Conceptual structure: Towards an integrated neurocognitive account

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1368-1401

  Taylor, Kirsten I ^a,b   Devereux, Barry J ^a   Tyler, Lorraine K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conceptual; Objects

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DAMAGE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE ACCOUNT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PERCEPTION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84858020103     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.568227     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Allport, D. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia. (pp. 32-60). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone.
2. Almuhareb, A., & Poesio, M. (2005). Concept learning and categorization from the web. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stresa, Italy.
3. Baayen, R. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412.
5. Bar, M., Kassam, K. S., Ghuman, A. S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A. M., Dale, A. M., et al. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. PNAS, 103(2), 449-454.
6. Barense, M. D., Bussey, T. J., Lee, A. C. H., Rogers, T. T., Hodges, J. R., Saksida, L. M., et al. (2005). Feature ambiguity influences performance on novel object discriminations in patients with damage to perirhinal cortex. Cognitive Neuroscience Society*2005 Annual Meeting Program, 129.
7. Barense, M. D., Henson, R., Lee, A., & Graham, K. (2010). Medial temporal lobe activity during complex discrimination of faces, objects, and scenes: Effects of viewpoint. Hippocampus, 20, 389-401.
8. Baroni, M., Murphy, B., Barbu, E., & Poesio, M. (2009). Strudel: A corpus-based semantic model based on properties and types. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 222-254.
9. Barsalou, L. W (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
10. Barsalou, L. W, Simmons, W K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-92.
11. Barsalou, L. W., Solomon, K. O., & Wu, L. L. (1999). Perceptual simulation in conceptual tasks. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha, & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological, and psychological perspectives in cognitive linguistics: The proceedings of the 4th conference of the International Cognitive Linguistics Association (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Beauchamp, M. S., Argall, B. D., Bodurka, J., Duyn, J. H., & Martin, A. (2004). Unraveling multisensory integration: Patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7(11), 1190-1192.
13. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Argall, B. D., & Martin, A. (2004). Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41, 809-823.
14. Bussey, T. J., & Saksida, L. M. (2002). The organization of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 355-364.
15. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C, & Romani, C. (1990). The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161-189.
16. Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2006). The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 13-38.
17. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 1-34.
18. Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V, & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
19. Clarke, A., Taylor, K. I., & Tyler, L. K. (2010). The evolution of meaning: Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21544
20. Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C, & McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 643-658.
21. Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of Chipmunk, Cherry, Chisel, Cheese, and Cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(2), 163-201.
22. Cree, G S., McRae, K., & McNorgan, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23, 371-414.
23. Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.
24. Desimone, R., & Gross, C. (1979). Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Research, 178(2-3), 363-380.
25. Devereux, B., Pilkington, N., Poibeau, T, & Korhonen, A. (in press). Towards unrestricted, large-scale acquisition of feature-based conceptual representations from corpus data. Research on Language and Computation. doi: 10.1007/s11168-010-9068-8
26. th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), York, UK.
27. Devlin, J. T, Gonnerman, L. M., Andersen, E. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Category-specific semantic deficits in focal and widespread brain damage: A computational account. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 77-94.
28. Falchier, A., Clavagnier, S., Barone, P., & Kennedy, H. (2002). Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(13), 5749-5759.
29. Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1-47.
30. Forde, E. M. E., & Humphreys, G W (1999). Category-specific recognition impairments: A review of important case studies and influential theories. Aphasiology, 13, 169-193.
31. Gainotti, G, Silveri, M. C, Daniele, A., & Giustolisi, L. (1995). Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: A critical survey. Memory, 3, 247-264.
32. Goebel, R., Muckli, L., & Kim, D.-S. (2004). Visual system. In G Paxinos & J. K. Mai (Eds.), Human nervous system (2nd ed., pp. 1280-1335). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33. Greer, M., van Casteren, M., McClellan, S., Moss, H. E., Rodd, J., Rogers, T., et al. (2001). The emergence of semantic categories from distributed featural representations. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 358-363). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Hart, J., & Gordon, B. (1992). Neural subsystems for object knowledge. Nature, 359, 60-64.
35. Hart, J., & Kraut, M. A. (Eds.). (2007). Neural basis of semantic memory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Haxby, J. V, Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schuten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430.
37. Haxby, J. V, Ishai, A., Chao, L. L., Ungerleider, L. G, & Martin, A. (2000). Object-form topology in the ventral temporal lobe: Response to I. Gauthier (2000). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 3-4.
38. Higuchi, S., & Miyashita, Y (1996). Formation of mnemonic neuronal responses to visual paired associates in inferotemporal cortex is impaired by perirhinal and entorhinal lesions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93(2), 739-743.
39. Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081-2094.
40. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
41. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977). Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 198(1130), 1-59.
42. Humphreys, G W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "Category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 453-509.
43. Humphreys, G W., Price, C. J., & Riddoch, M. J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research, 62, 118-130.
44. Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G, Martin, A., Schouten, J., & Haxby, J. V. (1999). Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 9379-9384.
45. Iwamura, Y (1998). Hierarchical somatosensory processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 8, 522-528.
46. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition (Vol. VIII). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Kanwisher, N. (2003). The ventral visual object pathway in humans: Evidence from fMRI. In L. Chalupa & J. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences (pp. 1179-1189). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Keil, F (1986). The acquisition of natural kinds and artifact terms. In W Demoupoulous & A. Marras (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational issues (pp. 133-153).
50. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Kreiman, G, Koch, C, & Fried, I. (2000). Imagery neurons in the human brain. Nature, 408,357-361.
51. Laiacona, M., Barbarotto, R., & Capitani, E. (1993). Perceptual and associative knowledge in category specific impairment of semantic memory: A study of two cases. Cortex, 29, 727-740.
52. Lakatos, P., Chen, C.-M., O'Connell, M. N, Mills, A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2007). Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex. Neuron, 53(2), 279-292.
53. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Howard, D., Nightingale, G, & Ellis, A. W (1998). Are living and nonliving category-specific deficits causally linked to impaired perceptual or associative knowledge? Evidence from a category-specific double dissociation. Neurocase, 4, 311-338.
54. Lamme, V A. F, & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23(11), 571-579.
55. Lee, A. C, Bussey, T. J., Murray, E. A., Saksida, L. M., Epstein, R. A., Kapur, N., et al. (2005). Perceptual deficits in amnesia: Challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view. Neuropsychologia, 43(1), 1-11.
56. Macaluso, E. (2006). Multisensory processing in sensory-specific cortical areas. The Neuroscientist, 12, 327-338.
57. Mahon, B., Anzelotti, S., Schwarzbach, J., Zampini, M., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Category-specific organization in the human brain does not require visual experience. Neuron, 63(3), 397-405.
58. Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 102(1-3), 59-70.
59. Mahon, B., & Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 27-51.
60. Martin, A. (2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 24-45.
61. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 194-201.
62. Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000). Category-specificity and the brain: The sensory-motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1023-1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Masson, M. (1995). A distributed memory model of semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 3-23.
64. McRae, K., & Cree, G S. (2002). Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In E. M. E. Forde & G Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in mind and brain (pp. 211-250). Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
65. McRae, K., Cree, G S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 37, 547-559.
66. McRae, K., Cree, G S., Westmacott, R., & de Sa, V. R. (1999). Further evidence for feature correlations in semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(4), 360-373.
67. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(2), 99-130.
68. Mirman, D., & Magnuson, J. (2009). The effect of frequency of shared features on judgments of semantic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 671-677.
69. Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G, & Macko, K. A. (1983). Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways. Trends in Neurosciences, 6, 414-417.
70. Moss, H. E., Rodd, J. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2005). Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 616-627.
71. Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). A category-specific impairment for non-living things in a case of progressive aphasia. Brain and Language, 60(1), 55-58.
72. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Devlin, J. (2002). The emergence of category specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. In E. Forde & G W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category-specificity in brain and mind (pp. 115-148). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
73. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., Durrant-Peatfield, M., & Bunn, E. M. (1998). "Two eyes of a see-through": Impaired and intact semantic knowledge in a case of selective deficit for living things. Neurocase, 4, 291-310.
74. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Jennings, F. (1997). When leopards lose their spots: Knowledge of visual properties in category-specific deficits for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 901-950.
75. Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., & Taylor, K. I. (2007). Conceptual structure. In G Gaskell (Ed.), Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 217-234). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76. Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J. R., & Wise, R. J. (1996). Generating "tiger" as an animal name or a word beginning with T: Differences in brain activation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 263, 989-995.
77. Murray, E. A., & Bussey, T. J. (1999). Perceptual-mnemonic functions of the perirhinal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3, 142-151.
78. Murray, E. A., Bussey, T. J., & Saksida, L. M. (2007). Visual perception and memory: A new view of medial temporal lobe function in primates and rodents. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 99-122.
79. Murray, E. A., Malkova, L., & Goulet, S. (1998). Crossmodal associations, intramodal associations, and object identification in macaque monkeys. In A. D. Milner (Ed.), Comparative Neuropsychology (pp. 51-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
80. Murray, E. A., & Richmond, B. J. (2001). Role of perirhinal cortex in object perception, memory, and associations. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 188-193.
