Travel demand in the US urban areas: A system dynamic panel data approach

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 110-117

  Su, Qing ^a  

^a NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Population density; Road density; System dynamic panel data estimator; Travel demand; Urban congestion

Indexed keywords

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; ROADS AND STREETS;

POPULATION DENSITIES; ROAD DENSITY; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN CONGESTION;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

PANEL DATA; POPULATION DENSITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND; URBAN AREA; URBAN POPULATION; URBAN TRANSPORT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 73749087192     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2009.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arellano M., and Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58 (1991) 277-297
2. Arellano M., and Bover O. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1995) 29-51
3. Baltagi B. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2005), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, England
4. Baltagi B., and Griffin J. Pooled estimators v.s. their heterogeneous counterparts in the con-text of dynamic demand for gasoline. Journal of Econometrics 77 (1997) 303-327
5. Baltagi B., and Griffin J. Gasoline demand in the OECD: an application of pooling and testing procedures. European Economic Review 22 (1983) 117-137
6. Baltagi B., Griffin J., and Xiong W. To pool or not pool: homogenous versus heterogeneous estimators applied to cigarette demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82 (2000) 117-126
7. Bento A., Cropper M., Mobarak A., and Vinha K. The impact of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2005) 466-478
8. Bhat C.R., and Guo J. A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transportation Research, Part B: Methodological 41 5 (2007) 506-526
9. Blundell R., and Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87 (1998) 115-143
10. Cao X., Mokhtarian P., and Handy S. Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior a structural equations modeling approach. Transportation 34 5 (2007) 535-556
11. Cervero, R., 2000. Road supply-demand relationships: sorting out causal linkages. Transportation Research Board 80th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC.
12. Cervero R. Transit-based housing in California: evidence on ridership impacts. Transportation Policy 1 3 (1994) 174-183
13. Cervero R., and Kockelman K. Travel demand and three Ds: density, diversity, and design Transportation Research Part D:. Transport and Environment 2 3 (1997) 199-219
14. Chen C., Hongmian G., and Paaswell R. Role of the built environment on mode choice decisions: additional evidence on the impact of density. Transportation 35 (2008) 285-299
15. Duany A., Plater-Zyberk E., and Speck J. Suburb Nation: The Rise of Urban Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream (2000), North Point Press
16. Ewing R., and Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a synthesis. Transportation Research Record 1780 (2001) 87-114
17. Energy Information Administration, 2007. State and US Historic Data. (01.03.08).
18. Federal Highway Administration, Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit, 2004 Conditions and Performance. (accessed 18.10.06).
19. Federal Highway Administration, 2007. Highway Statistics. (accessed 10.07.08).
20. Frank L., and Pivo G. Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single occupant vehicle, transit, walking. Transportation Research Record 1466 (1996) 44-52
21. Fulton, L., Meszler, D., Noland, R., Thomas, J., 2000. A statistical analysis of induced travel effects in the US Mid-Atlantic region. The 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (Paper No. 00-1289).
22. Hansen M. Road supply and traffic in California urban areas. Transportation Research Part A, Policy and Practice 31 (1997) 205-218
23. Hausman J., and Taylor W. Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49 (1981) 1377-1398
24. Hughes, J., Knittel, C., Sperling, D., 2006. Evidence of a Shift in the Short-run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 12530. (accessed 06.04.07).
25. Parry I., and Small K. Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax. American Economic Review 95 (2005) 1276-1289
26. Kockelman K. Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land-use mixing, and land-use balance evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Research Record 1607 (1997) 116-125
27. Miller E., and Ibrahim A. Urban forms and vehicular travel: some empirical findings. Transportation Research Record 1617 (1998) 18-27
28. Mindali O., Raveh A., and Salomon I. Urban density and energy consumption: a new look at old statistics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 38 (2004) 143-162
29. Newman P., and Kenworthy J. Cities and automobile dependence: an international source book (1989), Avebury Technical, England
30. Noland R. Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel. Transpor-tation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (2001) 47-72
31. Schimek P. Household vehicle ownership and use: how much does residential density matter. Transportation Research Record 1552 (1996) 120-130
32. Schrank, D., Lomax, T., 2005. Urban Mobility Report. (accessed 18.10.08).
33. Schrank, D., Lomax, T., 2007. Urban Mobility Report. (accessed 01.10.09).
34. Small K., and Van Dender K. Fuel efficiency and motor vehicle travel: the declining rebound effect. The Energy Journal 28 1 (2007) 25-51
35. Sweeney, J., 1978. The demand for gasoline in the United States: a vintage capital model. In: Workshops on Energy and Supply and Demand. International Energy Agency, Paris, pp. 240-277.
36. Texas Transportation Institute, 2006. Surface Transportation Policy Project. (accessed 01.10.07).
37. US Bureau of Census, Decennial Census, 2006.
38. Zhang M. The role of land use in travel mode choice - evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. Journal of American Planning Association 70 3 (2004) 344-360