Pages 4833-4845

  Hindi, Sajedah M ^a   Paul, Pradyut K ^a   Dahiya, Saurabh ^a,d   Mishra, Vivek ^a,e   Bhatnagar, Shephali ^a   Kuang, Shihuan ^b   Choi, Yongwon ^c   Kumar, Ashok ^a  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMMUNOGLOBULIN ENHANCER BINDING PROTEIN; NOTCH RECEPTOR; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR RECEPTOR ASSOCIATED FACTOR 6;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EX VIVO STUDY; EXPLANT; HEART MUSCLE CELL; MACROPHAGE; MOUSE; MUSCLE REGENERATION; MUSCLE TISSUE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SATELLITE CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOKINES; GENE DELETION; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MUSCLE FIBERS, SKELETAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NF-KAPPA B; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; REGENERATION; SATELLITE CELLS, SKELETAL MUSCLE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TNF RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATED FACTOR 6;

MUS;

EID: 84871856349     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00717-12     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Acharyya S, et al. 2010. TNF inhibits Notch-1 in skeletal muscle cells by Ezh2 and DNA methylation mediated repression: implications in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. PLoS One 5:e12479. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012479.
2. Acharyya S, et al. 2007. Interplay of IKK/NF-kappaB signaling in macrophages and myofibers promotes muscle degeneration in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Clin. Invest. 117:889-901.
3. Akira S, Takeda K. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:499-511.
4. Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ. 1999. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 284:770-776.
5. Baeza-Raja B, Munoz-Canoves P. 2004. p38 MAPK-induced nuclear factor-kappaB activity is required for skeletal muscle differentiation: role of interleukin-6. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:2013-2026.
6. Beauchamp JR, et al. 2000. Expression of CD34 and Myf5 defines the majority of quiescent adult skeletal muscle satellite cells. J. Cell Biol. 151: 1221-1234.
7. Bjornson CR, et al. 2012. Notch signaling is necessary to maintain quiescence in adult muscle stem cells. Stem Cells 30:232-242.
8. Buas MF, Kadesch T. 2010. Regulation of skeletal myogenesis by Notch. Exp. Cell Res. 316:3028-3033.
9. Burkin DJ, Kaufman SJ. 1999. The alpha7beta1 integrin in muscle development and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 296:183-190.
10. Carlson ME, Hsu M, Conboy IM. 2008. Imbalance between pSmad3 and Notch induces CDK inhibitors in old muscle stem cells. Nature 454:528-532.
11. Charge SB, Rudnicki MA. 2004. Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiol. Rev. 84:209-238.
12. Chung JY, Lu M, Yin Q, Lin SC, Wu H. 2007. Molecular basis for the unique specificity of TRAF6. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 597:122-130.
13. Chung JY, Park YC, Ye H, Wu H. 2002. All TRAFs are not created equal: common and distinct molecular mechanisms of TRAF-mediated signal transduction. J. Cell Sci. 115:679-688.
14. Conboy IM, Conboy MJ, Smythe GM, Rando TA. 2003. Notchmediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle. Science 302:1575-1577.
15. Conboy IM, et al. 2005. Rejuvenation of aged progenitor cells by exposure to a young systemic environment. Nature 433:760-764.
16. Conboy IM, Rando TA. 2002. The regulation of Notch signaling controls satellite cell activation and cell fate determination in postnatal myogenesis. Dev. Cell 3:397-409.
17. Dahiya S, et al. 2011. Elevated levels of active matrix metalloproteinase-9 cause hypertrophy in skeletal muscle of normal and dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20:4345-4359.
18. Dhawan J, Rando TA. 2005. Stem cells in postnatal myogenesis: molecular mechanisms of satellite cell quiescence, activation and replenishment. Trends Cell Biol. 15:666-673.
