How GIS can help address the uncertain geographic context problem in social science research

Annals of GIS

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 245-255

  Kwan, Mei Po ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

environmental health; geographic context; neighborhood effects; UGCoP; uncertain geographic context problem

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; GIS; GPS; HUMAN ACTIVITY; NEIGHBORHOOD; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 84871170677     PISSN: 19475683     EISSN: 19475691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19475683.2012.727867     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Arcury, T.A. 2005. The effects of geography and spatial behavior on health care utilization among the residents of rural region. Health Services Research, 40(1): 135-155.
2. Basta, L.A., Richmond, T.S. and Wiebe, D.J. 2010. Neighborhoods, daily activities, and measuring health risks experienced in urban environments. Social Science & Medicine, 71(11): 1943-1950.
3. Berke, E.M. 2007. Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons. American Journal of Public Health, 97(3): 486-492.
4. Browning, C.R. 2010. Commercial density, residential concentration, and crime: land use patterns and violence in neighborhood context. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47: 329-357.
5. Brownson, R.C. 2004. Measuring the environment for friendliness toward physical activity: a comparison of the reliability of 3 questionnaires. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3): 473-483.
6. Burnett, P. and Hanson, S. 1982. The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behavior in spatially-constrained situations: definition and measurement issues. Transportation Research A, 16(2): 87-102.
7. Chaix, B. 2009. Geographic life environments and coronary heart disease: a literature review. Theoretical contributions, methodological updates, and a research agenda. Annual Review of Public Health, 30: 81-105.
8. Chaix, B. 2012. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(4): 440-450.
9. Cook, T.D. 2003. The case for studying multiple contexts simultaneously. Addiction, 98(Suppl. 1): 151-155.
10. Couclelis, H. 2003. The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS, 7(2): 165-175.
11. Cressie, N. 1996. Change of support and the modifiable areal unit problem. Geographical Systems, 3: 159-180.
12. Cummins, S. 2007. Investigating neighborhood effects on health-avoiding the 'local trap'. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36: 355-357.
13. Curtis, S. and Jones, I.R. 1998. Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality?. Sociology of Health & Illness, 20(5): 645-672.
14. Dietz, R.D. 2002. The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: an interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31(4): 539-575.
15. Diez Roux, A.V. 1998. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 88(2): 216-222.
16. Diez Roux, A.V. 2001. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11): 1783-1789.
17. Diez Roux, A.V. and Mair, C. 2010. Neighborhood and health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186: 125-145.
18. Duncan, M.J., Badland, H.M. and Mummery, W.K. 2009. Applying GPS to enhance understanding of transport-related physical activity. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(5): 549-556.
19. Elgethun, K. 2003. Time-location analysis for exposure assessment studies of children using a novel global positioning system instrument. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111(1): 115-122.
20. Entwisle, B. 2007. Putting people into place. Demography, 44(4): 687-703.
21. Flowerdew, R., Manley, D.J. and Sabel, C.E. 2008. Neighbourhood effects on health: does it matter where you draw the boundaries?. Social Science & Medicine, 66: 1241-1555.
22. Fotheringham, A.S. and Wong, D.W.S. 1991. The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7): 1025-1044.
23. Frank, L.D. 2005. Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form-findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28: 117-125.
24. Galster, G. 2001. On the nature of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12): 2111-2124.
25. Gatrell, A.C. 2011. Mobilities and health, Aldershot: Ashgate.
26. Gulliver, J. and Briggs, D.J. 2005. Time-space modeling of journey-time exposure to traffic-related air pollution using GIS. Environmental research, 97: 10-25.
27. Guo, D. 2008. Regionalization with dynamically constrained agglomerative clustering and partitioning (REDCAP). International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22: 801-823.
28. Guo, D. and Wang, H. 2011. Automatic region building for spatial analysis. Transactions in GIS, 15(s1): 29-45.
