The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 69-80

  Griskevicius, Vladas ^a   Tybur, Joshua M ^b   Ackerman, Joshua M ^c   Delton, Andrew W ^d   Robertson, Theresa E ^d   White, Andrew E ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Consumer behavior; Financial decisions; Mating; Sex ratio

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REWARD; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX RATIO; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS, BEHAVIORAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REWARD; SEX FACTORS; SEX RATIO; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84855328138     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024761     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ackerman J.M., Griskevicius V., Li N.P. Let's get serious: Communicating commitment in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:1079-1094.
2. Ackerman J.M., Kenrick D.T. Cooperative courtship: Helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35:1285-1300. doi: 10.1177/0146167209335640.
3. Ackerman J.M., Shapiro J.R., Neuberg S.L., Kenrick D.T., Becker D.V., Griskevicius V., Schaller M. They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science 2006, 17:836-840. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01790.x.
4. 2005-2009 American Community Survey 5-year estimates [Data file] 2009, American Community Survey, Available from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=&-ds_name=ACS_2009_5YR_G00_&-_lang=en&-redoLog=true&-mt_name=ACS_2009_5YR_G00_GCT1203_US33F&-format=US-33F&-CONTEXT=gct.
5. Balshine-Earn S. Reproductive rates, operational sex ratios and mate choice in St. Peter's fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1996, 39:107-116. doi: 10.1007/s002650050272.
6. Barber N. On the relationships between marital opportunity and teen pregnancy: The sex ratio question. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 2001, 32:259-267. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032003001.
7. Barber N. The sex ratio and female marital opportunity as historical predictors of violent crime in England, Scotland, and the United States. Cross-Cultural Research 2003, 37:373-392. doi: 10.1177/1069397103254011.
8. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. Sexual economics: Sex as female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:339-363. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_2.
9. Buss D.M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1989, 12:1-49. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00023992.
10. Buss D.M., Schmitt D.P. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 1993, 100:204-232. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.
11. Buss D.M., Shackelford T.K. From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 72:346-361. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.346.
12. Campbell L., Simpson J.A., Boldry J., Kashy D.A. Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:510-531. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510.
13. Daly M., Wilson M. Homicide 1988, de Gruyter, New York, NY.
14. Daly M., Wilson M. Carpe diem: Adaptation and devaluing the future. Quarterly Review of Biology 2005, 80:55-60. doi: 10.1086/431025.
15. Drèze J., Keher R. Crime, gender, and society in India: Insights from homicide data. Population Development Review 2000, 26:335-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00335.x.
16. Durante K.M., Griskevicius V., Hill S.E., Perilloux C., Li N.P. Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: Hormonal influences on consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 2011, 37:921-934.
17. Eberle M., Kappeler P.M. Sex in the dark: Determinants and consequences of mixed male mating tactics in Microcebus murinus, a small solitary nocturnal primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2004, 57:77-90. doi: 10.1007/s00265-004-0826-1.
18. Ellis B.J. Timing of pubertal maturation in girls. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:920-958. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.920.
19. Emlen S.T., Oring L.W. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 1977, July 15, 197:215-223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542.
20. What is your state of credit? 2010, Experian Information Solutions, Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://www.experian.com/live-credit-smart/state-of-credit-map.html.
21. Fisher R.A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 1930, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
22. Fletcher G.J.O., Kerr P.S.G. Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:627-658. doi: 10.1037/a0019792.
23. Forsgren E., Amundsen T., Borg A.A., Bjelvenmark J. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 2004, June 4, 429:551-554. doi: 10.1038/nature02562.
24. Fossett M.A., Kiecolt K.J. A methodological review of the sex ratio: Alternatives for comparative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1991, 53:941-957. doi: 10.2307/352999.
25. Gangestad S.W., Simpson J.A. Trade-offs in the allocation of reproductive effort, and the evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:624-636. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00653372.
26. Green L., Myerson J. A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:769-792. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769.
27. Griskevicius V., Delton A.W., Robertson T.E., Tybur J.M. The environmental contingency of life history strategies: Influences of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:241-254. doi: 10.1037/a0021082.
28. Griskevicius V., Goldstein N.J., Mortensen C.R., Cialdini R.B., Kenrick D.T. Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 91:281-294. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281.
29. Griskevicius V., Goldstein N.J., Mortensen C.R., Sundie J.M., Cialdini R.B., Kenrick D.T. Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 2009, 46:384-395. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384.
30. Griskevicius V., Shiota M.N., Nowlis S.M. The many shades of rose-colored glasses: An evolutionary approach to the influence of different positive emotions. Journal of Consumer Research 2010, 37:238-250.
31. Griskevicius V., Tybur J.M., Delton A.W., Robertson T.E. The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:1015-1026.
32. Griskevicius V., Tybur J.M., Gangestad S.W., Perea E.F., Shapiro J.R., Kenrick D.T. Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96:980-994. doi: 10.1037/a0013907.
33. Griskevicius V., Tybur J.M., Sundie J.M., Cialdini R.B., Miller G.F., Kenrick D.T. Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 93:85-102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.85.
34. Gu B., Roy K. Sex ratio at birth in China with reference to other areas in East Asia: What we know. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 1995, 10:17-42.
35. Guilmoto C.Z. The sex transition in Asia. Population and Developmental Review 2009, 35:519-549. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00295.x.
