From perception to conception: How meaningful objects are processed over time

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 187-197

  Clarke, Alex ^a   Taylor, Kirsten I ^a,b   Devereux, Barry ^a   Randall, Billi ^a   Tyler, Lorraine K ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

feature based statistics; magnetoencephalography; multiple regression; object recognition; semantic knowledge

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL CORTEX;

ADULT; AGING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 84870848814     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs002     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Badre D, Wagner AD. 2002. Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 1:206-218.
2. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, Dale AM, Hamalainen MS, Marinkovic K, Schacter DL, Rosen BR, et al. 2006. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:449-454.
3. Barense MD, Gaffan D, Graham K. 2007. The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects. Neuropsychologia. 45:2963-2974.
4. Bullier J. 2001. Integrated model of visual processing. Brain Res Rev. 36:96-107.
5. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. 2005. The perceptual-mnemonic/feature conjunction model of perirhinal cortex function. Q J Exp Psychol B. 58:269-282.
6. Chang K, Mitchell T, Just MA. 2011. Quantitative modeling of the neural representation of objects: how semantic feature norms can account for fMRI activation. Neuroimage. 56:716-727.
7. Clarke A, Taylor KI, Tyler LK. 2011. The evolution of meaning: spatiotemporal dynamics of visual object recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 23:1887-1899.
8. Cree GS, McNorgan C, McRae K. 2006. Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: implications for theories of semantic memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 32:643-658.
9. Cree GS, McRae K. 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). J Exp Psychol Gen. 132:163-201.
10. Crouzet SM, Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ. 2010. Fast saccades toward faces: face detection in just 100 ms. J Vis. 10(4):1-17.
11. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 9:179-194.
12. Dale AM, Sereno M. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J Cogn Neurosci. 5:162-176.
13. Dell'Acqua R, Sessa P, Peressotti F, Mulatti C, Navarrete E, Grainger J. 2010. ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Front Psychol. 1:177.
14. Dien J. 2009. A tale of two recognition systems: implications of the fusiform face area and the visual form area for lateralized object recognition models. Neuropsychologia. 47:1-16.
15. Dien J, Frishkoff GA, Cerbone A, Tucker DM. 2003. Parametric analysis of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension: evidence for parallel brain mechanisms. Cogn Brain Res. 15:137-153.
16. Fei-Fei L, Iyer A, Koch C, Perona P. 2007. What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene J Vis. 7:10.
17. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC. 1991. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1:1-47.
18. Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM. 1999. Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage. 9:195-207.
19. Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, Miller EK. 2001. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science. 291:312-316.
20. Friston K, Daunizeau J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Trujillo-Barreto N, Henson R, Flandin G, Mattout J. 2008. Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage. 39:1104-1120.
21. Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermuller F, Marslen-Wilson WD. 2006. The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage. 30:1383-1400.
22. Hauk O, Pulvermuller F, Ford M, Marslen-Wilson WD, Davis MH. 2009. Can I have a quick word? Early electrophysiological manifestations of psycholinguistic processes revealed by event-related regression analysis of the EEG. Biol Psychol. 80:64-74.
23. Haxby J, Gobbini M, Furey ML, Ishai A, Schouten JL, Pietrini P. 2001. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science. 293:2425-2430.
24. Hegdé J. 2008. Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Prog Neurobiol. 84:405-439.
25. Hochstein S, Ahissar M. 2002. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron. 36:791-804.
26. Humphreys GW, Forde EM. 2001. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behav Brain Sci. 24:453-476; discussion 476-509.
27. Kirchner H, Thorpe SJ. 2006. Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vis Res. 46:1762-1776.
28. Kriegeskorte N, Mur M, Ruff DA, Kiani R, Bodurka J, Esteky H, Tanaka K, Bandettini PA. 2008. Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey. Neuron. 60:1126-1141.
29. Lamme V, Roelfsema P. 2000. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci. 23:571-579.
