The Interactive Stance

The Interactive Stance

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-432

  Ginzburg, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Context; Conversational genres; Conversational interaction; Dialogue; Ellipsis; Relevance; Repair; Semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870886996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (324)

1. Allen, James (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals.. Communications of the ACM, 26, 832-43.
2. Allen, James and Perrault, Ray (1980) Analyzing intention in utterances.. Artificial Intelligence, 15, 143-78.
3. Allwood, Jens (1976). Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation, Volume 2, Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics. Sweden: Göteborg University.
4. Allwood, Jens (1978). On the analysis of communicative action. In M. Brenner (ed.), The Structure of Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Allwood, Jens (1995). An activity based approach to pragmatics. Technical report, Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 76. Reprinted in Harry C. Bunt et al. (2000), Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Allwood, Jens (1999). The Swedish spoken language corpus at Göteborg University. In Proceedings of Fonetik 99, Volume 81, Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics.
7. Aloni, Maria, Butler, Alistair, and Dekker, Paul (eds.) (2006). Questions in Dynamic Semantics, Volume 17, Current Research in the Semantics/ Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Aqvist, Lennart (1965). A New Approach to the Logic of Interrogatives. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.
9. Ariel, Mira (2008). Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Asher, Nicholas (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in English: a Philosophical Semantics for Natural Language Metaphysics. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
11. Asher, Nicholas (1996). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. In Fracas Deliverable D15. Edinburgh: The Fracas Consortium, Centre for Cognitive Science.
12. Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex (1998) Questions in dialogue.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21(3), 237-309.
13. Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex (2001) Indirect speech acts.. Synthese, 128(1), 183-228.
14. Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Austin, John L. (1961). Truth. In J. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Paper originally published in 1950.
16. Bakhtin, Mikhail (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
17. Barr, Dale J. (2008) Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground.. Cognition, 109(1), 18-40.
18. Barwise, Jon (1985). Noun phrases, generalized quantifiers, and anaphora. In P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1-30.
19. Barwise, Jon (1989a). The Situation in Logic. CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
20. Barwise, Jon (1989b). Situations, facts, and true propositions. In J. Barwise (ed.), The Situation in Logic. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
21. Barwise, Jon and Cooper, Robin (1981) Generalized quantifiers in natural language.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(2), 159-219.
22. Barwise, Jon and Etchemendy, John (1987). The Liar. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Barwise, Jon and Perry, John (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
24. Behavioural and Brain Sciences (2004). Commentary on Pickering and Garrod's paper. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27, special issue.
25. Beyssade, Claire and Marandin, Jean-Marie (2006). From complex to simple speech acts: a bidimensional analysis of illocutionary forces. In R. Fernandez and D. Schlangen (eds.), Proceedings of BranDial: the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Potsdam. University of Potsdam.
26. Beyssade, Claire and Marandin, Jean-Marie (2007a). French intonation and attitude attribution. In P. Denis, E. McCready, A. Palmer, and B. Reese (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Issues at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Austin: University of Texas, 1-24.
27. Beyssade, Claire and Marandin, Jean-Marie (2007b). The speech act assignment problem revisited: disentangling speaker's commitment from speaker's call on addressee. In O. Bonami and P. Cabredo-Hoffher (eds.), Empirical Studies in Syntax and Semantics 6, 37-68.
28. Bloom, Lois, Merkin, Susan, and Wooten, Janet (1982) Whquestions: Linguistic factors that contribute to the sequence of acquisition.. Child Development, 53, 1084-92.
29. Boër, Steven and Lycan, William (1985). Knowing Who. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books/ MIT Press.
30. Borg, Emma (2007). Minimal Semantics. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Bos, Johan (1995). Predicate logic unplugged. In Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
32. Branigan, Holly, Pickering, Martin, and Cleland, Alexandra (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue.. Cognition, 75, 13-25.
33. Bratman, Michael (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Reprinted in 1999 by CSLI Publications.
34. Brennan, Susan E. and Clark, Herbert H. (1996) Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.. Learning, Memory, 22(6), 1482-93.
35. Brennan, Susan E. and Hanna, Joy (2009) Partner-specific adaptation in dialogue.. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 274-91.
36. Brennan, Susan E. and Hulteen, Eric (1995) Interaction and feedback in a spoken language system: a theoretical framework.. Knowledge-Based Systems, 8, 143-51.
37. Brennan, Susan E. and Schober, Michael F. (2001) How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech.. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 274-96.
38. Brown, Margaret P. and Dell, Gary S. (1987) Adapting production to comprehension: the explicit mention of instruments.. Cognitive Psychology, 19(4), 441-72.
39. Brown, Roger (1973). A First Language: the Early Stages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
40. Brown, Roger and Hanlon, Camille (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition. In J. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language. London: John Wiley, 11-53.
41. Brown-Schmidt, Sarah and Tanenhaus, Michael K. (2008) Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: a targeted language game approach.. Cognitive Science, 32(4), 643-84.
42. Burnard, Lou (2000). Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (World Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services.