19. Ehebauer M, Hayward P, Arias AM. 2006. Notch, a universal arbiter of cell fate decisions. Science 314:1414-1415.
20. Espinosa L, Ingles-Esteve J, Robert-Moreno A, Bigas A. 2003. Ikappa-Balpha and p65 regulate the cytoplasmic shuttling of nuclear corepressors: cross-talk between Notch and NFkappaB pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 14: 491-502.
21. Fukada S, et al. 2011. Hesr1 and Hesr3 are essential to generate undifferentiated quiescent satellite cells and to maintain satellite cell numbers. Development 138:4609-4619.
22. Guan E, et al. 1996. T cell leukemia-associated human Notch/translocation-associated Notch homologue has I kappa B-like activity and physically interacts with nuclear factor-kappa B proteins in T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:2025-2032.
23. Guttridge DC, Mayo MW, Madrid LV, Wang CY, and Baldwin AS, Jr. 2000. NF-kappaB-induced loss of MyoD messenger RNA: possible role in muscle decay and cachexia. Science 289:2363-2366.
24. Hayden MS, Ghosh S. 2004. Signaling to NF-kappaB. Genes Dev. 18: 2195-2224.
25. Iso T, Kedes L, Hamamori Y. 2003. HES and HERP families: multiple effectors of the Notch signaling pathway. J. Cell. Physiol. 194:237-255.
26. Jones NC, et al. 2005. The p38alpha/beta MAPK functions as a molecular switch to activate the quiescent satellite cell. J. Cell Biol. 169:105-116.
27. Kitamoto T, Hanaoka K. 2010. Notch3 null mutation in mice causes muscle hyperplasia by repetitive muscle regeneration. Stem Cells 28:2205-2216.
28. Kobayashi T, et al. 2003. TRAF6 is a critical factor for dendritic cell maturation and development. Immunity 19:353-363.
29. Kopan R, Ilagan MX. 2009. The canonical Notch signaling pathway: unfolding the activation mechanism. Cell 137:216-233.
30. Kuang S, Charge SB, Seale P, Huh M, Rudnicki MA. 2006. Distinct roles for Pax7 and Pax3 in adult regenerative myogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 172:103-113.
31. Kuang S, Kuroda K, Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. 2007. Asymmetric self-renewal and commitment of satellite stem cells in muscle. Cell 129: 999-1010.
32. Kuang S, Rudnicki MA. 2008. The emerging biology of satellite cells and their therapeutic potential. Trends Mol. Med. 14:82-91.
33. Kumar A, Bhatnagar S, Kumar A. 2010. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor batimastat alleviates pathology and improves skeletal muscle function in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Am. J. Pathol. 177:248-260.
34. Lamar E, et al. 2001. Nrarp is a novel intracellular component of the Notch signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 15:1885-1899.
35. Lamothe B, et al. 2007. Site-specific Lys-63-linked tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 auto-ubiquitination is a critical determinant of I kappa B kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:4102-4112.
36. Le Grand F, Rudnicki MA. 2007. Skeletal muscle satellite cells and adult myogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19:628-633.
37. Li H, Malhotra S, Kumar A. 2008. Nuclear factor-kappa B signaling in skeletal muscle atrophy. J. Mol. Med. 86:1113-1126.
38. Mantovani A, et al. 2004. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 25:677-686.
39. Mason NJ, et al. 2004. TRAF6-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase activation differentially regulates the production of interleukin-12 by macrophages in response to Toxoplasma gondii. Infect. Immun. 72: 5662-5667.
40. Mittal A, et al. 2010. The TWEAK-Fn14 system is a critical regulator of denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in mice. J. Cell Biol. 188: 833-849.
41. Mittal A, et al. 2010. Genetic ablation of TWEAK augments regeneration and post-injury growth of skeletal muscle in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 177: 1732-1742.
42. Mourikis P, et al. 2012. A critical requirement for notch signaling in maintenance of the quiescent skeletal muscle stem cell state. Stem Cells 30:243-252.
43. Mourkioti F, et al. 2006. Targeted ablation of IKK2 improves skeletal muscle strength, maintains mass, and promotes regeneration. J. Clin. Invest. 116:2945-2954.
