Computational Models of Grounding in Collaborative Systems

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-03, Issue , 1999, Pages 124-131

  Traum, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; CONTRIBUTION MODEL;

EID: 85169917108     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Allwood, J.; Nivre, J.; and Ahlsen, E. 1992. On the semantics and pragmatics of linguistic feedback. Journal of Semantics 9.
2. Allwood, J. 1976. Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Göteborg University, Department of Linguistics.
3. Allwood, J. 1995. An activity based approach to pragmatics. Technical Report (GPTL) 75, Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, University of Göteborg.
4. Brennan, S. 1990. Seeking and Providing Evidence for Mutual Understanding. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
5. Cahn, J. E., and Brennan, S. E. 1999. A psychological model of grounding and repair in dialog. In Working Notes AAAI Fall Symposium on Psycholiogical Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems.
6. Clark, H. H., and Brennan, S. E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Resnick, L. B.; Levine, J.; and Teasley, S. D., eds., Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. APA.
7. Clark, H. H., and Marshall, C. R. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, A. K.; Webber, B. L.; and Sag, I. A., eds., Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge University Press. Also appears as Chapter 1 in (Clark 1992).
8. Clark, H. H., and Schaefer, E. F. 1989. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13:259-294. Also appears as Chapter 5 in (Clark 1992).
9. Clark, H. H. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. University of Chicago Press.
10. Cohen, P. R., and Levesque, H. J. 1991a. Confirmations and joint action. In Proceedings IJCAI-91, 951-957.
11. Cohen, P. R., and Levesque, H. J. 1991b. Teamwork. Nous 35.
12. Curtis, P. 1993. LambdaMOO programmer's manual. Xerox Parc.
13. Dillenbourg, P.; Jermann, P.; Schneider, D.; Traum, D.; and Buiu, C. 1997. The design of moo agents: Implications from a study on multi-modal collaborative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AI-ED 97), 15-22.
14. Dillenbourg, P.; Traum, D.; and Schneider, D. 1996. Grounding in multi-modal task-oriented collaboration. In Proceedings of the European Conference on AI in Education.
15. Discourse Resource Initiative. 1997. Standards for dialogue coding in natural language processing. Report no. 167, Dagstuhl-Seminar.
16. Grice, J. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J. L., eds., Syntax and Semantics, volume 3: Speech Acts. Academic Press. 41-58.
17. Grosz, B. J., and Kraus, S. 1993. Collaborative plans for group activities. In Proceedings IJCAI-93, 367-373. Grosz, B. J., and Sidner, C. L. 1990. Plans for discourse. In Cohen, P. R.; Morgan, J.; and Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. MIT Press.
18. Halpern, J. Y., and Moses, Y. 1990. Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. Journal of the ACM 37(3):549-587.
19. Hobbs, J. 1985. Ontological promiscuity. In Proceedings ACL-85, 61-69.
20. Nakatani, C. H., and Traum, D. R. 1999. Coding discourse structure in dialogue (version 1.0). Technical Report UMIACS-TR-99-03, University of Maryland.
21. Novick, D. G.; Walton, L.; and Ward, K. 1996. Contribution graphs in multiparty conversations. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue (ISSD-96), 53-56.
22. Pierrehumbert, J., and Hirschberg, J. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, P. R.; Morgan, J.; and Pollack, M. E., eds., Intentions in Communication. MIT Press.
23. Poesio, M., and Traum, D. R. 1997. Conversational actions and discourse situations. ComputationalIntelligence 13(3).
24. Roschelle, J., and Teasley, S. 1995. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'Malley, C., ed., Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Springer-Verlag.
25. Schegloff, E. A.; Jefferson, G.; and Sacks, H. 1977. The preference for self correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:361-382.
26. Smith, R. W., and Hipp, D. R. 1994. Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems: A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press.
27. Traum, D. R., and Allen, J. F. 1992. A speech acts approach to grounding in conversation. In Proceedings 2nd InternationalConferenceonSpokenLanguageProcessing (ICSLP-92), 137-40.
28. Traum, D. R., and Dillenbourg, P. 1996. Miscommunication in multi-modal collaboration. In Proceedings of the AAAI-96 Workshop on Detecting, Repairing, and Preventing Human-Machine Miscommunication.
29. Traum, D. R., and Dillenbourg, P. 1998. Towards a normative model of grounding in collaboration. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI98 workshop on Mutual Knowledge, Common Ground and Public Information.
30. Traum, D. R., and Heeman, P. 1997. Utterance units in spoken dialogue. In Maier, E.; Mast, M.; and Luperfoy, S., eds., Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems - ECAI-96 Workshop, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg. 125-140.
31. Traum, D. R., and Hinkelman, E. A. 1992. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Computational Intelligence 8(3):575-599. Special Issue on Non-literal language.
32. 131 Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester. Also available as TR 545, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
33. Walker, M. A. 1993. Informational Redundancy and Resource Bounds in Dialogue. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
34. Zollo, T., and Core, M. 1999. Automatically extracting grounding tags from bf tags. In Proceedings of the ACL-99 workshop Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, 109-114. Association for Computational Linguistics.