43. Calder, Jonathan, Klein, Ewan, and Zeevat, Henk (1988). Unification categorial grammar: a concise, extendable grammar for natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 1, COLING '88. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 83-6.
44. Cappelen, Herman and LePore, Ernie (2005). Insensitive Semantics: a Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
45. Carberry, Sandra (1991). Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
46. Carletta, Jean, Isard, Amy, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth, and Anderson, Anne (1996). Map Task coder's manual. Technical report, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
47. Carlson, Lauri (1983). Dialogue Games. Synthese Language Library. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
48. Carston, Robyn (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: the Pragmatics of Explicit Communication Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
49. Chater, Nick and Christiansen, Morten H. (2008) Language acquisition meets language evolution.. Cognitive Science, 34(7), 1131-57.
50. Chierchia, Gennaro (1995). Dynamics of Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Chomsky, Noam (1972). Language and Mind (enlarged edition). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
52. Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
53. Chomsky, Noam (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Chung, Sandy, Ladusaw, Bill, and McCloskey, James (1995) Sluicing and logical form.. Natural Language Semantics, 3(3), 239-82.
55. Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Clark, Herbert H. and Carlson, Thomas (1986). Hearers and speech acts. In H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 205-47. Reprinted from a 1982 paper in Language.
57. Clark, Herbert H. and FoxTree, Jean (2002) Using uh and um in spontaneous speech.. Cognition, 84, 73-111.
58. Clark, Herbert H. and Marshall, Catherine (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber, and I. A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Clark, Herbert H. and Schaefer, Edward (1989). Contributing to discourse. In H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 259-94. Reprinted from a paper in Cognitive Science.
60. Clark, Herbert H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. In H. Clark, Arenas of Language Use. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 107-43. Reprinted from a paper in Cognition.
61. Cohen, Ariel (1999). How are alternatives computed? Journal of Semantics, 16(1), 43.
62. Cohen, Philip and Perrault, Ray (1979) Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts.. Cognitive Science, 3, 177-212.
63. Constable, Robert (2002). Naive computational type theory. In H. Schwichtenberg and R. Steinbruggen (eds.), Proof and System-Reliability. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 213-59.
64. Cooper, Robin (1998a). Austinian propositions, Davidsonian events and perception complements. In J. Ginzburg, Z. Khasidashvili, J. J. Levy, C. Vogel, and E. Vallduví (eds.) The Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation: Selected Papers, Foundations of Logic, Language, and Information. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 19-34.
65. Cooper, Robin (1998b). Mixing situation theory and type theory to formalize information states in dialogue exchanges. In J. Hulstijn and A. Nijholt (eds.), Proceedings of TwenDial 98, 13th Twente Workshop on Language Technology. Twente: Twente University.
66. Cooper, Robin (2004). Dynamic generalised quantifiers and hypothetical contexts. In Ursus Philosophicus, A Festschrift for Björn Haglund. Göteborg: Göteborg University.
67. Cooper, Robin (2005a) Austinian truth in Martin-Lof type theory.. Research on Language and Computation, 3(4), 333-62.
68. Cooper, Robin (2005b) Records and record types in semantic theory.. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(2), 99-112.
69. Cooper, Robin (2006). A type theoretic approach to information state update in issue based dialogue management. Talk presented at Catalog'04, the 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, to appear in a volume edited by Larry Moss.
70. Cooper, Robin (2008). Type theory with records and unification-based grammar. In A Festschrift for Uwe Mönnich. Tubingen: Tubingen University.
71. Cooper, Robin (2011). Type theory and semantics in flux. In R. Kempson, N. Asher, and T. Fernando (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 14: Philosophy of Linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
72. Cooper, Robin and Ginzburg, Jonathan (2002). Clarification ellipsis in dependent type theory. In J. Bos and C. Matheson (eds.), Proceedings of Edilog, the 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Edinburgh.
73. Cooper, Robin and Ginzburg, Jonathan (2011). Negation in dialogue. In Ron Artstein et al. (eds), Proceedings of SEMDIAL 2011, University of Southern California.
74. Cooper, Robin and Kempson, Ruth (eds.) (2008). Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution. London: College Publications.
75. Cooper, Robin and Poesio, Massimo (1994). Situation theory. In Fracas Deliverable D8. Edinburgh: the Fracas Consortium, Centre for Cognitive Science.
76. Copestake, Ann, Flickinger, Dan, Pollard, Carl, and Sag, Ivan A. (2005) Minimal recursion semantics: an introduction.. Research on Language and Computation, 3(4), 281-332.
77. Coquand, Thierry, Pollack, Randy, and Takeyama, Makoto (2003) A logical framework with dependent types.. Fundamenta Informaticae, 20, 1-21.
78. Corblin, Francis (1994). Multiple negation processing. Technical report, Human Communication Research Center, University of Edinburgh.
79. Core, Mark and Allen, James (1997). Coding dialogs with the DAMSL scheme. In Working Notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, Boston, MA.