36. Guttentag M., Secord P.F. Too many women? The sex ratio question 1983, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
37. Haselton M.G., Bryant G.A., Wilke A., Frederick D.A., Galperin A., Frankenhuis W.E., Moore T. Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition 2009, 27:733-763. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.733.
38. Haselton M.G., Nettle D. The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10:47-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.
39. Hesketh T. Too many males in China: The causes and consequences. Significance 2009, 6:9-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-9713.2009.00335.x.
40. Hesketh T., Zhu W.X. Abnormal sex ratio in human populations: Causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2006, 103:13271-13275. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602203103.
41. Hudson V., Den Boer A. A surplus of men, a deficit of peace: Security and sex ratios in Asia's largest states. International Security 2002, 26:5-38. doi: 10.1162/016228802753696753.
42. James W.H. The human sex ratio: Part 1. A review of the literature. Human Biology 1987, 59:721-752.
43. Jha P., Kumar R., Vasa P., Dhingra N., Thiruchelvam D., Moineddin R. Male to female sex ratio of children born in India: National survey of 1.1 million households. Lancet 2006, January 9, 367:211-218. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67930-0.
44. Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Neuberg S.L., Schaller M. Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:292-314. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369469.
45. Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Sundie J.M., Li N.P., Li Y.J., Neuberg S.L. Deep rationality: The evolutionary economics of decision-making. Social Cognition 2009, 27:764-785. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764.
46. Kenrick D.T., Li N.L., Butner J. Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review 2003, 110:3-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.3.
47. Kirby K.N., Marakovic N.N. Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:100-104. doi: 10.3758/BF03210748.
48. Kruger D.J. Male scarcity is differentially related to male marital likelihood across the life course. Evolutionary Psychology 2009, 7:280-287.
49. Kvarnemo C., Anhesjo I. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1996, 11:404-408. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10056-2.
50. Kvarnemo C., Forsgren E. The influence of potential reproductive rate and variation in mate quality on male and female choosiness in the sand goby. Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2000, 48:378-384. doi: 10.1007/s002650000246.
51. Li N.P., Bailey J.M., Kenrick D.T., Linsenmeier J.A. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:947-955. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947.
52. Lichter D.T., Kephart G., McLaughlin D.K., Landry D.J. Race and retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men. American Sociological Review 1992, 57:781-799. doi: 10.2307/2096123.
53. Maner J.K., Kenrick D.T., Neuberg S.L., Becker D.V., Robertson T., Hofer B., Schaller M. Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 88:63-78. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.63.
54. Marlowe F. Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behavioural Processes 2000, 51:45-61. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2.
55. Miller G.F. Spent: Sex, evolution, and consumer behavior 2009, Viking, New York, NY.
56. Mills S.C., Reynolds J.D. Operational sex ratio and alternative reproductive behaviours in the European bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2003, 54:98-104.
57. Norvilitis J.M., Merwin M.M., Osberg T.M., Roehling P.V., Young P., Kamas M.M. Personality factors, money attitudes, financial knowledge and credit card debt in college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36:1395-1413. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00065.x.
58. Pedersen F.A. Secular trends in human sex ratios: Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature 1991, 2:271-291.
59. Pollet T.V., Nettle D. Driving a hard bargain: Sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical U.S. population. Biology Letters 2008, 4:31-33. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0543.
60. Roney J.R. Effects of visual exposure to the opposite sex: Cognitive aspects of mate attraction in human males. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003, 29:393-404. doi: 10.1177/0146167202250221.
61. Sahni M., Verman N., Narula D., Varghese R.M., Sreevivas V., Puliyel J.M. Missing girls in India: Infanticide, feticide, and made-to-order pregnancies: Insights from hospital-based sex-ratio-at-birth over the last century. PLOS ONE 2008, 3:e2224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002224.
62. Schmitt D.P. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2005, 28:247-275. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000051.
63. South S.J., Trent K. Sex ratios and women's roles: A cross-national analysis. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 93:1096-1115. doi: 10.1086/228865.
64. Stone E.A., Shackelford T.K., Buss D.M. Sex ratio and mate preferences: A cross-cultural investigation. European Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 37:288-296. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.357.
65. Sundie J.M., Kenrick D.T., Griskevicius V., Tybur J.M., Vohs K.D., Beal D.J. Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011, 100:664-680.
66. Taylor P.D., Bulmer M.G. Local mate competition and the sex ratio. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1980, 86:409-419. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90342-2.
67. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 1972, 136-179. Aldine, Chicago, IL. B. Campbell (Ed.).
68. Van den Bergh B., Dewitte S., Warlop L. Bikinis instigate generalized impatience in intertemporal choice. Journal of Consumer Research 2008, 35:85-97. doi: 10.1086/525505.
69. Wei S.J., Zhang X. The competitive saving motive: Evidence from rising sex ratio and savings rates in China (Working Paper No. 15093) 2009, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
70. Weir L.K., Grant J.W.A., Hutchings J.A. The influence of operational sex ratio on the intensity of competition for mates. American Naturalist 2011, 177:167-176. doi: 10.1086/657918.
71. Williams G.C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 1957, 11:398-411. doi: 10.2307/2406060.
72. Wilson M., Daly M. Competitiveness, risk-taking, and violence: The young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology 1985, 6:59-73. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(85)90041-X.
73. Wilson M., Daly M. Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?. Proceedings of the Royal Society 2004, B271(Suppl 4):S177-S179. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0134.