30. Liu H, Agam Y, Madsen JR, Kreiman G. 2009. Timing, timing timing: fast decoding of object information from intracranial field potentials in human visual cortex. Neuron. 62:281-290.
31. Mace MJ-M, Joubert OR, Nespoulous J-L, Fabre-Thorpe M. 2009. The time-course of visual categorizations: you spot the animal faster than the bird. PLoS One. 4:e5927.
32. Marsolek CJ. 1999. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol Sci. 10:111-118.
33. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Muller MM. 2007. Induced gamma band responses predict recognition delays during object identification. J Cogn Neurosci. 19:921-934.
34. Martinovic J, Gruber T, Muller MM. 2008. Coding of visual object features and feature conjunctions in the human brain. PLoS One. 3:e3781.
35. Mattout J, Henson RN, Friston KJ. 2007. Canonical source reconstruction for MEG. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2007:1-10.
36. McRae K, Cree GS, Seidenberg MS, McNorgan C. 2005. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behav Res Methods. 37:547-559.
37. McRae K, de Sa VR, Seidenberg MS. 1997. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 126:99-130.
38. Mosher JC, Leahy RM, Lewis PS. 1999. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46:245-259.
39. Moss HE, Abdallah S, Fletcher P, Bright P, Pilgrim L, Acres K, Tyler LK. 2005. Selecting among competing alternatives: selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Cereb Cortex. 15:1723-1735.
40. Moss HE, Rodd JM, Stamatakis EA, Bright P, Tyler LK. 2005. Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. Cereb Cortex. 15:616-627.
41. Moss HE, Tyler LK, Taylor KI. 2007. Conceptual structure. In: Gaskell G, editor. Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 217-234.
42. Randall B, Moss HE, Rodd JM, Greer M, Tyler LK. 2004. Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 30:393-406.
43. Rousselet GA, Pernet CR, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB. 2008. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing. BMC Neurosci. 9
44. Schendan HE, Maher SM. 2009. Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms. Neuroimage. 44:1423-1438.
45. Scholte HS, Ghebreab S, Waldorp L, Smeulders AW, Lamme VA. 2009. Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. J Vis. 9(4):1-15.
46. Szé kely A, Bates E. 2000. Objective visual complexity as a variable in studies of picture naming. Center Res Lang Newslett. 12:1-33.
47. Tarkiainen A, Cornelissen PL, Salmelin R. 2002. Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letterstring perception. Brain. 125:1125-1136.
48. Taulu S, Simola J, Kojola M. 2005. Applications of the signal space separation method. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 53:3359-3372.
49. Taylor KI, Devereux BJ, Acres K, Randall B, Tyler LK. 2011. Conceptual structure predicts categorisation and identification of visual objects. Cognition. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.001.
50. Taylor KI, Devereux BJ, Tyler LK. 2011. Conceptual structure: towards an integrated neurocognitive account. Lang Cogn Process (Cogn Neurosci Lang). 26:1368-1401.
51. Taylor KI, Moss HE, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. 2006. Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:8239-8244.
52. Taylor KI, Moss HE, Tyler LK. 2007. The conceptual structure account: a cognitive model of semantic memory and its neural instantiation. In: Hart J, Kraut M, editors. The neural basis of semantic memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 265-301.
53. Taylor KI, Salamoura A, Randall B, Moss H, Tyler LK. 2008. Clarifying the nature of the distinctiveness by domain interaction in conceptual structure: comment on Cree, McNorgan, and McRae (2006). J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 34:719-725.
54. Thompson-Schill SL, D'Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ. 1997. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:14792-14797.
55. Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C. 1996. Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature. 381:520-522.
56. Tyler LK, Moss HE. 2001. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends Cogn Sci. 5:244-252.
57. Tyler LK, Stamatakis EA, Bright P, Acres K, Abdallah S, Rodd JM, Moss HE. 2004. Processing objects at different levels of specificity. J Cogn Neurosci. 16:351-362.
58. Ungerleider L, Mishkin M. 1982. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfiled RJW, editors. Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. p. 549-586.
59. VanRullen R, Thorpe SJ. 2001. The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making. J Cogn Neurosci. 13:454-461.
60. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2002. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci. 5:491-499.
61. Wagner AD, Pare-Blagoey EJ, Clark J, Poldrack RA. 2001. Recovering meaning: left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron. 31:329-338.