Status of robotic assistance - A less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery?

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Volumn 397, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 333-341

  Kenngott, H G ^a   Fischer, L ^a   Nickel, F ^a   Rom, J ^a   Rassweiler, J ^a   Muller Stich B P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

History of medical robotics; Robotic assistance; Robotic visceral surgery; Status of robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT INDICATION;

FUNDOPLICATION; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 84859849230     PISSN: 14352443     EISSN: 14352451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0859-7     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Assalia A, Gagner M (2004) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Br J Surg 91(10):1259-1274. doi:10.1002/bjs.4738 (Pubitemid 39331450)
2. Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL, Grassi GB (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239(3):325-337 (Pubitemid 38229061)
3. Sauerland S, Angrisani L, Belachew M, Chevallier JM, Favretti F, Finer N, Fingerhut A, Garcia Caballero M, Guisado Macias JA, Mittermair R, Morino M, Msika S, Rubino F, Tacchino R, Weiner R, Neugebauer EA (2005) Obesity surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 19(2):200-221. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-9194-1 (Pubitemid 40691215)
4. Gupta PK, Natarajan B, Pallati PK, Gupta H, Sainath J, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (2011) Outcomes after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 25(3):784-794. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1256-y
5. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD006231. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006231
6. Frede T, Stock C, Renner C, Budair Z, Abdel-Salam Y, Rassweiler J (1999) Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques. J Endourol 13(3):191-198 (Pubitemid 29267620)
7. Kenngott HG, Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Rassweiler J, Gutt CN (2008) Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17 (3):160-167. doi:10.1080/13645700802103381
8. Moravec H.-P. (2011) Robot. Encyclopaedia Britannica Online, Web edn. Encyclopaedia Britannica
9. World Robotics 2010 Service Robots - statistics, market analysis, forecasts and case studies (2010). International Federation of Robotics Statistical Department, Frankfurt
10. Hanly EJ, Talamini MA (2004) Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188(4A Suppl):19S-26S. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.020
11. Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 35(2):153-160. doi:10.1109/10.1354 (Pubitemid 18079553)
12. Reynolds W Jr (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5(1):89-94
13. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, Hibberd RD, Davies BL, Wickham JE, Nathan MS, Kundu B (1997) The Probot - an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 211(4):317-325 (Pubitemid 127797242)
14. Mantwill F, Schulz AP, Faber A, Hollstein D, Kammal M, Fay A, Jurgens C (2005) Robotic systems in total hip arthroplasty - is the time ripe for a new approach? Int J Med Robot 1(4):8-19. doi:10.1002/rcs.55
15. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M, Butner SE, Smith MK (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413(6854):379-380. doi:10.1038/3509663635096636 (Pubitemid 32928582)
16. Rassweiler J, Safi KC, Subotic S, Teber D, Frede T (2005) Robotics and telesurgery - an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(2):109-122. doi:10.1080/13645700510010908 (Pubitemid 40637442)
17. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12(1):80-90 (Pubitemid 40614258)
18. Breedveld P, Stassen HG, Meijer DW, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Observation in laparoscopic surgery: overview of impeding effects and supporting aids. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10(5):231-241
19. Harrell AG, Heniford BT (2005) Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future. Am J Surg 190 (2):239-243. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.019 (Pubitemid 40967933)
20. Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15(10):1204-1207. doi:10.1007/s004640080030 (Pubitemid 32929181)
21. Reza M, Maeso S, Blasco JA, Andradas E (2010) Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery. Br J Surg 97(12):1772-1783. doi:10.1002/bjs.7269
22. Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O (2009) Robotic vs. open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 104(7):991-995. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x
23. Lee G, Sutton E, Clanton T, Park A (2011) Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment. Surg Endosc 25(5):1585-1593. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1443-x
24. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadiere GB, Nyssen AS (2007) Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 194(1):115-121. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.014 (Pubitemid 46876727)
25. Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M (2005) Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J Endourol 19(10):1212-1215. doi:10.1089/end.2005.19. 1212 (Pubitemid 43082918)
26. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, Conrad J, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2007) Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am J Surg 193(4):519-522. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042 (Pubitemid 46412256)
27. Marecik SJ, Chaudhry V, Jan A, Pearl RK, Park JJ, Prasad LM (2007) A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and hand-sewn intestinal sutured anastomoses performed by residents. Am J Surg 193(3):349-355. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.018, discussion 355
28. Knight CG, Lorincz A, Cao A, Gidell K, Klein MD, Langenburg SE (2005) Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15(2):182-185. doi:10.1089/lap.2005.15.182 (Pubitemid 40677284)
29. Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W (2003) A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 17(10):1595-1599. doi:10.1007/s00464- 002-9248-1 (Pubitemid 37467626)
30. Garcia-Ruiz A, Smedira NG, Loop FD, Hahn JF, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Gagner M (1997) Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 7(5):277-283 (Pubitemid 28078143)
31. Lee EC, Rafiq A, Merrell R, Ackerman R, Dennerlein JT (2005) Ergonomics and human factors in endoscopic surgery: a comparison of manual vs telerobotic simulation systems. Surg Endosc 19 (8):1064-1070. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-8213-6 (Pubitemid 41494823)
32. Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87(4):408-410. doi:bju115[pii]
33. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW (2004) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 63(5):819-822. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.038 (Pubitemid 38596655)
34. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2002) Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 60(5):864-868 (Pubitemid 35300356)
35. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W (2009) A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 104(4):534-539. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08419.x
36. Van Velthoven R RE, Abbou CC, Rassweiler J, Lee D, Mottrie A, Gill IS, Erdogru T, Menon M, Sharecky D, Ahlering T (2007) Single knot anastomosis (SKA) for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multi-center outcome survey of 5235 cases. J Endourol 22:Suppl.; A54 (abstract No. MP08-59)
37. Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G (2006) Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 24(2):171-179. doi:10.1007/s00345-006-0065-3 (Pubitemid 43842547)
38. Annual report 2010 (2011) Intuitive Surgical Inc.
39. Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):60-63. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.001 (Pubitemid 43129735)
40. Advincula AP, Xu X, St G, Ransom SB (2007) Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(6):698-705. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008 (Pubitemid 350008145)
41. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK (2006) Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol 176(2):655-659. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.040 (Pubitemid 43927873)
42. Muller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, Bintintan VV, Koninger J, Buchler MW, Gutt CN (2007) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 21(10):1800-1805. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9268-y (Pubitemid 47404117)
43. Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22(7):1601-1608. doi:10.1007/s00464- 008-9752-z
44. Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W (2008) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc 22(7):1690-1696. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9698-6
45. Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12(11):1084-1093. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01999.x
46. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR (2006) A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 243(4):486-491. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000205626.71982.32
47. Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques. J Urol 172(4 Pt 1):1431-1435 (Pubitemid 39249737)
48. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 57 (3):453-458. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.008
49. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, Garrone C, Rebecchi F (2006) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 93(5):553-558. doi:10.1002/bjs.5325