Sex ratio and women's career choice: Does a scarcity of men lead women to choose briefcase over baby?

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 121-134

  Durante, Kristina M ^a   Griskevicius, Vladas ^b   Simpson, Jeffry A ^c   Cantú, Stephanie M ^c   Tybur, Joshua M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Careers; Mate value; Mating markets; Sex ratio; Women

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX RATIO; SEXUALITY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CAREER CHOICE; EMPLOYMENT; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL PARTNERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84871673285     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0027949     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V.,...Schaller, M. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17, 836-840. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x
2. Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., & Syme, S. L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15-24. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15
3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. American Community Survey. (2009). American fact finder. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
5. Anderson, U. S., Perea, E. F., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., & Kenrick, D. T. (2010). I only have eyes for you: Ovulation redirects attention (but not memory) to attractive men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 804-808. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.015
6. Barber, N. (2001). On the relationships between marital opportunity and teen pregnancy: The sex ratio question. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 259-267. doi:10.1177/0022022101032003001
7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
8. Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2
9. Bem, S. L. (1999). Gender, sexuality, and inequality: When many become one, who is the one and what happens to the others? In P. Moen, D. Dempster-McClain, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), A nation divided: Diversity, inequality, and community in American society (pp. 70-86). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2009). Bateman's principles and human sex roles. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 297-304. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005
11. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00023992
12. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.559
13. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204
14. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134-146.
15. Catalyst Census. (2011). 2011 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500 women board directors. Retrieved from http://catalyst.org/publication/515/3/2011-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors
16. Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218-261. doi:10.1037/a0014412
17. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., & Rudder, B. (1977, October 27). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature, 269, 797-800. doi:10.1038/269797a0
18. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1
19. Damast, A. (2008). Extra effort lures women MBAs. Businessweek. Re-trieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/nov2008/bs20081120_826628.htm
20. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001
21. Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Hill, S. E., Perilloux, C., & Li, N. P. (2011). Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 921-934. doi:10.1086/656575
22. Durante, K. M., & Li, N. P. (2009). Oestradiol level and opportunistic mating in women. Biology Letters, 5, 179-182.
23. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp.123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., & Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to educational, occupational, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In W. B. Swann Jr., J. H. Langlois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153-192). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10277-007
25. Elliott, D. B., & Simmons, T. (2011). Marital events of Americans: 2009. American Community Survey Reports. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acs-13.pdf
26. Ellis, B. J. (2004). Timing of pubertal maturation in girls. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 920-958. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.920
27. Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977, July 15). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215-223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542
28. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
29. Fossett, M. A., & Kiecolt, K. J. (1991). A methodological review of the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 941-957. doi:10.2307/352999
30. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). Trade-offs in the allocation of reproductive effort, and the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 624-636. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00653372
31. Geary, D. C. (2000). Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 55-77. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.55
32. Geary, D. C. (2006). Sex differences in social behavior and cognition: The utility of sexual selection for hypothesis generation. Hormones and Behavior, 49, 273-275. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.014
33. Geary, D. C. (2007). Evolution of fatherhood. In C. Salmon & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Family relationships: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 115-144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2006). Leaving boys behind: Public high school graduation rates. Civic Report, 48. Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/cr_48.htm
35. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281-294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281
36. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, A. J., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & White, A. E. (2012). The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 69-80. doi:10.1037/a0024761
37. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85
38. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Developmental Review, 35, 519 -549. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00295.x
39. Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too many women? The sex ratio question. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
40. Haselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. (2006). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 47-66. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3
41. Hesketh, T. (2009). Too many males in China: The causes and consequences. Significance, 6, 9-13. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2009.00335.x
42. Hesketh, T., & Xing, Z. W. (2006). Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 13271-13275. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602203103
43. Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 383-394. doi:10.1177/0146167210395603
44. Holland, J. L. (1958). A personality inventory employing occupational titles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 42, 336-342. doi:10.1037/h0047330
45. Hurtado, A. M., & Hill, K. R. (1992). Paternal effect on offspring survivorship among Ache and Hiwi hunter-gatherers. In B. S. Hewlett (Ed.), Father-child relations: Cultural and biosocial contexts (pp. 31-55). New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