44. Mourkioti F, Rosenthal N. 2005. IGF-1, inflammation and stem cells: interactions during muscle regeneration. Trends Immunol. 26:535-542.
45. Mueck T, et al. 2011. TRAF6 regulates proliferation and differentiation of skeletal myoblasts. Res. Biol. Divers. 81:99-106.
46. Nakagawa O, et al. 2000. Members of the HRT family of basic helix-loophelix proteins act as transcriptional repressors downstream of Notch signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:13655-13660.
47. Oswald F, Liptay S, Adler G, Schmid RM. 1998. NF-kappaB2 is a putative target gene of activated Notch-1 via RBP-Jkappa. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2077-2088.
48. Paul PK, et al. 2012. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6 intercedes in starvation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy through multiple mechanisms. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32:1248-1259.
49. Paul PK, et al. 2010. Targeted ablation of TRAF6 inhibits skeletal muscle wasting in mice. J. Cell Biol. 191:1395-1411.
50. Pelosi L, et al. 2007. Local expression of IGF-1 accelerates muscle regeneration by rapidly modulating inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. FASEB J. 21:1393-1402.
51. Perdiguero E, et al. 2007. Genetic analysis of p38 MAP kinases in myogenesis: fundamental role of p38alpha in abrogating myoblast proliferation. EMBO J. 26:1245-1256.
52. Pisconti A, Cornelison DD, Olguin HC, Antwine TL, Olwin BB. 2010. Syndecan-3 and Notch cooperate in regulating adult myogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 190:427-441.
53. Schiaffino S, Mammucari C. 2011. Regulation of skeletal muscle growth by the IGF1-Akt/PKB pathway: insights from genetic models. Skelet. Muscle 1:4.
54. Schuster-Gossler K, Cordes R, Gossler A. 2007. Premature myogenic differentiation and depletion of progenitor cells cause severe muscle hypotrophy in Delta1 mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:537-542.
55. Seale P, et al. 2000. Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 102:777-786.
56. Shinin V, Gayraud-Morel B, Gomes D, Tajbakhsh S. 2006. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:677-687.
57. Tedesco FS, Dellavalle A, Diaz-Manera J, Messina G, Cossu G. 2010. Repairing skeletal muscle: regenerative potential of skeletal muscle stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 120:11-19.
58. Ten Broek RW, Grefte S, Von den Hoff JW. 2010. Regulatory factors and cell populations involved in skeletal muscle regeneration. J. Cell. Physiol. 224:7-16.
59. Tidball JG, Villalta SA. 2010. Regulatory interactions between muscle and the immune system during muscle regeneration. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 298:R1173-R1187.
60. Vasyutina E, et al. 2007. RBP-J (Rbpsuh) is essential to maintain muscle progenitor cells and to generate satellite cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:4443-4448.
61. Villalta SA, Nguyen HX, Deng B, Gotoh T, Tidball JG. 2009. Shifts in macrophage phenotypes and macrophage competition for arginine metabolism affect the severity of muscle pathology in muscular dystrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18:482-496.
62. Villalta SA, et al. 2011. Interleukin-10 reduces the pathology of mdx muscular dystrophy by deactivating M1 macrophages and modulating macrophage phenotype. Hum. Mol. Genet. 20:790-805.
63. Xiao F, Wang H, Fu X, Li Y, Wu Z. 2012. TRAF6 promotes myogenic differentiation via the TAK1/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and Akt pathways. PLoS One 7:e34081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034081.
64. Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Rivera AJ. 1994. Temporal expression of regulatory and structural muscle proteins during myogenesis of satellite cells on isolated adult rat fibers. Dev. Biol. 164:588-603.
65. Yan Z, et al. 2003. Highly coordinated gene regulation in mouse skeletal muscle regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 278:8826-8836.
66. Yang WL, et al. 2009. The E3 ligase TRAF6 regulates Akt ubiquitination and activation. Science 325:1134-1138.