Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Rousselet, Guillaume A ^a   Pernet, Cyril R ^b   Bennett, Patrick J ^c   Sekuler, Allison B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PARAMETRIC TEST; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL TRIAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; METHODOLOGY; NOISE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NOISE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 54949117959     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-9-98     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bullier J Hupe JM James AC Girard P The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons Prog Brain Res 2001, 134:193-204. 11702544
2. Bullier J Integrated model of visual processing Brain Research Reviews 2001, 36(2-3):96-107. 11690606
3. DiCarlo JJ Cox DD Untangling invariant object recognition Trends Cogn Sci 2007, 11(8):333-41. 17631409
4. Rust NC Movshon JA In praise of artifice Nat Neurosci 2005, 8(12):1647-50. 16306892
5. Felsen G Dan Y A natural approach to studying vision Nat Neurosci 2005, 8(12):1643-6. 16306891
6. Logothetis NK Sheinberg DL Visual object recognition Annu Rev Neurosci 1996, 19:577-621. 15231738 8833455
7. Grill-Spector K Kushnir T Hendler T Edelman S Itzchak Y Malach R A sequence of object-processing stages revealed by fMRI in the human occipital lobe Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6(4):316-28. 9704268
8. Tanaka K Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: Clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities Cereb Cortex 2003, 13(1):90-9. 12466220
9. Tjan BS Lestou V Kourtzi Z Uncertainty and invariance in the human visual cortex J Neurophysiol 2006, 96(3):1556-68. 16723410
10. Hoffman KL Gothard KM Schmid MC Logothetis NK Facial-Expression and Gaze-Selective Responses in the Monkey Amygdala Curr Biol 2007. 17412586
11. Pernet C Schyns PG Demonet JF Specific, selective or preferential: comments on category specificity in neuroimaging Neuroimage 2007, 35(3):991-7. 17336096
12. Thorpe SJ Fabre-Thorpe M Seeking categories in the brain Science 2001, 291(5502):260-263. 11253215
13. Rousselet GA Thorpe SJ Fabre-Thorpe M How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? Trends Cogn Sci 2004, 8(8):363-370. 15335463
14. Schyns PG Petro LS Smith ML Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain for categorizing facial expressions Curr Biol 2007, 17(18):1580-5. 17869111
15. Hillyard SA Teder-Salejarvi WA Munte TF Temporal dynamics of early perceptual processing Curr Opin Neurobiol 1998, 8(2):202-10. 9635203
16. Rossion B Joyce CA Cottrell GW Tarr MJ Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex Neuroimage 2003, 20(3):1609-24. 14642472
17. Itier RJ Latinus M Taylor MJ Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? Neuroimage 2006, 29(2):667-76. 16169749
18. Rousselet GA Macé MJM Fabre-Thorpe M Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component? J Vis 2004, 4(1):13-21. 14995895
19. Bentin S Mouchetant-Rostaing Y Giard MH Echallier JF Pernier J ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: Time course and scalp distribution J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11(3):235-260. 10402254
20. Jeffreys DA Tukmachi ES The vertex-positive scalp potential evoked by faces and by objects Exp Brain Res 1992, 91(2):340-50. 1459236
21. Jeffreys DA Tukmachi ES Rockley G Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces Exp Brain Res 1992, 91(2):351-62. 1459237
22. Bötzel K Schulze S Stodieck SR Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials Exp Brain Res 1995, 104:135-43. 7621932
23. Joyce C Rossion B The face-sensitive N170 and VPP components manifest the same brain processes: The effect of reference electrode site Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116(11):2613-31. 16214404
24. Bentin S Taylor MJ Rousselet GA Itier RJ Caldara R Schyns PG Jacques C Rossion B Controlling interstimulus perceptual variance does not abolish N170 face sensitivity Nat Neurosci 2007, 10(7):801-2. 8996787 17593935
25. VanRullen R Thorpe SJ The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision- making J Cogn Neurosci 2001, 13(4):454-61. 11388919
26. Itier RJ Taylor MJ N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs Cereb Cortex 2004, 14(2):132-42. 12537576 14704210
27. Rousselet GA Macé MJM Thorpe SJ Fabre-Thorpe M Limits of ERP differences in tracking object processing speed J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19(8):1241-58. 17651000
28. Rousselet GA Husk JS Bennett PJ Sekuler AB Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences Journal of Vision 2008, 8(12):3. 18831616
29. Jemel B Schuller AM Cheref-Khan Y Goffaux V Crommelinck M Bruyer R Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component Neuroreport 2003, 14(16):2035-9. 14600493
30. Philiastides MG Ratcliff R Sajda P Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: A timing diagram J Neurosci 2006, 26(35):8965-75. 16943552
31. Philiastides MG Sajda P Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain Cereb Cortex 2006, 16(4):509-18. 16014865
32. Tanskanen T Nasanen R Montez T Paallysaho J Hari R Face recognition and cortical responses show similar sensitivity to noise spatial frequency Cereb Cortex 2005, 15(5):526-34. 15319307
33. Tanskanen T Nasanen R Ojanpaa H Hari R Face recognition and cortical responses: Effect of stimulus duration Neuroimage 2007, 35(4):1636-44. 17412612
34. Hauk O Davis MH Ford M Pulvermuller F Marslen-Wilson WD The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data Neuroimage 2006, 30(4):1383-400. 16460964
35. Schyns PG Jentzsch I Johnson M Schweinberger SR Gosselin F A principled method for determining the functionality of brain responses Neuroreport 2003, 14(13):1665-9. 14512834
36. Rousselet GA Husk JS Bennett PJ Sekuler AB Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs Journal of Vision 2005, 5(10):1. 15831062
37. Rousselet GA Husk JS Bennett PJ Sekuler AB Single-trial EEG dynamics of object and face visual processing Neuroimage 2007, 36(3):843-62. 17475510
38. Morrone MC Burr DC Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1988, 235(1280):221-45. 2907382
39. Thomson MG Foster DH Summers RJ Human sensitivity to phase perturbations in natural images: A statistical framework Perception 2000, 29:1057-1069. 11144819
40. Wichmann FA Braun DI Gegenfurtner KR Phase noise and the classification of natural images Vision Res 2006, 46(8-9):1520-9. 16384589
41. Drewes J Wichmann FA Gegenfurtner KR Classification of natural scenes: Critical features revisited Journal of Vision 2006, 6(6):561.