80. Cresswell, Max (1973). Logics and Languages. London: Methuen.
81. Culicover, Peter and Jackendoff, Ray (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Dabbs, James M. and Ruback, R. Barry (1987) Dimensions of group process: amount and structure of vocal interaction.. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 123-69.
83. Dalrymple, Mary (1999). Semantics and Syntax in Lexical Functional Grammar: the Resource Logic Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Dalrymple, Mary Pereira, Fernando, and Shieber, Stuart (1991) Ellipsis and higher order unification.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 399-452.
85. De Marinis, Marco (1993). The Semiotics of Performance. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
86. De Ruiter, Jan Peter, Mitterer, Holger, and Enfield, Nicholas J. (2006) Projecting the end of a speaker's turn: a cognitive cornerstone of conversation.. Language, 82(3), 515-35.
87. Dekker, Paul (1997). First order information exchange. In G. Jaeger and A. Benz (eds.), Proceedings of MunDial 97 (Technical Report 97-106). Universität München Centrum für Informationsund Sprachverarbeitung, München.
88. Dekker, Paul (2004) Optimal inquisitive discourse.. Research on Language and Computation, 2(3), 365-99.
89. Demetras, Marty, Post, Katherine, and Snow, Catherine (1986) Feedback to first language learners: the role of repetitions and clarification questions.. Journal of Child Language, 13, 275-92.
90. Duncan, Starkey (1972) Some signals and rules for taking turns in conversations.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), 283-92.
91. Elam, Keir (2002). The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London: Routledge.
92. Engdahl, Elisabet (1986). Constituent Questions. Synthese Language Library. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
93. Larsson, Staffan, and Ericsson, Stina (2000). Focus-ground articulation and parallelism in a dynamic model of dialogue. In Task Oriented Instructional Dialogue (TRINDI): Deliverable D4.1. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg. Available from #http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi#.
94. Epstein, Jason and Axtell, Robert (1996). Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
95. Eshghi, Arash and Healey, Pat (2006). Collective states of understanding. In S. Keizer, H. Bunt, and T. Paek (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Antwerp, Belgium, 2-9.
96. Fay, Nicholas, Garrod, Simon, and Carletta, Jean (2000) Group discussion as interactive dialogue or serial monologue.. Psychological Science, 11(6), 481-6.
97. Fernández, Raquel (2006). Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue: Classification, Resolution and Use. Ph.D. thesis, King's College, London.
98. Fernández, Raquel and Ginzburg, Jonathan (2002) Non-sentential utterances: a corpus study.. Traitement automatique des languages. Dialogue, 43(2), 13-42.
99. Fernández, Raquel and Ginzburg, Jonathan and Gregory, Howard, and Lappin, Shalom (2006). SHARDS: Fragment resolution in dialogue. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds.), Computing Meaning, Volume 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
100. Fernández, Raquel and Ginzburg, Jonathan and Lappin, Shalom (2004). Classifying ellipsis in dialogue: a machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Geneva.
101. Fernández, Raquel and Ginzburg, Jonathan and Lappin, Shalom (2007) Classifying ellipsis in dialogue: a machine learning approach.. Computational Linguistics, 33(3), 397-427.
102. Fernando, Tim (2001). Conservative generalized quantifiers and presupposition. In Rachel Hastings et al., eds., Proceedings of the 11th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 11), New York University, 172-91.
103. Fernando, Tim (2007a) Observing events and situations in time.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(5), 527-50.
104. Fernando, Tim (2007b). Situations from events to proofs. In K. Korta and J. Garmendia (eds.), Meaning, Intentions, and Argumentation. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
105. Fillmore, C.J. (1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding.. Quaderni di semantica, 6(2), 222-54.
106. Fillmore, C.J. (1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J. P. Koenig, and A. Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 113-28.
107. FIPA (2003). The foundation for intelligent physical agents: interaction protocol specifications. Available at #http://www.fipa.org#.
108. Fletcher, Charles (1994). Levels of representation in memory for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Academic Press.
109. Fox, Chris and Lappin, Shalom (2009). Expressiveness and complexity in underspecified semantics. In N. Dershowitz and E. Nissan (eds.), Language, Culture, Computation: Studies in Honor of Yaacov Choueka, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
110. Frampton, Matthew, Fernández, Raquel, Ehlen, Patrick, Christoudias, Mario, Darrell, Trevor, and Peters, Stanley (2009). Who is you? Combining linguistic and gaze features to resolve second-person references in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Athens, Greece.
111. Galati, Alexia and Brennan, Susan (2006). Given-new attenuation effects in spoken discourse: for the speaker, or for the addressee? In Abstracts of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Texas: Houston, 15.
112. Gardent, Claire, Kohlhase, Michael, and van Leusen, Noor (1996). Corrections and higherorder unification. In Proceedings of Konvens, 268-79.
113. Garrod, Simon and Pickering, Martin (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-90.
114. Garside, Roger (1987). The Claws word-tagging system. In R. Garside, G. Leech, and G. Sampson (eds.), The Computational Analysis of English: a Corpus-Based Approach. Harlow:, 30-41.