29. Hanson, S. and Hanson, P. 1981. The travel-activity patterns of urban residents: dimensions and relationships to sociodemographic characteristics. Economic Geography, 57: 332-347.
30. Hipp, J. 2007. Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72: 659-680.
31. Hipp, J. and Boessen, A., 2012. Living in your own private Idaho: egohoods as a new measure of neighborhood [online]. http://www.irle.berkeley.edu/culture/conf2012/hipp_boessen12.pdf(Accessed: 21 September 2012).
32. Holt, D. 1996. Aggregation and ecological effects in geographically based data. Geographical Analysis, 28: 244-261.
33. Inagmi, S., Cohen, D.A. and Finch, B.K. 2007. Non-residential neighborhood exposures suppress neighborhood effects on self-rated health. Social Science & Medicine, 65: 1779-1791.
34. Johnston, R.J. 2005. Spatial scale and the neighborhood effect: multinomial models of voting at two recent British general elections. British Journal of Political Science, 35(4): 487-514.
35. Johnston, R.J. 2007. Region, local context, and voting at the 1997 general election in England. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3): 640-654.
36. Kawachi, I. and Berkman, L.F., eds. 2003. Neighborhoods and health, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Knigge, L. and Cope, M. 2006. Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A, 38(11): 2021-2037.
38. Kwan, M.-P. 1999. Gender and individual access to urban opportunities: a study using space-time measures. The Professional Geographer, 51(2): 210-227.
39. Kwan, M.-P. 2000. Interactive geovisualization of activity-travel patterns using three-dimensional geographical information systems: a methodological exploration with a large data set. Transportation Research C, 8: 185-203.
40. Kwan, M.-P. 2004. GIS methods in time-geographic research: geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns. Geografiska Annaler B, 86(4): 267-280.
41. Kwan, M.-P. 2009. From place-based to people-based exposure measures. Social Science & Medicine, 69(9): 1311-1313.
42. Kwan, M.-P. 2012. The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5): 958-968.
43. Kwan, M.-P. and Ding, G. 2008. Geo-narrative: extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer, 60(4): 443-465.
44. Kwan, M.-P. 2008. "Reconceptualizing sociogeographic context for the study of drug use, abuse, and addiction". In Geography and drug addiction, Edited by: Thomas, Y., Richardson, D. and Cheung, I. 437-446. New York: Springer. In
45. Kwan, M.-P. Activity-space measures for studying spatial crime and social isolation. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers (AAG). March22-27. Las Vegas, NV
46. Kwan, M.-P. 2011. "Sociogeographic context, pro-tobacco advertising, and smokeless tobacco usage in the Appalachian Region of Ohio (USA)". In Paper presented at the 2011 International Medical Geography Symposium, 10-15 July Durham, UK
47. Lam, N.S. 2012. Geospatial methods for reducing uncertainties in environmental health risk assessment: challenges and opportunities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5): 942-950.
48. Lee, B.A. 2008. Beyond the census tract: patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73: 766-791.
49. MacAllister, I. 2001. Class dealignment and the neighborhood effect: Miller revisited. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1): 41-49.
50. Macintyre, S. 1997. "What are spatial effects and how can we measure them? In". In Exploring national survey data: the role of locality and spatial effects, Edited by: Dale, A. 1-17. University of Manchester.
51. Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A. and Cummins, S. 2002. Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?. Social Science & Medicine, 55: 125-139.
52. Manley, D., Flowerdew, R. and Steel, D. 2006. Scales, levels and processes: studying spatial patterns of British census variables. Computers, Environments and Urban Systems, 30(2): 143-160.
53. Matthews, S.A. 2008. The salience of neighborhood: some lessons from sociology. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(3): 257-259.
54. Matthews, S.A. 2011. "Spatial polygamy and the heterogeneity of place: studying people and place via egocentric methods". In Communities, neighborhoods, and health: expanding the boundaries of place, Edited by: Burton, L. 35-55. New York: Springer. In
55. Matthews, S.A., Detwiler, A.J. and Burton, L. 2005. Geo-ethnography: coupling geographic information analysis techniques and ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica, 40(4): 75-90.
56. Mobley, L.R., Kuo, T.M. and Andrews, L. 2008. How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context? A case study of mammography use in California. Medical Care Research and Review, 65(3): 315-337.
57. Mu, L. and Wang, F. 2008. A scale-space clustering method: mitigating the effect of scale in the analysis of zone-based data. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98: 85-101.
58. Oliver, L.N. and Hayes, M.V. 2007. Does choice of spatial units matter for estimating small-area disparities in health and place effects n the Vancouver Census Metropolitan Area. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(Suppl. 1): 27-34.
59. Oliver, L.N., Schuurman, N. and Hall, A.W. 2007. Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. International Journal of Health Geographics, 6: 41
60. Openshaw, S. 1984. The modifiable areal unit problem, Norwich: Geo Books.
61. Openshaw, S. 1996. "Developing GIS-relevant zone-based spatial analysis methods". In Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment, Edited by: Longley, P. and Batty, M. 55-73. New York: Wiley. In
62. Pickett, K.E. and Pearl, M. 2001. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: a critical review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55: 111-122.
63. Rainham, D. 2008. Development of a wearable global positioning system for place and health research. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7: 59
64. Rainham, D. 2010. Conceptualizing the healthscape: contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research. Social Science & Medicine, 70: 668-676.
65. Riva, M. 2009. Disentangling the relative influence of built and socioeconomic environments on walking: the contribution of areas homogenous along exposures of interest. Social Science & Medicine, 69(9): 1296-1305.
66. Root, E.D. 2012. Moving neighborhoods and health research forward: using geographic methods to examine the role of spatial scale in neighborhood effects on health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5): 986-995.
67. Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. and Earls, F. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277: 918-924.
68. Sampson, R.J., Morenoff, J.D. and Gannon-Rowley, T. 2002. Assessing "neighborhood effects": social processes and new directions in research. The Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 443-478.
69. Setton, E. 2010. Gender differences in chronic exposure to traffic-related air pollution-a simulation study of working females and males. The Professional Geographer, 62(1): 66-83.
70. Sherman, J.E. 2005. A suite of methods for representing activity space in a healthcare accessibility study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 4: 24
71. Shi, W. 2010. Principles of modeling uncertainties in spatial data and spatial analyses, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
72. Shoval, N. 2011. Use of the global positioning system to measure the out-of-home mobility of older adults with differing cognitive functioning. Ageing & Society, 31: 849-869.
73. Sorensen, G. 2004. Reducing social disparities in tobacco use: a socialcontextual model for reducing tobacco use among blue-collar workers. American Journal of Public Health, 94: 230-239.
74. Troped, P.J. 2010. The built environment and location-based physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(4): 429-438.
75. Vallée, J. 2010. The combined effects of activity space and neighborhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: the case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France). Health & Place, 16: 838-852.
76. van Ham, M. 2012. Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer.
77. Wang, F., Guo, D. and McLafferty, S. 2012. Constructing geographic areas for cancer data analysis: a case study on late-stage breast cancer risk in Illinois. Applied Geography, 35(1-2): 1-11.
78. Wang, S. 2010. A cyberGIS framework for the synthesis of cyberinfrastructure, GIS, and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(3): 535-557.
79. Weiss, L. 2007. Defining neighborhood boundaries for urban health research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(6S): S154-S159.
80. Wiehe, S.E. 2008. Adolescent travel patterns: pilot data indicating distance from home varies by time of day and day of week. Journal of Adolescent Health, 42: 418-420.
81. Wilks, D. 2010. Objectively measured physical activity and obesity prevention in children, adolescents and adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Obesity Reviews, 12(5): 119-129.
82. Wong, D.W.S. and Lee, J. 2005. Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS, New York: Wiley.
83. Yuill, R.S. 1971. The standard deviational ellipse: an updated tool for spatial description. Geografiska Annaler B, 53: 28-39.
84. Zenk, S.N. 2011. Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study. Health & Place, 17(5): 1150-1161.