42. Jacques C Rossion B Concurrent processing reveals competition between visual representations of faces Neuroreport 2004, 15(15):2417-21. 15640767
43. Jacques C Rossion B The time course of visual competition to the presentation of centrally fixated faces J Vis 2006, 6(2):154-62. 16522142
44. Loschky LC Larson AM Localized information is necessary for scene categorization, including the Natural/Man-made distinction J Vis 2008, 8(1):4. 18318607
45. Joubert O Rousselet GA Fize D Fabre-Thorpe M Rapid visual categorization of natural scene contexts with equalized amplitude spectrum and increasing phase noise Journal of Vision
46. Dakin SC Hess RF Ledgeway T Achtman RL What causes non-monotonic tuning of fMRI response to noisy images? Curr Biol 2002, 12(14):R476-7. author reply R478 12176342
47. DeCarlo LT On the meaning and use of kurtosis Psychol Meth 1997, 2(3):292-307.
48. Kingdom FA Hayes A Field DJ Sensitivity to contrast histogram differences in synthetic wavelet-textures Vision Res 2001, 41(5):585-98. 11226504
49. Wilcox RR Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing Academic Press 2 2005.
50. Thomson MG Higher-order structure in natural images J Opt Soc Am A 1999, 16(7):1549-1553.
51. Sekuler AB Bennett PJ Visual neuroscience: Resonating to natural images Curr Biol 2001, 11(18):R733-6. 11566115
52. Olshausen BA Field DJ Sparse coding of sensory inputs Curr Opin Neurobiol 2004, 14(4):481-7. 15321069
53. Gold J Bennett PJ Sekuler AB Identification of band-pass filtered letters and faces by human and ideal observers Vision Res 1999, 39(21):3537-60. 10746125
54. Husk JS Bennett PJ Sekuler AB Inverting houses and textures: Investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects Vision Res 2007, 47(27):3350-9. 17988706
55. Oppenheim AV Lim JS The importance of phase in signals Proceedings of the IEEE 1981, 69:529-541.
56. Sekuler AB Bennett PJ Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion Percept Psychophys 1996, 58(2):174-90. 8838163
57. Portilla J Simoncelli EP A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients Int J Com Vis 2000, 40(1):49-71.
58. Tucker DM Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 87(3):154-63. 7691542
59. Delorme A Makeig S EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21. 15102499
60. Delorme A Sejnowski T Makeig S Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis Neuroimage 2007, 34(4):1443-9. 17188898
61. Simoncelli EP Olshausen BA Natural image statistics and neural representation Annu Rev Neurosci 2001, 24:1193-216. 11520932
62. Olman CA Ugurbil K Schrater P Kersten D BOLD fMRI and psychophysical measurements of contrast response to broadband images Vision Res 2004, 44(7):669-83. 14751552
63. Rainer G Augath M Trinath T Logothetis NK Nonmonotonic noise tuning of BOLD fMRI signal to natural images in the visual cortex of the anesthetized monkey Curr Biol 2001, 11:846-854. 11516645
64. Rainer G Augath M Trinath T Logothetis NK The effect of image scrambling on visual cortical BOLD activity in the anesthetized monkey Neuroimage 2002, 16(3 Pt 1):607-16. 12169247
65. Itier RJ Taylor MJ Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects Neuroreport 2004, 15(8):1261-5. 15167545
66. Itier RJ Herdman AT George N Cheyne D Taylor MJ Inversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG Brain Res 2006, 1115(1):108-20. 16930564
67. Murray MM Wylie GR Higgins BA Javitt DC Schroeder CE Foxe JJ The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: Combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging J Neurosci 2002, 22(12):5055-73. 12077201
68. Sehatpour P Molholm S Schwartz TH Mahoney JR Mehta AD Javitt DC Stanton PK Foxe JJ A human intracranial study of long-range oscillatory coherence across a frontal-occipital-hippocampal brain network during visual object processing Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(11):4399-404. 2393806 18334648
69. Smith ML Gosselin F Schyns PG From a face to its category via a few information processing states in the brain Neuroimage 2007, 37:974-84. 17611125