Integration of user behaviour and product behaviour during the design phase: Software for behavioural design approach

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 100-114

  Sun, Huichao ^a,b,c   Houssin, Rémy ^b,c   Gardoni, Mickael ^b,d   de Bauvrond, François ^b  

^a JILIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSA DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d University of Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

BDA software; Product design; Product task; UML; User task

Indexed keywords

DESIGN APPROACHES; DESIGN PHASE; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN WORK; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS; ERGONOMIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN ASPECTS; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERS; PRODUCT PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT TASK; SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS; UML; USER BEHAVIOUR; USER TASK;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; MACHINE DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; KNOWLEDGE BASE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84871642900     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: 18728219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Bartolomei, J.E., Miller, T., 2001. Functional Analysis Systems Technique (F.A.S.T) as a Group Knowledge Elicitation Method for Model Building. Technical Report, United States Air Force.
2. Battini D., Faccio M., Personaa A., Sgarbossaa F. New methodological framework to improve productivity and ergonomics in assembly system design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2011, 41(1):30-42.
3. Blanchard B.S. System Engineering Management 2004, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
4. Booch G., Rumbaugh J., Jacobson I. Unified Modeling Language User Guide. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series 2005, Addison-Wesley Professional.
5. Broberg O. Integrating ergonomics into the product development process. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1997, 19(4):317-327.
6. Clarkson J. Inclusive Design: Design for the Whole Population 2003, Springer-Verlag, London.
7. Coulibaly A., Houssin R., Mutel B. Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products. Computers in Industry 2008, 59(5):438-449.
8. Duursma, C., Olsson, O., Ulf, S., 1994. Task Model Definition and Task Analysis Process. Technical Report Technical Report KADS-II/M5/VUB/TR/004/2.0 ESPRIT ProjectP5248, Free University Brussels and Swedish Institute of Computer Science.
9. Dym C., Agogino A., Eris O., Frey D., Leifer L. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education 2005, 94(1):103-120.
10. Feng S.C., Song E.Y. A manufacturing process information model for design and process planning integration. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 2003, 22(1):1-15.
11. Gero J.S. Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine 1990, 11(4):26-36.
12. Gero J.S., Kannengiesser U. The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 2004, 25:373-391.
13. Gilad I., Karni R. Architecture of an expert system for ergonomics analysis and design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 1999, 23(3):205-221.
14. Godfrey-Smith P. Theory and Reality: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science 2003, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Gyi D., Cain R., Campbell I. The value of computer-based product representations in co-designing with older users. Journal of Engineering Design 2010, 21(2):305-313.
16. Hasan R., Bernard A., Ciccotelli J., Martin P. Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation. Safety Science 2003, 41(2-3):155-179.
17. Holtzblatt K., Wendell J.B., Wood S. Rapid Contextual Design: a How-to Guide to Key Techniques for User-centered Design 2005, Morgan Kaufman/Elsevier, San Francisco, CA.
18. Houkes W., Vermaas P.E., Dorst K., de Vries M.J. Design and use as plans: an action-theoretical account. Design Studies 2002, 23(3):303-320.
19. Houssin R., Gardoni M. Software framework for the approach: computer aided safety integration in design process (CACID). Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 2009, 8(1):27-45.
20. Houssin R., Bernard A., Martin P., Ris G., Cherrier F. Information system based on a working situation model for a new design approach in concurrent engineering. Journal of Engineering Design 2006, 17(1):35-54.
21. Houssin R., Sun H., Gardoni M. A behavioural design approach to improving mechanical system design with integration of use conditions. International Journal of Design and Innovation Research 2010, 5(3).
22. Howard T.J., Culley S., Dekoninck E. Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies 2008, 29(2):160-180.
23. Hsu S.H., Chuang M.C., Chang C.C. A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2000, 25(4):375-391.
24. Irwin G., Turk D. An ontological analysis of use case modeling grammar. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 61:1-36.
25. Kernan B., Lynch A., Sheahan C. A methodology for improving enterprise performance by analysing worker capabilities via simulation. International Journal of Production Research 2011, 49(20):5987-5998.
26. Labrousse, M., 2004. Proposition d'un modèle conceptuel unifié pour la gestion dynamique des connaissances d'entreprise. PhD. thesis., Ecole Centrale de Nantes, France.
27. Maraghy E.l., Kuzgunkaya H.O., Urbanic R.J. Manufacturing systems configuration complexity. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 2005, 54(1):445-450.
28. Marsot J. QFD: a methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage. Applied Ergonomics 2005, 36(2):185-192.
29. Pahl G., Beitz W. Engineering Design 1996, Springer, London. second ed.
30. Pilemalm S., Lindell P.O., Hallberg N., Eriksson H. Integrating the Rational Unified Process and participatory design for development of socio-technical systems: a user participative approach. Design Studies 2007, 28(3):263-288.
31. Redstrom J. Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Design Studies 2006, 27(2):123-139.
32. Redstrom J. RE: definitions of use. Design Studies 2008, 29(4):410-423.
33. Russell S.J., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach 2010, Prentice Hall.
34. Sandis C. New Essays on the Explanation of Action 2009, Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Seim R., Broberg O. Participatory workspace design: a new approach for ergonomists?. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2010, 40(1):25-33.
36. Siu K.W.M. Users' creative responses and designers' roles. Design Issues 2003, 19(2):64-73.
37. Skepper N., Straker L., Pollock C. A case study of the use of ergonomics information in a heavy engineering design process. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2000, 26(3):425-435.
38. Stalker R. A function-behaviour-structure framework for the lifecycle of an artefact. Proceeding of Creativity and Cognition 2002, 4:14-16. Loughborough University, U.K, October.
39. Suh N.P. Axiomatic Design - Advances and Applications 2001, Oxford university press, New York.
40. Sun, H., Houssin, R., Gardoni, M., 2010. La conception comportementale: Une nouvelle approche pour améliorer la performance de produit. In: 17ème Congrès de Maîtrise des Risques et de Sûreté de Fonctionnement, France.
41. Sun, H., Houssin, R., Gardoni, M., 2011. Improving product performance with integration of using tasks during the design phase: a behavioural design approach. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, Metz, France.
42. Takala R. Product demonstrator: a system for up-front testing of user-related product features. Journal of Engineering Design 2005, 16(3):329-336.
43. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., et al., 1995. FBS modeling: modeling scheme of function for conceptual design. In: Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, pp. 271-278.
44. Valtonen, A., 2005. Six decades-and six different roles for the industrial designer. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference, Copenhagen.
45. Wang L., Shen W., Xie H., Neelamkavil J., Pardasani A. Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design 2002, 34(13):981-996.
46. Wixson, J.R., 1999. Function analysis and decomposition using function analysis systems technique. In: IX International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE 99), Brighton, England.
47. Xu J., Houssin R., Gardoni M. Fostering continuous innovation in design with an integrated knowledge management approach. Computers in Industry 2011, 62(4):125-147.