115. Gawron, Mark and Peters, Stanley (1990). Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics. CSLI Lecture Notes. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
116. Georgeff, M. P. and Lansky, Amy L. (1987). Reactive reasoning and planning. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), Seattle, WA, 677-82.
117. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1992). Questions, Queries, and Facts: a Semantic and Pragmatics for Interrogatives. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
118. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1994). An update semantics for dialogue. In H. Blunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computational Semantics. ITK, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
119. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1995) Resolving questions, I.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 459-527.
120. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1996). Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In J. Seligman and D. Westerstâhl (eds.) Logic, Language, and Computation. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 221-37.
121. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1997). On some semantic consequences of turn taking. In P. Dekker, M. Stokhof, and Y. Venema (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium on Formal Semantics and Logic. Amsterdam: ILLC, 145-50.
122. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1999a). Describing conversational interaction: some implications for HPSG. Talk presented at the 6th International Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Conference. Edinburgh.
123. Ginzburg, Jonathan (1999b). Ellipsis resolution with syntactic presuppositions. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds.), Computing Meaning: Current Issues in Computational Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
124. Ginzburg, Jonathan (2003). Disentangling public from private meaning. In J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (eds.), Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 183-212.
125. Ginzburg, Jonathan (2005) Abstraction and ontology: questions as propositional abstracts in constructivetype theory.. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(2), 113-30.
126. Ginzburg, Jonathan (2010). Questions: logic and interaction. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: North Holland.
127. Ginzburg, Jonathan (2011). Situation semantics and the ontology of natural language. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maierborn, and P. Portner (eds.), The Handbook of Semantics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
128. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Cooper, Robin (2001). Resolving ellipsis in clarification. In Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, 236-43.
129. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Cooper, Robin (2004) Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(3), 297-366.
130. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Fernández, Raquel (2005a). Action at a distance: the difference between dialogue and multilogue. In C. Gardent (ed.), Proceedings of Dialor, the 9th Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Nancy: LORIA.
131. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Fernández, Raquel (2005b). Scaling up to multilogue: some benchmarks and principles. In Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Michigan, 231-8.
132. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Fernández, Raquel and Schlangen, David (2007). Unifying selfand other-repair. In M. Poesio (ed.), Proceedings of Decalog, the 11th Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Rovereto: University of Trento.
133. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Fernández, Raquel and Schlangen, David (2011). Disfluencies as intra-utterance dialogue moves. Unpublished Ms.
134. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Kolliakou, Dimitra (2009) Answers without questions: the emergence of fragments in child language.. Journal of Linguistics, 45, 641-73.
135. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Kolliakou, Dimitra (2010). Avoiding repetition? A puzzle in the emergence of elliptical clarification requests. Presented at RALFe (Rencontres d'Autumne de Linguistique Formelle), Université Paris 8.
136. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Macura, Zoran (2006). Lexical acquisition with and without metacommunication. In C. Lyon (ed.), The Emergence of Communication and Language. Heidelberg: Springer, 287-301.
137. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Purver, Matthew (2008). Quantification, the reprise content hypothesis, and type theory. In L. Borin and S. Larsson (eds.), From Quantification to Conversation. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
138. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Sag, Ivan A. (1999). Constructional ambiguity in conversation. In P. Dekker (ed.), Proceedings of the 12th Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: ILLC.
139. Ginzburg, Jonathan and Sag, Ivan A. 2000). Interrogative Investigations: the Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. CSLI Lecture Notes, 123. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
140. Godfrey, John J., Holliman, Edward C., and McDaniel, Jane (1992). Switchboard: Telephone speech corpus for research and devlopment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, San Francisco, 517-20.
141. Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
142. Goldberg, Adele (1995). A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
143. Green, Georgia (2000). Modelling grammar growth: universal grammar without innate principles or parameters. Revised and expanded version of a paper presented at GALA 97, University of Edinburgh.
144. Greenfield, Patricia and Savage-Rumbaugh, Sue (1993) Comparing communicative competence in child and chimp: the pragmatics of repetition.. Journal of Child Language, 20, 1-26.
145. Gregory, Howard and Lappin, Shalom (1999). Antecedent contained ellipsis in HPSG. In G. Webelhuth, J. P. Koenig, and A. Kathol (eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 331-56.
146. Groenendijk, Jeroen (1998). Questions in update semantics. In J. Hulstijn and A. Nijholt (eds.), Proceedings of TwenDial 98, 13th Twente Workshop on Language Technology. Twente University, Twente, 125-37.
147. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1984). Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
148. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1991) Dynamic predicate logic.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14(1), 39-100.
149. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Stokhof, Martin (1997). Questions. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
150. Grosz, Barbara and Sidner, Candace (1986) Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse.. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175-204.
151. Gruenstein, Alexander (2002). English corrective fragments: syntactic and semantic considerations. Available at #http://www-Csli.stanford.edu/~alexgru/fragments.ps#.
