Scaling up from dialogue to multilogue: Some principles and benchmarks

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 231-238

  Ginzburg, Jonathan ^a   Fernández, Raquel ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRITISH NATIONAL CORPORA; DIALOGUE MANAGEMENT; DIALOGUE PROTOCOLS; DISTANCE RESOLUTION; SCALE-UP; SCALING-UP;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 69349098189     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Special issue on best practice in spoken language dialogue systems engineering. 2003. Natural Language Engineering.
2. Herbert Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Robin Cooper. 2004. A type theoretic approach to information state update in issue based dialogue management. Invited paper, Catalog'04, the 8th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona.
4. James Dabbs and R. Barry Ruback. 1987 Dimensions of group process: amount and structure of vocal interaction. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20, pages 123-169.
5. Frank P.M. Dignum and Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk. 2003. Towards a testbed for multi-party dialogues. In Proceedings of the first International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2003).
6. Nicholas Fay, Simon Garrod, and Jean Carletta. 2000. Group discussion as interactive dialogue or serial monologue. Psychological Science, pages 481-486.
7. Raquel Fernández and Jonathan Ginzburg. 2002. Nonsentential utterances: A corpus study. Traitement automatique des languages. Dialogue, 43(2):13-42.
8. FIPA. 2003. The foundation for intelligent physical agents. interaction protocol specifications.http://www.fipa.org.
9. Roger Garside. 1987. The CLAWS word-tagging system, In Roger Garside et al. editors, The computational analysis of English: a corpus-based approach, Longman, Harlow, pages 30-41.
10. Jonathan Ginzburg and Robin Cooper. 2001. Resolving ellipsis in clarification. In Proceedings of the 39th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse.
11. Jonathan Ginzburg and Ivan A. Sag. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: the form, meaning and use of English Interrogatives. Number 123 in CSLI Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford: California.
12. Jonathan Ginzburg. (forthcoming). Semantics and Interaction in Dialogue CSLI Publications and University of Chicago Press.
13. Jonathan Ginzburg. 1996. Interrogatives: Questions, facts, and dialogue. In Shalom Lappin, editor, Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Blackwell, Oxford.
14. Erving Goffman 1981 Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
15. Staffan Larsson. 2002. Issue based Dialogue Management. Ph.D. thesis, Gothenburg University.
16. Colin Matheson and Massimo Poesio and David Traum.2000. Modelling Grounding and Discourse Obligations Using Update Rules. Proceedings of NAACL 2000, Seattle.
17. Stephen Pulman. 1997. Focus and higher order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20.
18. Matthew Purver. 2004. The Theory and Use of Clarification in Dialogue. Ph.D. thesis, King's College, London.
19. David Traum and Jeff Rickel. 2002. Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual world. In Proceedings of the first International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pages 766-773. (Pubitemid 34975262)
20. David Traum. 2003. Semantics and pragmatics of questions and answers for dialogue agents. In H. Bunt, editor, Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, pages 380-394, Tilburg. ITK, Tilburg University.