Dyadic Power Profiles: Power-Contingent Strategies for Value Creation in Negotiation

Human Communication Research

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-20

  Olekalns, Mara ^a   Smith, Philip Leigh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871446816     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01440.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adair, W. L. (2003). Integrative sequences and negotiation outcomes in same- and mixed-culture negotiations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 273-296.
2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362-1377.
4. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2003). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 303-319.
6. Donnellon, A. (1994). Team work: Linguistic models of negotiating differences. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 4, 71-124.
7. Donohue, W., Diez, M., & Hamilton, M. (1984). Coding naturalistic negotiation interaction. Human Communication Research, 10, 403-425.
8. Fragale, A. R. (2006). The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 243-261.
9. Fry, W., Firestone, I., & Williams, D. (1983). Negotiation process and outcome of stranger dyads and dating couples: Do lovers lose? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 1-16.
10. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
11. Giebels, E., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2000). Interdependence in negotiation: Effects of exit options and social motive on distributive and integrative negotiations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 255-272.
12. Greenacre, M. J. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. London, England: Academic Press.
13. Herbst, U., & Schwarz, S. (2011). How valid is negotiation research based on student sample groups? New insights into a long-standing controversy. Negotiation Journal, 27, 147-170.
14. Holmes, M. E., & Sykes, R. E. (1993). A test of the fit of Gulliver's phase model to hostage negotiations, Communication Studies, 44, 38-55.
15. Kim, P., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Choosing the path to bargaining power: An empirical comparison of BATNA and contribution to negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 373-381.
16. Kim, P., Pinkley, R., & Fragale, A. R. (2005). Power dynamics in negotiation, Academy of Management Review, 30, 799-822.
17. Kolb, D. (2004). Staying in the game or changing it: An analysis of moves and turns in negotiation, Negotiation Journal, 20, 253-267.
18. Lawler, E. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 321-352.
19. Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (2006). 3-D negotiation: Powerful tools to change the game in your most important deals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2010). Negotiation (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21. McAlister, L., Bazerman M., & Fader, P. (1986). Power and goal setting in channel negotiation. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 238-263.
22. Magee, J. C., Galinsky, A. D., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007). Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200-212.
23. Mannix, E., Thompson, L., & Bazerman, M. (1989). Negotiation in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 508-517.
24. Mannix, E., & Neale, M. (1993). Power imbalance and the pattern of exchange in dyadic negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2, 119-133.
25. Mulac, A., & Bradac, J. J. (1995). Women's style in problem-solving interaction: Powerless, or simply feminine? In P. J. Kalbfleisch, & M. J. Cody (Eds.) Gender, power and communication in human relationships (pp. 83-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Murnighan, J. K., Babcock, L., Thompson, L., & Pillutla, M. (1999). The information dilemma in negotiations: Effects of experience, incentives and integrative potential. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 313-339.
27. Olekalns, M., & Brett, J. M. (2008). Beyond the deal: Next generation negotiation skills. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 309-314.
28. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L (2003). Testing the relationships among negotiators' motivational orientations, strategy choices and outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 101-117.
29. Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2000). Negotiating optimal outcomes: The role of strategic sequences in competitive negotiations. Human Communication Research, 26, 527-557.
30. Olekalns, M., & Weingart, L. R. (2008). Emergent negotiations: Stability and shifts in process dynamics. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 135-160.
31. Pruitt, D. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.
32. Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 171-191.
33. Putnam, L. L., & Wilson, S. R. (1989). Argumentation and bargaining strategies as discriminators of integrative outcomes. In M. A. Rahim (Ed.), Managing conflict: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 121-141), New York, NY: Praeger Press.
34. Rubin, J. Z., & Zartman, I. W. (1995). Asymmetrical negotiations: Some survey results that may surprise. Negotiation Journal, 14, 349-364.
35. Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction and relationships, Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
36. Smith, P. L., Olekalns, M., & Weingart, L. R. (2005). Markov chain analyses of communication processes in negotiation. International Negotiation, 10, 97-113.
37. Weingart, L. R., & Olekalns, M. (2004). Communication processes in negotiation. In M. Gelfand, & J. M. Brett (Eds.), Handbook of culture and negotiation (pp. 143-157). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Weingart, L. R., Brett, J. M., Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L (2007). Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 994-1010.
39. Wilson, S. R., & Putnam, L. L. (1990). Interaction goals in negotiation. Communication Yearbook, 13, 374-406.
40. Wolfe, R. J., & McGinn, K. (2005). Perceived relative power and its influence on negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 3-20.