152. Hamblin, Charles L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
153. Hauser, Marc (1995). The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
154. Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam, and Fitch, Tecumseh (2002). The language faculty: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569.
155. Hausser, Roland (1983). The syntax and semantics of English mood. In F. Kiefer (ed.), Questions and Answers. Dordrecht: Reidel.
156. Healey, Patrick (2008). Interactive misalignment: the role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In R. Cooper and R. Kempson (eds.), Language in Flux: Dialogue Coordination, Language Variation, Change and Evolution. London: College Publications.
157. Healey, Patrick and Purver, Matt, King, James, Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Mills, Greg (2003). Experimenting with clarification in dialogue. In R. Alterman and D. Kirsh (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 539-44.
158. Heeman, Peter A. and Allen, James F. (1999) Speech repairs, intonational phrases and discourse markers: modeling speakers' utterances in spoken dialogue.. Computational Linguistics, 25(4), 527-71.
159. Heim, Irene (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
160. Henry, Alison (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
161. Higginbotham, James (1983) The logic of perceptual reports: an extensional alternative to situation semantics.. Journal of Philosophy, 80(2), 100-27.
162. Higginbotham, James (1994). The semantics and syntax of event reference. Course Notes ESSLLI 4, Copenhagen Business School.
163. Hintikka, Jaakko (1976). The Semantics of Questions and the Questions of Semantics. Volume 28, Acta Philosophica Fennica. Amsterdam: North Holland.
164. Hoepelmann, Jacob (1983). On questions. In F. Kiefer (ed.), Questions and Answers. Dordrecht: Reidel.
165. Horne, Merle (2008). Attitude reports in spontaneous dialogue: uncertainty, politeness and filled pauses. In L. Borin and S. Larsson (eds.), From Quantification to Conversation. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University, 309-18.
166. Horton, William S. and Keysar, Boaz (1996) When do speakers take into account common ground?. Cognition, 59(1), 91-117.
167. Hull, Rodney (1975). A semantics for superficial and embedded questions in natural language. In E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Hull, Rodney (1996). Where monsters dwell. In J. Seligman and D. Westerstâhl (eds.), Logic, Language, and Computation. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 303-16.
169. Jasinskaja, Ekaterina (2006). Pragmatics and Prosody of Implicit Discourse Relations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tubingen.
170. Jefferson, Gail (1983) On exposed and embedded correction in conversation.. Studium Linguistik, 14, 58-68.
171. Johnson, David and Lappin, Shalom (1999). Local Constraints versus Economy. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
172. Kamp, Hans (1979). Events, instants and temporal reference. In Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
173. Kamp, Hans (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk (ed.), Formal Methods in Semantics. Amsterdam Centre for Mathematics.
174. Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 42. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
175. Kaplan, David (1989). Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press, 481-614. An earlier unpublished version exists asa UCLA MS from ca 1977.
176. Kaup, Barbara (2006) What psycholinguistic negation research tells us about the nature of the working memory representations utilized in language comprehension.. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 173, 313-50.
177. Keenan, Edward and Westerstâhl, Dag (1997). Generalized Quantifiers. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
178. Keenan, Janice, MacWhinney, Brian, and Mayhew Deborah (1977) Pragmatics in memory: a study of natural conversation.. Journal of Verbal Learning and Deborah Verbal Behavior, 16, 549-60.
179. Kehler, Andrew (1994). Common topics and coherent situations: interpreting ellipsis in the context of discourse inference. ACL, 32, 50-7.
180. Kempson, Ruth, Meyer-Viol, Wilfried, and Gabbay, Dov (2000). Dynamic Syntax: the Flow of Language Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
181. Kennedy, Graeme (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Language and Linguistics. London: Longman.
182. Kilgarriff, Adam (1998). BNC database and word frequency lists. Available at http://www.itri.bton.ac.uk/AAdam.Kilgarriff/bnc-readme.html.
183. King, Paul John (1989). A Logical Formalism for Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manchester.
184. King, Paul John (1996). An expanded logical formalism for Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Technical report, Working Papers of the SFB 340.
185. Kintsch, Walter and Bates, Elizabeth (1977) Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 150-9.
186. Krahmer, Emiel and Piwek, Paul (1999). Presupposition projection as proof construction. In H. Bunt and R. Muskens (eds.), Computing Meaning: Current Issues in Computational Semantics, Volume 1. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
187. Krifka, Manfred (2001). For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag 287-319.
188. Kronlid, Fredrik (2008). Steps towards Multi-Party Dialogue Management. Ph.D. dissertation, Gothenburg University.
189. Van Kuppevelt, Jan (1995) Discourse structure, topicality and questioning.. Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 109-47.
190. Van Kuppevelt, Jan (1996) Inferring from topics.. Linguistic and Philosophy, 19, 393-443.
191. Lahiri, Utpal (2002). Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
192. Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ Press.
193. Lappin, Shalom and Gregory, Howard (1997). A computational model of ellipsis resolution. In R. Oehrle (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Grammar. Aix en Provence: ESSLLI.