81. Naci, L., Pulvermuller, F., Taylor, K., Shtyrov, Y, Hauk, O., & Tyler, L. K. (2006). Spatiotemporal patterns of cross-modal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(Suppl.), E22.
82. O'Toole, A. J., Jiang, F., Abdi, H., & Haxby, J. V. (2005). Partially distributed representations of objects and faces in ventral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 580-590.
83. Parker, A., & Gaffan, D. (1998). Lesions of the primate rhinal cortex cause deficits in flavour-visual associative memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 93, 99-105.
84. Pexman, P. M., Holyk, G G, & Monfils, M. H. (2003). Number-of-features effects and semantic processing. Memory and Cognition, 31, 842-855.
85. Plaut, D. C, & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377-500.
86. Randall, B., Moss, H. E., Rodd, J. M., Greer, M., & Tyler, L. K. (2004). Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: Behavioral and computational studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 393-406.
87. Rauschecker, J. P., & Tian, B. (2000). Mechanisms and streams for processing of "what" and "where" in auditory cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(22), 11800-11806.
88. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1019-1025.
89. Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (2002). Neural mechanisms of object recognition. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 162-168.
90. Rockland, K. S., & Ojima, H. (2003). Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50, 19-26.
91. Rogers, T. T, Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., et al. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychologial and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111, 205-235.
92. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-695.
93. Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
94. Shelton, J. R., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 5-27.
95. Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 451-486.
96. Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. M. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
97. Stewart, F., Parkin, A. J., & Hunkin, N. M. (1992). Naming impairments following recovery from herpes simplex encephalitis: Category-specific? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 261-284.
98. Suzuki, W A., & Amaral, D. G. (1994). Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices of the macaque monkey: Cortical afferents. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 350, 497-533.
99. Tamura, H., Kaneko, H., & Fujita, I. (2005). Quantitative analysis of functional clustering of neurons in the macaque inferior temporal cortex. Neuroscience Research, 52, 311-322.
100. Tanaka, K. (1993). Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. Science, 262, 685-688.
101. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
102. Tanaka, K. (1997). Mechanisms of visual object recognition: Monkey and human studies. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 523-529.
103. Tanaka, K. (2003). Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: Clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 90-99.
104. Taylor, K. I., Devereux, B. J., Acres, K., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2011). Conceptual tructure predicts categorisation and identification of visual objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
105. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2004). The interplay between distinctiveness and intercorrelation in the automatic activation of word meaning [Abstract]. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 9, 109.
106. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2006). Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103(21), 8239-8244.
107. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2006). Perirhinal cortex lesions in humans impair the crossmodal integration of meaningful object features. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(Suppl), G73.
108. Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). The conceptual structure account: A cognitive model of semantic memory and its neural instantiation. In J. Hart & M. Kraut (Eds.), The neural basis of semantic memory (pp. 265-301). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
109. Taylor, K. I., Salamoura, A., Randall, B., Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2008). Clarifying the nature of distinctiveness by domain interaction in conceptual structure: A comment on Cree, McNorgan and McRae (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(3), 719-725.
110. Taylor, K. I., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Crossmodal integration of meaningful object features: Voxel-based correlations implicate anteromedial temporal lobe and temporal pole. Brain, 132(Pt 3), 671-683.
111. Tian, B., Reser, D., Durham, A., Kustov, A., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2001). Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex. Science, 292, 290-293.
112. Tootell, R. B., Nelissen, K., Vanduffel, W, & Orban, G. (2004). Search for color "center(s)" in macaque visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 14(4), 353-363.
113. Tyler, L. K., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., Levy, J. P., Voice, J. K., & Moss, H. E. (1996). Distinctiveness and correlations in the structure of categories: Behavioural data and a connectionist model. Brain and Language, 55, 89-91.
114. Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (1997). Functional properties of concepts: Studies of normal and braindamaged patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 511-545.
115. Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 244-252.
116. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231.
117. Tyler, L. K., Stamatakis, E. A., Bright, P., Acres, K., Abdallah, S., Rodd, J. M., et al. (2004). Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 351-362.
118. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
119. van Essen, D. C. (2004). Organization of visual areas in macaque and human cerebral cortex. In L. Chalupa & J. S. Werner (Eds.), The visual neurosciences (pp. 507-521). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
120. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Lewis, W., & Garrett, M. (2004). Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 2004.
121. Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 183-190.
122. Vinson, D. P., Vigliocco, G, Cappa, S., & Siri, S. (2003). The breakdown of semantic knowledge: Insights from a statistical model of meaning representation. Brain and Language, 86, 347-365.
123. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859-878.
124. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273-1296.
125. Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairment. Brain, 107, 829-853.