Software framework for the approach: Computer aided safety integration in design process (CASID)

Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 27-45

  Houssin, Rémy ^a,b   Gardoni, Mickaël ^a,c  

^a INSA DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^c University of Quebec   (Canada)

Author keywords

Design process; Machine safety; Standards; Working situation

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED; DESIGN PROCESS; MACHINE SAFETY; PRODUCTION LINE; PROTOTYPE SOFTWARE; SAFETY ASPECTS; SAFETY INTEGRATION; SAFETY PROBLEMS; SOFTWARE FRAMEWORKS; SYSTEMATIC METHOD; WORKING SITUATION;

MACHINE DESIGN; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 66549130200     PISSN: 02196867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219686709001638     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh and I. Jacobson, The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series, Addiso - Wesley, ISBN 0-201-57168-4, 1998.
2. J. C. Blaise, P. Lhoste and J. Ciccotelli, Formalisation of normative knowledge for safe design, Safety Science 41 (2003) 241-261.
3. G. M. Nijssen and T. Halpin, Conceptual Schema and Relational Database Design (Prentice Hall, Sydney, 1989).
4. E. Fadier and J. Ciccotelli, How to integrate safety in design: methods and models, Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 9(4) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999) 367-380.
5. F. Darses and M. Wolff, How do designers represent to themselves the users' needs?, Applied Ergonomics 37 (2006) 757-764.
6. M. P. Jones, Designing for operations: towards a sociotechnical systems and cognitive engineering approach to concurrent engineering, International journal of Industrial Ergonomics 16 (1995) 283-292.
7. H. Sakaiand and K. Amasaka, V-Mics, advanced TPS for strategic production administration: innovative maintenance combining DB and CG, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems (JAMS) 4(1) (June, 2005) 5-20.
8. M. Gardoni, Concurrent engineering in research projects to support information content management, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CERA) 13(2) (June, 1063 293X, 2005) 135-144.
9. C. De la Garza and E. Fadier, Towards proactive safety in design: a comparison of safety integration approaches in two design processes, International Journal of Cognition Technology and Work, IJ-CTW 7(1) (2005) 51-62.
10. R. Hasan, P. Martin and A. Bernard, Resolving contradictions problem related to safety integration in a design, TRIZ-Journal, online http://www.triz-journal.com/articles/htm. (January, 2004).
11. D. Jouffroy, S. Demor, J. Ciccotelli and P. Martin, An approach to integrate safety at the design stage of numerically controlled woodworking machines, Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (Kluwer Academic, ISBN 0-7923-6024-9, 1999), pp. 643-650.
12. M. Pouliquen, A. Bernard, J. Marsot and L. Chodorge, Virtual hands and virtual reality multimodal platform to design safer industrial systems, Computers in Industry 58 (2007) 46-56.
13. R. Hasan, A. Bernard, J. Ciccotelli and P. Martin, Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation, Journal Safety Sciences, ISSN: 0925 - 7535, Safety by design, online http://www.sciencedirect.com/ 41(2-3) (March 2003), 155-179.
14. D. Roller, O. Eck and S. Dalakakis, Advanced database approach for cooperative product design, Journal of Engineering Design 13(1) (March 01, 2002) 49-61.
15. EN 292-1, European Standard, Safety of machinery, Basic Concepts, general principles of design - Part 1: Basic terminology, methodology, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (December, 1991).
16. EN 614-1, European Standard, safety of machinery, Ergonomic design principles -Part 1: Terminology and general principles, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (April, 1995).
17. EN 1010, European Standard Definitive Project. Safety requirements for the design and construction of printing and paper converting machines - Part 1: common requirements, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (July, 1997).
18. EN 1050, European Standard, safety of machinery - principles for risk assessment, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (January, 1997).
19. EN 292-2, Safety of machinery, Basic Concepts, general principles of design, Part 2: Basic terminology, methodology, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels (October, 1999).
20. R. Houssin, A. Bernard, P. Martin, G. Ris and F. Cherrier, Information system based on the working situation model for an original concurrent engineering design approach, Journal of Engineering Design 17(1) (2006).
21. A. Ouazzani, A. Bernard and J. C. Bocquet, Design process management system, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 97, Tampere (1997).
22. N. Worsell and J. Wilday, Proposed risk assessment methodology for designing safe machinery, in Proc. of ESREL 2000, Foresight and Precaution, Cottam, Harvey, Pape and Tate (eds.), Rotterdam, Netherlands, ISBN 90-5809-140-6 (2000), pp. 1441-1448.
23. A. Coulibaly, R. Houssin and B. Mutel, Maintainability and safety indicators at design stage for mechanical products, Computers in Industry 59(5) (May, 2008) 438-449.
24. D. H. Stamatis, Failure mode effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution (second edn), American Society for Quality (ASQ), ISBN: 0-87389-598-3, USA.
25. S. Ottosson, Virtual reality in the product development process, Journal of Engineering Design 13(2) (June 01, 2002) 159-172.
26. V. Hilaire, P. Gruer, A. Koukam and O. Simonin, Formal specification approach of role dynamics in agent organisations: application to the satisfaction-altruism model, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (IJSEKE) 17(5) (October, 2007).
27. A. Jaime, M. Gardoni and C. Frank, Communications tools in research projects to support Semi and Non Structured Information, Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics 3(3) (2006) 85-93.