194. Larsson, Staffan (2002). Issue-based Dialogue Management. Ph.D. dissertation, Gothenburg University.
195. Larsson, Staffan and Traum, David (2003). The information state approach to dialogue management. In J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (eds.), Advances in Discourse and Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
196. Larsson, Staffan and Zaenen, Annie (2000). Document transformations and information states. In L. Dybkjaer, K. Hasida, and D. Traum (eds.), Proceeding of 1st SigDial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, ACL 2000. Hong Kong, 112-20.
197. Lascarides, Alex and Asher, Nicholas (2009). The interpretation of questions in dialogue. In A. Riester and T. Solstad (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, Volume 5, SinSpeC. Working Papers of the SFB 732, University of Stuttgart, 17-30.
198. Lasnik, Howard (2001). When can you save a structure by destroying it? In M. Kim and U. Strauss (eds.), Papers from the 31st Annual Meeting of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 301-20.
199. Lau, Ellen F. and Ferreira, Fernanda (2005) Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path sentences.. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 633-66.
200. Levelt, Willem J.M. (1983) Monitoring and self-repair in speech.. Cognition, 14(4), 41-104.
201. Levelt, Willem J.M. (1993). Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
202. Levin, Lori (1982). Sluicing: a lexical interpretation procedure. In J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
203. Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
204. Levinson, Stephen C.(2000). Presumptive Meanings: the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
205. Lewis, David (1968). Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
206. Lewis, David (1979). Score keeping in a language game. In R. Bauerle (ed.), Semantics from Different Points of View. 172-187. Springer.
207. Link, Godehard (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
208. Lonning, Jan Tore (1997). Plurals and collectivity. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
209. Lorenz, Konrad (1963). On Aggression. San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
210. Macura, Zoran (2007). Metacommunication and Lexical Acquisition in a Primitive Foraging Environment. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College, London.
211. Macura, Zoran and Ginzburg, Jonathan (2006). Lexicon convergence in a population with and without metacommunication. In P. Vogt (ed.), Proceedings of EELC 2006, Lecture Notes in AI, 4211. Heidelberg: Springer, 100-12.
212. Matheson, Colin, Poesio, Massimo, and Traum, David (2000). Modeling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the ACL, Seattle, April.
213. McKelvie, David (1998). The syntax of disfluency in spontaneous spoken language. HCRC Research Paper HCRC/RP-95, May, Human Communication Research Centre, Edinburgh.
214. Merchant, Jason (2002). The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
215. Merchant, Jason (2004) Fragments.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 661-738.
216. Michaelis, Laura A. (2009). Sign-based construction grammar. In B. Henne and H. Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
217. Milward, David (1994) Dynamic dependency grammar.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 17, 561-05.
218. Montague, Richard (1974a). Pragmatics. In R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
219. Montague, Richard (1974b). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
220. Montague, Richard (1974c). Universal grammar. In R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Reprinted from a paper that first appeared in 1970 in Theoria, 36: 373-98.
221. Moortgat, Michael (1997). Categorial grammar. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
222. Morgan, Jerry (1973). Sentence fragments and the notion 'sentence'. In B. Kachru (ed.), Issues in Linguistics: Papers in honour of Henry and Rene Kahane. New York: Oxford University Press.
223. Morgan, Jerry (1989). Sentence fragments revisited. In R. Chametzky (ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: CLS.
224. Morrill, Glyn (2000) Incremental processing and acceptability.. Computational Linguistics, 26(3), 319-38.
225. Morris, Charles W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. International Encyclopaedia of Unifed Sciences, Vol. I, no. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
226. Muskens, Reinhard (1996) Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19(2), 143-86.
227. Muskens, Reinhard (2001). Categorial grammar and lexical-functional grammar. In Proceedings of the LFGO1 Conference, University of Hong Kong, 259-79.
228. Nakano, Yukiko, Reinstein, Gabe, Stocky, Tom, and Cassell, Justine (2003). Towards a model of face-to-face grounding. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, 553-61.
229. Ninio, Anat and Snow, Catherine (1996). Pragmatic Development. Boulder, CO: Westview.
230. Nofsinger, Robert (1991). Everyday Conversation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
231. Partee, Barbara (1985) Situations, worlds, and contexts.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 53-8.
232. Penn, Gerald (2000). The Algebraic Structure of Attributed Type Signatures. Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
233. Perry, John (1977). Frege on demonstratives. In J. Perry (ed.), The Essential Indexical. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Originally published in 1977 in the Philosophical Review.
234. Peterson, Philip (1997). Fact, Proposition, Event. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
235. Pinker, Steven and Bloom, P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection.. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707-84.
236. Pinker, Steven and Jackendoff, Ray (2005) The faculty of language: what's special about it?. Cognition, 95(2), 201-36.
237. Poesio, Massimo (1993). A situation-theoretic formalization of definite description interpretation in plan elaboration dialogues. In P. Aczel, D. Israel, Y. Katagiri, and S. Peters (eds.), Situation Theory and Its Applications, III, CSLI Lecture Notes Number 37. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
238. Poesio, Massimo (1997). Underspecified interpretations and a theory of language processing. University of Edinburgh: Centre for Cognitive Studies.
