Community design and how much we drive

Journal of Transport and Land Use

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 5-21

  Marshall, Wesley E ^a   Garrick, Norman W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871258328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19387849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.301     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bartholomew, K. and R. Ewing. 2009. Land-use transportation scenarios and future vehicle travel and land consumption: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1): 13-27.
2. Cervero, R. and R. Gorham. 1995. Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(2): 210-225.
3. Cervero, R. and K. Kockelman 1997. Travel demand and the 3 ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3): 199-219.
4. Crane, R., 1996. Cars and drivers in the new suburbs: Linking access to travel in neotraditional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62: 51-65.
5. Crane, R. and R. Crepeau. 1998. Does neighborhood design influence travel? Behavioral analysis of travel diary and GIS data. http://www.uctc.net/papers/374.pdf.
6. Curtis, F., L. Neilsen, et al. 1984. Impact of residential street design on fuel consumption. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 110: 1-8.
7. Environmental Protection Agency, 2005. Emission Facts: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Washington, DC. PA420-F-05-004.
8. Ewing, R., 1996. Best Development Practices: Doing the Right Thing and Making Money at the Same Time. Washington, DC: APA Planners Press.
9. Ewing, R., R. Pendall, et al. 2003. Measuring Sprawl and its transportation impacts. Transportation Research Record, 1832: 175-193.
10. Frank, L. D., B. Stone Jr., and W. Bachman. 2000. Linking land use with household vehicle emissions in the central puget sound: methodological framework and findings. Transportation Research Part D, 5(3): 173-196.
11. Graham, D. and S. Glaister. 2003. Spatial variation in road pedestrian casualties: The role of urban scale, density and land-use mix. Urban Studies, 40(8): 1591-1607.
12. Handy, S., R. Paterson, et al. 2003. Planning for Street Connectivity: Getting from Here to There. Planning Advisory Service Report 515, American Planning Association.
13. Heres-Del-Valle, D. and D. Niemeier. 2011. CO2 emissions: Are land-use changes enough for California to reduce VMT? Specification of a two-part model with instrumental variables. Transportation Research Part B, 41(1): 150-161.
14. Hillier, B. and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Holtzclaw, J., 1994. Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs. San Francisco, Natural Resources Defense Council.
16. Jiang, B. and C. Claramunt. 2004. A structural approach to the model generalization of an urban street network. GeoInformatica, 8(2): 157-171.
17. Kulash, W., 1990. Traditional neighborhood development: Will the traffic work? URL http://user.gru.net/domz/kulash.htm.
18. Litman, T., 2005. Roadway Connectivity: Creating More Connected Roadway and Pathway Networks. URL http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm116.htm.
19. Marshall, S., 2005. Streets & Patterns. New York: Spon Press.
20. Marshall, W., N. Garrick, et al., 2008. Reassessing on-street parking. Transportation Research Record, 2046: 45-52.
21. Mindali, O., A. Raveh, et al. 2004. Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A, 38: 143-162.
22. Moeller, D. 1992. Environmental Health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Newman and Kentworthy. 1989. Cities and Automobile Dependence. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
24. Noland, R. and M. Quddus. 2004. A spatially disaggregate analysis of road casualties in England. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 36(6): 973-984.
25. Oliver, M., 1990. Kriging: A method of interpolation for geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 4: 312-332.
26. Peponis, J., D. Allen, et al. 2007. Measuring the configuration of street networks: the spatial profiles of 118 urban areas in the 12 most populated metropolitan regions in the U.S. 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey.
27. Portland Metro. 2004. Street Connectivity: An Evaluation of Case Studies in the Portland Region. URL http://library.oregonmetro.gov/files/connectivityreport.pdf.
28. Raford, N., A. Chiaradia, et al., 2007. Space Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London. Institute of Transportation Studies: UC Berkeley Traffic Safety Center.
29. Ratti, C., 2004. Space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31: 487-499.
30. Schrank, D. and T. Lomax 2009. 2009 Urban Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute.
31. Southworth, M. and E. Ben-Joseph.1997. Street and the Shaping of Towns and Cities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Su, Q., 2010. Travel demand in the US urban areas: A system dynamic panel data approach. Transportation Research Part A, 44(2): 110-117.
33. Taylor, J., 2001. Transportation and community design: The effects of land use and street pattern on travel behavior. http://www.sustainable-communities.agsci.ubc.ca/bulletins/TB_issue_11_Transportation_edit.pdf.
34. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2010. Petroleum Navigator. http://www.eia.doe.gov/.