Do bidders require a monetary premium for cognitive effort in an auction?

Journal of Socio-Economics

Volumn 42, Issue , 2013, Pages 99-105

  Rosenboim, Mosi ^a   Shavit, Tal ^a   Cohen, Chen ^b  

^a The College of Management Academic Studies ^*  (Israel)

^b ASHKELON ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cognitive effort; Demand effect; Lottery; Premium

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871443302     PISSN: 10535357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2012.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bardsley N. Experimental economics and the artificiality of alteration. Journal of Economic Methodology 2005, 12:239-251.
2. Bardsley N. Dictator game giving: altruism or artifact?. Experimental Economics 2008, 11:122-133.
3. Becker M., Gordon H., Degroot M., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 1964, 9:226-232.
4. Binmore K., Shaked A., Sutton J. Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: a preliminary study. American Economic Review 1985, 75:1178-1180.
5. Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology. 1999, Guilford Press, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
6. Coller M., Harrison G.W., Rutstorm E.E. Are discount rates constant?, reconciling theory and observation. University of Central Florida, College of Business Administration, Department of Economics 2005.
7. Curley S.P., Yates J.F., Abrams R.A. Psychological sources of ambiguity avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1986, 38:230-256.
8. Dowling G.R. Perceived risk: the concept and its measurement. Psychology and Marketing 1986, 3:193-210.
9. Eagly A.H., Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes 1993, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, Texas.
10. Elster J., Loewenstein G. Utility from memory and anticipation. Choice over time. 1992, 213-234. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. G.F. Loewenstein, J. Elster (Eds.).
11. Forgas J.P. Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117:39-66.
12. Forgas J.P. The affect infusion model (AIM): an integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. Theories of Mood and Cognition, A User's Guidebook 2001, 99-134. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. L.L. Martin, G.L. Clore (Eds.).
13. Garbarino E.C., Edell J.A. Cognitive effort, affect and choice. Journal of Consumer Research 1997, 24(2):147-158.
14. Hogarth R.M. Educating Intuition 2001, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
15. Holt C., Laury S. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 2002, 92(5):1644-1655.
16. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of choice under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47(2):263-291.
17. Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy 1990, 98:1325-1348.
18. Kahneman D., Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: attribution substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications (49-81) 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
19. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 2003, 58(9):697-720.
20. Kelly D., Harper D.J., Landau B. Questionnaire mode effects in interactive information retrieval experiments. Information Processing and Management 2008, 44:122-141.
21. Kivetz R. The effects of effort and intrinsic motivation on risky choice. Marketing Science 2003, 22(4):477-502.
22. Kruglanski A.W., Thompson E.P., Spiegel S. Separate or equal? Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single process " unimodel" Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology 1999, Guilford Press, New York. S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (Eds.).
23. Lee T.D., Swinnen S.P., Serrien D.J. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest 1994, 46:328-344.
24. Lerner J.S., Tetlock P.E. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:255-275.
25. Loewenstein G., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
26. Lonnqvist J.E., Verkasalu M., Bezmenova I. Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding. European Journal of Personality 2007, 21:853-868.
27. Lopes L. Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1987, 20:225-295.
28. Milgram S. Behavioral studies of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 67:371-378.
29. Myers D.G. Intuition: its powers and perils 2002, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
30. Paulhus D.L. Measurement and control of response bias. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes 1991, 17-59. Academic Press, San Diego. J.P. Robinson, P. Shaver, L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.).
31. Payne, John W. Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin 1982, 92(2):382-402.
32. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change 1986, Springer Verlag, New York.
33. Plott C.R., Zeiler K. The willingness to pay - willingness to accept gap, the " endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. The American Economic Review 2005, 95:530-545.
34. Rosenboim M., Shavit T. Whose money is it anyway? Using prepaid incentives in experimental economics to create a natural environment. Experimental Economics 2012, 15:145-157.
35. Rottenstreich Y., Christopher K.H. Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science 2002, 12(3):185-190.
36. Russo J.E., Dosher B.A. Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1983, 9:676-696.
37. Sanfey A.G., Chang L.J. Multiple systems in decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2008, 1128:53-62.
38. Shogren J.F., Cho S., Koo C., List J., Park C., Polo P., Wilhelmi R. Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA. Resource and Energy Economics 2001, 23:97-109.
39. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63(2):129-138.
40. Simon H.A. Models of Man 1957, Wiley, New York.
41. Simon H.A., Lea G. Problem solving and rule induction: a unified view. Knowledge and Cognition 1974, 105-128. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. L. Gregg (Ed.).
42. Sloman S.A. Two systems of reasoning. Heuristics and Biases 2002, 379-396. Cambridge University Press, New York. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
43. Smith E.R., DeCoster J. Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2000, 4:108-131.
44. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-665.
45. Tetlock P.E. Accountability: the neglected social context of judgment and choice. Research in Organizational Behavior 1985, 7:297-332.
46. Tetlock P.E., Kim L.I. Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52(4):700-709.
47. Thaler R.H., Johnson E. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science 1990, 36:643-660.
48. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185(4157):1124-1131.
49. Von Neumann J., Morgensten O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1944, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
50. Warner L.G., DeFleur M.L. Attitudes as an interactional concept: social constraint and social distance as intervening variables between attitudes and actions. American Sociological Review 1969, 34(2):153-169.