239. Poesio, Massimo and Rieser, Hannes (2010) (Prolegomena to a theory of) completions, continuations, and coordination in dialogue.. Dialogue and Discourse, 1, 1-89.
240. Poesio, Massimo and Traum, David (1997) Conversational actions and discourse situations.. Computational Intelligence, 13, 309-47.
241. Poesio, Massimo and Traum, David (1998). Towards an axiomatization of dialogue acts. In J. Hulstijn and A. Nijholt (eds.), Proceedings of TwenDial 98, 13th Twente Workshop on Language Technology, Twente University, Twente, 207-21.
242. Polanyi, Livia (1987) A formal model of the structure of discourse.. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(1), 601-38.
243. Pollard, Carl (1997). Lectures on the Foundations of HPSG. Unpublished MS Ohio State University; available from #http://www-csli.stanford.edu/Asag/L221a/cp-lec-notes.pdf#.
244. Poesio, Massimo and Traum, David (2004). Higher order grammar. Lecture notes for the NASSLLI 2004 Summer School.
245. Poesio, Massimo and Sag, Ivan A. (1987). Information-Based Syntax and Semantics. Stanford: CSLI.
246. Poesio, Massimo and Sag, Ivan A.(1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and CSLI.
247. Portner, Paul (1997) The semantics of mood, complementation, and conversational force.. Natural Language Semantics, 5(2), 167-212.
248. Portner, Paul (2004). The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In K. Watanabe and R. B. Young (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 14. Ithaca: Cornell University, CLC Publication, 235-52.
249. Postal, Paul M. (1993) Remarks on weak crossover.. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 539-56.
250. Prakken, Henry (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.. Argument and Computation, 1(2), 93-124.
251. Prévot, Laurent (2003). Structures sémantiques et pragmatiques pour la modélisation de la cohérence dans des dialogues finalisés. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse.
252. Pulman, Stephen G. (1997) Higher order unification and the interpretation of focus.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20(1), 73-115.
253. Purver, Matthew (2001). Score: a tool for searching the BNC. Technical Report TR-01-07, King's College, London.
254. Purver, Matthew (2004). The Theory and Use of Clarification in Dialogue. Ph.D. dissertation, King's College, London.
255. Purver, Matthew (2006) Clarie: Handling clarification requests in a dialogue system.. Research on Language and Computation, 4(2), 259-88.
256. Purver, Matthew and Ginzburg, Jonathan (2004) Clarifying noun phrase semantics.. Journal of Semantics, 21(3), 283-339.
257. Purver, Matthew and Ginzburg, Jonathan and Healey, Patrick (2001). On the means for clarification in dialogue. In J. van Kuppevelt and R. Smith (eds.), Current and New Directions in Discourse and Dialogue. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 235-56.
258. Purver, Matthew and Ginzburg, Jonathan and Healey, Patrick (2006). Lexical categories and clarificational potential. Unpublished MS, Queen Mary College, University of London.
259. Purver, Matthew Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Meyer-Viol, Wilfried, and Cann, Ronnie (2010). Splitting the 'i's and crossing the 'you's: Context, speech acts and grammar. In P. Lupkowski and M. Purver (eds.), Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Polish Society for Cognitive Science, Poznañ, 43-50.
260. Purver, Matthew Healey, Patrick G. T., King, James, Ginzburg, Jonathan, and Mills, Greg J. (2003). Answering clarification questions. In Proceedings of the 4th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sapporo. ACL.
261. Ranta, Aarne (1994). Type Theoretical Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
262. Recanati, François (2001) What is said.. Synthese, 128(1), 75-91.
263. Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Coreference and bound anaphora.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 47-88.
264. Reinhart, Tanya (1997) Quantifier scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 335-97.
265. Richard, Mark (1993) Attitudes in context.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(2), 123-48.
266. Riesser, Verena and Moore, Joanna (2005). Implications for generating clarification requests in task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL, Ann Arbor, June. ACL, 239-46.
267. Roberts, Craige (1996). Information structure in discourse: towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J.-H. Yoon and A. Kathol (eds), Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 49: Papers in Semantics, 91-136.
268. Rodriguez, Kepa and Schlangen, David (2004). Form, intonation and function of clarification requests in German task-oriented spoken dialogues. In J. Ginzburg and E. Vallduví (eds.), Proceedings of Catalog'04, The 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
269. Rooth, Mats (1993) A theory of focus interpretation.. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
270. Van Rooy, Robert (2003) Asking to solve decision Problems.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(6), 727-63.
271. Ross, John (1969). Guess who. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: CLS. 252-86.
272. Rowland, Caroline, Pine, Julian, Lieven, Elena, and Teakston, Anna (2003).Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech. Journal of Child Language, 30, 609-35.
273. Rudnicky, Alex (2004). Learning to talk by listening. Talk presented at Catalog'04, the 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, July 2004.
