Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Van Der Weegen, Walter ^a   Hoekstra, Henk J ^a   Sijbesma, Thea ^a   Austen, Shennah ^a   Poolman, Rudolf W ^b  

^a ST ANNA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adverse reaction to metal debris; Hip resurfacing; Implant survival; ReCap design

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEBRIDEMENT; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL HOSPITAL; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RESURFACING; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NERVE INJURY; PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; SURGICAL INFECTION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HOSPITALS, DISTRICT; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84870910892     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-247     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Levels of metal ions after small- and large- diameter metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clarke MT, Lee PT, Arora A, Villar RN, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003 85 913 917 12931818 (Pubitemid 36986860)
2. Metal-on-metal bearings total hip arthroplasty: the cobalt and chromium ions release concern. Delaunay C, Petit I, Learmonth ID, Oger P, Vendittoli PA, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010 96 894 904 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.05.008 20832379
3. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, Nargol AV, De Smet KA, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 93 164 171 10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099 21282753
4. Exposure to chromium, cobalt and molybdenum from metal-on-metal total hip replacement and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Witzleb WC, Ziegler J, Krummenauer F, Neumeister V, Guenther KP, Acta Orthop 2006 77 697 705 10.1080/17453670610012863 17068698 (Pubitemid 44521907)
5. Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision. Prosser GH, Yates PJ, Wood DJ, Graves SE, de Steiger RN, Miller LN, Acta Orthop 2010 81 66 71 10.3109/17453671003685434 20180719
6. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. van der Weegen W, Hoekstra HJ, Sijbesma T, Bos E, Schemitsch EH, Poolman RW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 93 298 306 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25594 21357949
7. First experiences with total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Gagała J, Mazurkiewicz T, Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2007 72 311 317 Article in Polish 18092692
8. Two-year migration results of the ReCap hip resurfacing system-a radiostereometric follow-up study of 23 hips. Baad-Hansen T, Storgaard Jakobsen S, Soballe K, Int Orthop 2011 35 497 502 10.1007/s00264-010-0976-x 20195597
9. Hip and knee arthroplasty: annual report, 2010. Australian orthopaedic association, national joint registry http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr (date last accessed 27 June 2012)
10. Hip resurfacing with the Biomet hybrid ReCap-magnum system: 7-year results. Gross TP, Liu F, J Arthroplasty 2012 [Epub ahead of print]
11. National institute for clinical excellence (NICE). guidance on the selection of primary total hip replacement London 2003 http://www.nice.org.uk (date last accessed 25 June 2012)
12. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Harris WH, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969 51 737 755 5783851
13. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 418 87 93 15043098 (Pubitemid 38140428)
14. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. DeLee JG, Charnley J, Clin Orthop 1976 121 20 32 991504 (Pubitemid 8003188)
15. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973 55 1629 1632 4217797
16. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Murray DW, Gill HS, Oxford Hip and Knee Group, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010 92 1527 1534 10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.24640 21037347
17. The failure of survivorship. Wylde V, Blom AW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 93 569 570 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.26687 21511918
18. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 1291 1297 Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91:700 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20533 18827237
19. Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Hart AJ, Buddhdev P, Winship P, Faria N, Powell JJ, Skinner JA, Hip Int 2008 18 212 219 18924077
20. Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing. Desy NM, Bergeron SG, Petit A, Huk OL, Antoniou J, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011 469 1635 1641 10.1007/s11999-010-1636-6 20972653
21. Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. Langton DJ J, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011 93 1011 1016 10.1302/0301-620X.93B8.26040 21768621
22. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: 10-year Newcastle experience. Malviya A, Holland JP, Acta Orthop Belg 2009 75 477 483 19774814
23. A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. Beaulé PE, Kim PR, Powell J, Mackenzie J, Werle J, Antoniou J, Huk O, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Smith F, Naudie D, McCalden R, Bourne R, Schemitsch E, Garbuz D, Greidanus N, Duncan C, Belzile E, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011 93 118 121 10.2106/JBJS.J.01848 21543700
24. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009 91 1566 1574 10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.22287 19949118
25. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J, Beard DJ, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW, Gill HS, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008 90 436 441 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648 18378915 (Pubitemid 351542858)
26. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002 84 171 177 11861721 (Pubitemid 37127476)
27. What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty? minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011 469 209 217 10.1007/s11999-010-1459-5 20625950
28. National joint registry for England and Wales: 7th annual report 2010 http://www.njr.centre.org.uk/njrcentre/AbouttheNJR/Publications and reports/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.apx (date last accessed 30 may 2012)
29. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Natu S, Nargol TV, J Arthroplasty 2008 23 50 55 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.019 18555643
30. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M, J Arthroplasty 2008 23 44 49 18722302
31. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? what do they not tell us? Corten K, MacDonald SJ, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010 468 351 357 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3 20012720
32. The influence of the size of the component on the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a review of the literature. Shimmin AJ, Walter WL, Esposito C, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010 92 469 476 20357319
33. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, Choi ES, Fowble VA, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005 441 200 204 10.1097/01.blo.0000192354.76792.bb 16331003 (Pubitemid 44384221)