46. Hurtado, A. M., Hill, K., Kaplan, H., & Hurtado, I. (1992). Trade-offs between female food acquisition and child care among Hiwi and Ache foragers. Human Nature, 3, 185-216. doi:10.1007/BF02692239
47. Ichino, A., & de Galdeano, A. S. (2005). Reconciling motherhood and work: Evidence from time use data in three countries. In D. S. Hamermesh & G. A. Pfann (Eds.), The economics of time use (pp. 263-288). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
48. James, W. H. (1987). The human sex ratio: Part 1. A review of the literature. Human Biology, 59, 721-752.
49. Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D., & Deutsch, J. C. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution, 50, 1382-1391. doi:10.2307/2410876
50. Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156-185. doi:10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9: 4<156::AID-EVAN5>3.0.CO;2-7
51. Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292-314. doi:10.1177/1745691610369469
52. Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951-969. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.951
53. Kruger, D. J. (2009). Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 280-287.
54. Kvarnemo, C., & Ahnesjo, I. (1996). The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 404-408. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10056-2
55. Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1996). Sexual deviance, antisociality, mating effort, and the use of sexually coercive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 33-48. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(96)00059-1
56. Langmore, N. E. (1998). Functions of duets and solo songs of female birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 136-140. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01241-X
57. Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947
58. Licher, D. T., Kephart, G., McLaughlin, D. K., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men. American Sociological Review, 57, 781-799. doi:10.2307/2096123
59. Lino, M. (2010). Expenditures on children by families,2009 (Miscellaneous Publication No. 1528-2009). Retrieved from http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/CRC/crc2009.pdf
60. Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996-1009. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.996
61. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
62. Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J., & Neuberg, S. L. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1107-1120. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1107
63. Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., . . . Schaller, M. (2005). Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 63-78. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63
64. Marlowe, F. (2001). Male contribution to diet and female reproductive success among foragers. Current Anthropology, 42, 755-760. doi:10.1086/323820
65. Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217-229. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00014-X
66. Mathews, T. J., & Hamilton, B. E. (2009). Delayed childbearing: More women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief, 21, 1-8.
67. Navarrete, C. D., Olsson, A., Ho, A. K., Mendes, W. B., Thomsen, L., & Sidanius, J. (2009). Fear extinction to an out-group face: The role of target gender. Psychological Science, 20, 155-158. doi:10.1111/j.1467 9280.2009.02273.x
68. Pederson, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271-291.
69. Petrecca, L. (2011). Number of female 'Fortune' 500 CEOs at record high. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/story/2011-10-26/women-ceos-fortune-500-companies/50933224/1
70. Pinker, S. (2008). The sexual paradox: Men, women, and the real gender gap. New York, NY: Scribner. Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2007). Birth order and face-to-face contact with a sibling: Firstborns have more contact than laterborns. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1796-1806. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.05.021
71. Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2008). Driving a hard bargain: Sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population. Biology Letters, 4, 31-33. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0543
72. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
73. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
74. Ramey, G., & Ramey, V. A. (2010). The rug rat race. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 129-176. doi:10.1353/eca.2010.0003
75. Reproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay Area. (2007). Bay IVF experts witness rise in single-by-choice moms [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.cryobank.com/_resources/pdf/News/Single-by-Choice.pdf
76. Richner, H., Christe, P., & Oppliger, A. (1995). Paternal investment affects prevalence of malaria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 92, 1192-1194. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.4.1192
77. Rohr, J. R., Park, D., Sullivan, A. M., McKenna, M., Propper, C. R., & Madison, D. M. (2005). Operational sex ratio in newts: Field responses and characterization of a constituent chemical cue. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 286-293. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh164
78. Roney, J. R. (2003). Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 393-404. doi:10.1177/0146167202250221
79. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247-275. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05000051
80. Shapiro, C. (2010, March 11). No life partner? Some women become single moms by choice. Psychology Today. Retrieved from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/when-youre-not-expecting/201003/no-life-partner-some-women-become-single-moms-choice
81. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
82. South, S. J., & Trent, K. (1988). Sex ratios and women's roles: A crossnational analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1096-1115. doi:10.1086/228865
83. Stone, E. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2007). Sex ratio and mate preferences: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 288-296. doi:10.1002/ejsp.357
84. Stone, P. J. (1973). Childcare in twelve countries. In S. Szalai (Ed.), The use of time (pp. 249-265). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
85. Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D., & Beal, D. J. (2011). Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 664-680. doi:10.1037/a0021669
86. Surbey, M. K., & Brice, G. R. (2007). Enhancement of self-perceived mate value precedes a shift in men's preferred mating strategy. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 513-522.
87. Taylor, P. D., & Bulmer, M. G. (1980). Local mate competition and the sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 86, 409-419. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(80)90342-2
88. Townsend, J. M. (1989). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 241-253. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(89)90002-2
89. U.S. Department of Labor Women's Bureau. (2010). Quick stats on women workers, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/QS-womenwork2010.htm
90. Weir, L. K., Grant, J. W. A., & Hutchings, J. A. (2010). Patterns of aggression and operational sex ratio within alternative male phenotypes in Atlantic salmon. Ethology, 116, 166 -175. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01723.x
91. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl. 4), 177-179. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0134