274. Sachs, Jacqueline (1967) Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse.. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 437-42.
275. Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Jefferson, Gail (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
276. Sadock, J.M. (1974). Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
277. Sag, Ivan A. and Nykiel, Joanna (2011). We can't hear the strikethroughs, either: sluicing without deletion. Handout of talk presented at May 2011 Stanford Workshop on Ellipsis.
278. Sag, Ivan A. and Wasow, Tomas (1999). Syntactic Theory: a Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI.
279. Sag, Ivan A. and Wasow, Tomas and Bender, Emily (2003). Syntactic Theory: a Formal Introduction, 2nd edition. Stanford: CSLI.
280. Saxton, Matthew, Houston-Price, Carmel, and Dawson, Natasha (2005) Te prompt hypothesis: clarification requests as corrective input for grammatical errors.. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 393-414.
281. Scha, Remko (1983). Logical Foundations for Question Answering. Ph.D. dissertation, Rijksuniversitet Groningen.
282. Scheflen, Albert E. (1961). A psychotherapy of schizophrenia: direct analysis. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 133(4), 362.
283. Schegloff, Emanuel (1987a). Between macro and micro: contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, and N. Smelser (eds.), The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley: University of California Press, 207-34.
284. Schegloff, Emanuel (1987b) Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction.. Linguistics, 25, 201-18.
285. Schegloff, Emanuel (1992) Repair after the next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation.. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-345.
286. Schegloff, Emanuel (2000) When others initiate repair.. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205-43.
287. Schegloff, Emanuel (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
288. Schegloff, Emanuel, Jefferson, Gail, and Sacks, Harvey (1977) Te preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.. Language, 53, 361-82.
289. Schlangen, David (2003). A Coherence-Based Approach to the Interpretation of Non-Sentential Utterances in Dialogue. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
290. Schlangen, David (2004). Causes and strategies for requesting clarification in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 5th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Cambridge, Mass.: ACL, 136-43.
291. Schlangen, David (2005). Towards finding and fixing fragments: using machine learning to identify nonsentential utterances and their antecedents in multiparty dialogue. In Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, June.
292. Searle, John (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
293. Seligman, Jerry and Moss, Larry (1997). Situation theory. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
294. Shriberg, Elizabeth E. (1994). Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfiuencies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
295. Sinclair, John M. and Coulthard, Malcolm (1975). Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
296. Soames, Scott (1985) Lost innocence.. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 59-71.
297. Speas, Peggy and Tenny, Carol (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles, in Asymmetry in Grammar. Volume I: Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 315-44.
298. Sperber, Dan and Wilson, Deidre (1986). Relevance, 2nd edition (1995). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
299. Stainton, Robert (2006). Words and Thoughts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
300. Stalnaker, Robert C. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9. New York: Academic Press, 315-32.
301. Von Stechow, Arnim (1991). Focusing and backgrounding operators. In W. Abraham (ed.), Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 37-84.
302. Steedman, Mark (1996). Surface Structure and Interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
303. Steedman, Mark (1999a). Alternating quantifier scope in CCG. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Maryland, 301-568.
304. Steedman, Mark (1999b). The Syntactic Process. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
305. Stephany, Ursula (1995). Te acquisition of Greek. In D.I. Slobin (ed.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
306. Stone, Matthew (2008). Layered pragmatic processes: the case of metaphorical instructions. Talk given at Dialogue Matters final workshop, King's College, London.
307. Sundholm, Göran (1986). Proof theory and meaning. In D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
308. Svartvik, Jan and Quirk, Randolph (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
309. Taglicht, Joseph (1984). Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longmans.
310. Teakston, Anna, Lieven, Elena, Pine, Julian, and Rowland, Caroline (2001) Te role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure.. Journal of Child Language, 28, 127-52.
311. Tian, Ye, Breheny, Richard, and Ferguson, Heather (2010) Why we simulate negated information: a dynamic pragmatic account.. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(12), 2305-12.
312. Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: a Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
313. Traum, David (1994). A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
314. Traum, David (1999). Computational models of grounding in collaborative systems. In Working Notes of AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication, 124-31.
315. Traum, David and Rickel, Jeff (2002). Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual world. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), 766-73.
316. Ubersfeld, Anne (1999). Reading Theatre. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
317. De Waijer, Joost Van (2001). 'Te importance of single-word utterances for early word recognition. In Proceedings of ELA 2001, Lyon.
318. Walton, Douglas, Reed, Christopher, and Macagno, Fabrizio (2010). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
319. Webber, Bonnie (1991) Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis.. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 107-35.
320. Wilson, John and Henry, Alison (1998) Parameter setting within a socially realistic linguistics.. Language in Society, 27(1), 1-21.
321. Winter, Yoad (1999). Plural type quantification. In Proceedings of the 12th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam.
322. Wiśniewski, Andrzej (2001) Questions and inferences.. Logique et Analyse, 173, 5-43.
323. Wiśniewski, Andrzej (2003) Erotetic search scenarios.. Synthese, 134, 389-427.
324. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.