History and theory of flash-lag: Past, present, and future

Space and Time in Perception and Action

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 477-500

  Maus, Gerrit W ^a   Khurana, Beena ^b   Nijhawan, Romi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870813561     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511750540.027     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2003). The –flash-lag— effect occurs in audition and cross-modally. Current Biology 13(1): 59-63.
2. Bachmann, T., Luiga, I., Põder, E., & Kalev, K. (2003). Perceptual acceleration of objects in stream: evidence from fash-lag displays. Conscious Cogn 12: 279-297.
3. Baldo, M. V. C., Kihara, A. H., Namba, J., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and fashing stimuli. Perception 31: 17-30.
4. Baldo, M. V., & Klein, S. A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shiftf Nature 378: 565-566.
5. Berry, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A., & Meister, M. (1999). Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398(6725): 334-338.
6. Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 40: 1645-1648.
7. Burr, D. C., & Morgan, M. J. (1997). Motion deblurring in human vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264(1380): 431-436.
8. Cai, R., & Schlag, J. (2001). A new form of illusory conjunction between color and shape [Abstract]. J Vis 1(3): 127. Retrieved from doi:10.1167/1.3.127
9. Cavanagh, P. (1997). Predicting the present. Nature 386 (6620): 19, 21.
10. De Valois, R. L., & De Valois, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving gabors. Vision Res 31: 1619-1626.
11. Eagleman, D. M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287(5460): 2036-2038.
12. Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfndungszeit. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54: 58-78.
13. Fröhlich, F. W. (1929). Die Empfndungszeit. Jena: Gustav Fischer.
14. Fu, Y. X., Shen, S. Y., & Dan, Y. (2001). Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets. J Neurosci 21(20): (RC172).
15. Gegenfurtner, K. (1999). Neurobiology. The eyes have it! Nature 398(6725): 291-292.
16. Ghez, C., & Krakauer, J. (2000). The organization of movement. In E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, & T. M. Jessel (eds.), Principles of Neural Science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Hazelhoff, F., & Wiersma, H. (1924). Die Wahrnehmungszeit. Zeitschrift f¨ur Psychologie 96: 171-188.
18. Hess, C. (1904). Untersuchungen über den Erregungsvorgang im Sehorgan bei kurz- und länger dauernder Reizung. Pfügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie 101: 226-262.
19. Ichikawa, M., & Masakura, Y. (2006). Manual control of the visual stimulus reduces the fash-lag effect. Vision Res 46(14): 2192-2203.
20. James, W. (1890/1952). The Principles of Psychology. London: Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
21. Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Schoner, G., & Dinse, H. (2004). Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for fashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. J Physiol 556(Pt 3): 971-982.
22. Jordan, M. I. (1995). Computational motor control. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Khurana, B., & Nijhawan, R. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift: reply. Nature 378(6557): 565-566.
24. Khurana, B., Watanabe, K., & Nijhawan, R. (2000). The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects –corrected— or fashed objects attentionally delayedf Perception 29(6): 675-692.
25. Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Res 39(22): 3702-3709.
26. Köhler, W. (1947/1992). Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. New York: Liveright.
27. Kratz, K. E., & May, J. G. (1990). