Dynamic Bayesian Network for Probabilistic Modeling of Tunnel Excavation Processes

Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-21

  Špačková, Olga ^a   Straub, Daniel ^b  

^a CZECH TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION PROCESS; DYNAMIC BAYESIAN NETWORKS; EXTERNAL FACTORS; NEW AUSTRIAN TUNNELING METHOD; PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENTS; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; ROAD TUNNEL; STOCHASTIC DEPENDENCIES; TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL EXCAVATION;

ALGORITHMS; TUNNELING (EXCAVATION);

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

ALGORITHM; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; ROAD TRANSPORT; STOCHASTICITY; TUNNEL; TUNNELING;

EID: 84870919402     PISSN: 10939687     EISSN: 14678667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00759.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aldorf, J. (2010), Underground construction projects in the Czech Republic: completed, under construction and planned from 2004, Tunel, 19(2), 83-99.
2. Barták, J. (2007), Underground Construction in the Czech Republic, Monograph, SATRA, Prague
3. Benardos, A. G. & Kaliampakos, D. C. (2004), Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19, 597-605.
4. Chan, M. H. C. (1981). A geological prediction and updating model in tunneling. M.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
5. Cheung, S. H. & Beck, J. L. (2010), Calculation of posterior probabilities for Bayesian model class assessment and averaging from posterior samples based on dynamic system data, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25, 304-21.
6. Chung, T. H., Mohamed, Y. & AbouRizk, S. (2006), Bayesian updating application into simulation in the north Edmonton sanitary trunk project, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 8, 882-94.
7. Droguett, E. L., Moura, M. C., Jacinto, C. M. & Silva, M. F. (2008), A semi-Markov model with Bayesian belief network based human error probability for availability assessment of downhole optical monitoring system, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16, 1713-27.
8. Eskesen, S. D., Tengborg, P., Kampmann, J. & Veicherts, T. (2004), Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 19, 217-37.
9. Faber, M. H., Kroon, I. B., Kragh, E., Bayly, D. & Decosemaeker, P. (2002), Risk assessment of decommissioning options using Bayesian networks, Journal of Offshore Mechanical Arctic Engineering, 124(4), 231-38.
10. Flyvbjerg, B., Holm, M. K. S. & Buhl, S. L. (2004), What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects Transport Reviews, 24, 3-18.
11. Grasso, P., Xu, S., Pescara, M., Russo, G. & Repetto, L. (2006), A methodology for the geotechnical design of long high-speed rail tunnels under the conditions of uncertainty, in Proceedings of the ITA-Sponsored China International Symposium on High-Speed Railway Tunnels, Beijing, China
12. Grêt-Regamey A. & Straub D. (2006), Spatially explicit avalanche risk assessment linking Bayesian networks to a GIS, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6(6), 911-26.
13. Hong, E.-S., Lee, I.-M., Shin, H.-S., Nam, S.-W. & Kong, J.-S. (2009), Quantitative risk evaluation based on event tree analysis technique: application to the design of shield TBM, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 24(2009), 269-77.
14. IMIA (The International Association of Engineering Insurers) (2006), ALOP/DSU coverage for tunnelling risks? The International Association of Engineering Insurers 39th Annual Conference - Boston. Available at: http://www.imia.com/downloads/imia_papers/wgp48_2006.pdf, accessed February 21, 2012.
15. ITA (International Tunnelling Association) (2009), General report on conventional tunneling.
16. Isaksson, T. & Stille, H. (2005). Model for estimation of time and cost for tunnel project based on risk, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 23, 373-98.
17. Jensen, F. V. & Nielsen, T. D. (2007), Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn., Springer, New York, USA
18. Lombardi, G. (2001), Geotechnical risks for project financing of tunnels in non-urban areas. Tribune 20, International Tunnelling Association Newsletter.
19. Min, S. (2008), Development of the resource model for Decision Aids for Tunnelling (DAT). Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
20. Min, S. Y. (2003), The application of Decision Aids for Tunneling (DAT) to the Sucheon tunnel in Korea. M.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
21. Min, S. Y., Einstein, H. H., Lee, J. S. & Kim, T. K. (2003), Application of decision aids for tunneling (DAT) to a drill & blast tunnel, Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, 7, 619-28.
22. Min, S. Y., Kim, T. K., Lee, J. S. & Einstein H. H. (2008), Design and construction of road tunnel in Korea including application of the Decision Aids for Tunneling -A case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 91-102.
23. th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 788-96.
24. Murphy, K. P. (2002), Dynamic Bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California
25. Neil, M., Tailor, M., Marquez, D., Fenton, N. & Hearty, P. (2008), Modelling dependable systems using hybrid Bayesian networks, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 933-39.
26. Reilly, J. J. (2005), Cost Estimating and Risk-Management for Underground Projects. Underground Space Use: Analysis of the Past and Lessons for the Future, Taylor & Francis Group, London
27. Ruwanpura, J. Y. & Ariaratnam, S. T. (2007), Simulation modelling techniques for underground infrastructure construction processes, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 22, 553-67.
28. Shahriar, K., Sharifzadeh, M. & Hamidi, J. K. (2008), Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23(2008), 318-25.
29. Singh, B. & Goel, R. (1999), Rock Mass Classification: A Practical Approach in Civil Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
30. Sousa, R. L. (2010), Risk anpalysis of tunneling projects. Dissertation thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
31. Sousa, R. L. & Einstein, H. H. (2012), Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian networks: Porto Metro case study, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 27, 86-100.
32. Špačková, O., Ebermann, T., Kostohryz, O., Veselý, V. & Šejnoha, J. (2010), Expert estimation of probability of failure during tunnel excavation, Tunel, 19(4), 15-23.
33. Špačková, O. & Straub, D. (2011), Probabilistic risk assessment of excavation performance in tunnel projects using Bayesian networks: a case study, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety and Risk, Mnchen, pp. 651-60.
34. Straub, D. (2009), Stochastic modeling of deterioration processes through dynamic Bayesian networks, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 135(10), 1089-99.
35. Straub, D. & Der Kiureghian, A. (2010a), Bayesian networks enhanced with structural reliability methods. Part B: methodology. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Transactions ASCE, 136(10), 1248-58.
36. Straub, D. & Der Kiureghian, A. (2010b), Bayesian networks enhanced with structural reliability methods. Part B: application, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Transactions ASCE, 136(10), 1259-70.
37. Sturk, R., Olsson, L. & Johansson, J. (1996), Risk and decision analysis for large underground projects, as applied to the Stockholm ring road tunnels, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 11, 157-64.
38. Walker, J. S. 1996. Fast Fourier Transforms, 2nd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
39. Weber, P., Medina-Oliva, G., Simon, C. & Iung, B. (2010). Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.06.002.
40. Yang, I. T. (2007), Risk modelling of dependence among project task durations, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22, 419-29.