Information system based on a working situation model for a new design approach in concurrent engineering

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-54

  Houssin, R ^a,d   Bernard, A ^b   Martin, P ^c   Ris, G ^a   Cherrier, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE DE NANTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d INSA DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Design process; Industrial design; Information system; Safety; Standards; Working situation

Indexed keywords

EID: 30444450126     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820500276048     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aghazadeh, F. and Waly, S.M., A design and selection guide for hand held tools. In Ergonomics in Manufacturing Raising Productivity through Workplace Improvement, edited by W. Karwowski and G. Salvendy, pp. 65-85, 1998 (Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, USA).
2. Aldanondo, M., Rougé, S. and Véron, M., Expert configurator for concurrent engineering: caméléon software and model. J. Intelligent Manufact., 2000, 11, 127-134.
3. Bernard, A. and Hasan, R., 'Working situation' model as the base of life-cycle modelling of socio-technical production systems, in Proceedings of the CIRP Design Seminar, Honk-Kong, CD-ROM, 2002, paper PD03.
4. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J. and Jacobson, I., The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, The Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series, 2000 (Addison-Wesley: Boston, USA).
5. Bullinger, H.J., Braun, M. and Schopp, R., Corporate ergonomic efforts in Germany. In Ergonomics in Manufacturing Raising Productivity through Workplace Improvement, edited by W. Karwowski and G. Salvendy, pp. 465-484 1998, (Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, USA).
6. rd International multidisplinary Conference, Qualité et Sûreté de fonctionnement, Paris, France, 1999, pp. 299-307.
7. Das, B., Manufacturing workstation design. In Ergonomics in Manufacturing Raising Productivity through Workplace Improvement, edited by W. Karwowski and G. Salvendy, pp 243-275, 1998 (Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, USA).
8. Day, D., Participatory ergonomics - a practical guide for the plant manager. In Ergonomics in Manufacturing Raising Productivity through Workplace Improvement, Edited by W. Karwowski and G. Salvendy, pp 143-165, 1998 (Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, USA).
9. De Kleer, J. and Brown, J.S., A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artif. Intelligence, 1984, 24(1-3), 7-83.
10. Didelot, A., Fadier, E. and Ciccotelli, J., Contributions and limitations of standardization with respect to automated system design, in Proceedings of ESREL 2000, Foresight and Precaution, edited by M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape and J.J. Tate, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 1, 2000, pp. 127-131.
11. European Committee for Standardization, European Standard, Safety of Machinery, Basic Concepts, General Principles of Design-Part 1: Basic Terminology, Methodology, EN 292-1, 1991 (European Committee for Standardization: Brussels).
12. European Committee for Standardization, European Standard, Safety of Machinery, Terminology, E 09-003, ENV 1070, 1993 (European Committee for Standardization: Brussels).
13. European Committee for Standardization, European Standard, Safety of Machinery, Ergonomic Design Principles - Part 1: Terminology and General Principles, EN 614-1 1995 (European Committee for Standardization: Brussels).
14. European Committee for Standardization, European Standard, Safety of Machinery-Principles for Risk Assessment, EN 1050, 1997 (European Committee for Standardization: Brussels).
15. European Committee for Standardization, Safety of Machinery, Basic Concepts, General Principles of Design, Part 2: Basic Terminology, Methodology, EN 292-2, 1999 (European Committee for Standardization: Brussels).
16. Fadier, E., and Ciccotelli, J., Integrating safety into the design of industrial system: a general overview, in Proceedings of the 9th JFAC Symposium on Information Control in Manufacturing, Nancy, France, 1998, pp. 233-239.
17. Garin H., AMDEC/AMDE/AEEL l'essentiel de la méthode, QUALITE series, 1994 (AFNOR: Paris).
18. Harani, Y., Une approche Multi-Modèles pour la capitalisation des connaissances dans le domaine de la conception. PhD Thesis, INPG, Laboratoire de Génie Industriel et de Production Mécanique, France, 1997.
19. Hasan, R., Contribution à l'amèlioration des performances des systémes complexes par le prise en compte des aspects socio-techniques des̀ la conception: proposition d'un modèle original de SITUATION DE TRAVAIL pour une nouvelle approche de conception, PhD thesis, University of Poincaré Nancy 1, 2002.
20. Hasan, R., Ciccotelli, J., Bernard, A. and Martin, P., Representation and evaluation of risks during the design phase of a complex system, in Proceedings of ESREL 2000, Foresight and Precaution, edited by M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape and J.J. Tate, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2000, pp. 141-147.
21. Hasan, R., Bernard, A., Ciccotelli, J. and Martin, P., Integrating safety into the design process: elements and concepts relative to the working situation. J. Safety Sci., 2003a, 41(2-3), 155-179.
22. Hasan, R., Bernard, A. and Ciccotelli, J., Proposal of a new design approach integrating the concept of the working situation, In Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, edited by G. Gogu, D. Coutellier, P. Chedmail and P. Ray, pp. 379-390, 2003b (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Guildford, UK).
23. Hasan, R., Martin, P. and Bernard, A., Resolving contradictions problem related to safety integration in a design. TRIZ-Journal, 2004a. Available online at: http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2004.
24. Hasan, R., Bernard, A. and Ris, G., Proposition of a software for computer aided safety integration in design processes (CASID), in Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Occupational Risk Prevention, Santiago de composetela, Spain, 2004b.
25. Luck, R., Dialogue in participatory design. Design studies J., 2003, 24(6), 523-535.
26. Margolin, V., Getting to know the user. Design studies J., 1997, 18(3), 227-236.
27. Ortiz Hernandez, J., Les Systèmes de Production Automatisés: une approche socio-technique. PhD report. Université de Franche-Comté, U.F.R. des Sciences et des Techniques, Automatique et Informatique, Besançon, France, 1995.
28. Ottosson, S., Virtual reality in the product development process. J. Eng. Design, 2002, 13(2), 159-172.
29. Ouazzani, A., Bernard, A. and Bocquet, J.-C., Design process management system, in Proceedings ot the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 97, Tampere, FL, 1997.
30. Roller, D., Eck, O. and Dalakakis, S., Advanced database approach for cooperative product design. J. Eng. Design, 2002,13(1), 49-61.
31. Vannas, V., Perälä, M. and Mattila, M., Experiences of safety and human factors design in FMS implementations, in Proceedings of the 10th ISPE/IFAC International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future CARS & FOF'94, Information Technology for Modern Manufacturing, Attawa, Canada, 1994.
32. Worsell, N. and Wilday, J., Proposed risk assessment methodology for designing safe machinery, in Proceedings of ESREL 2000, Foresight and Precaution, edited by M.P. Cottam, D.W. Harvey, R.P. Pape and J.J. Tate, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2000, pp. 1441-1448.
33. Yannou, B., Analyse fonctionnelle et analyse de la valeur. In Conception de produits mécaniques: méthodes, modèles et outils, edited by M. Tollenaere, pp. 77-104, 1998 (Editions HERMES: Paris).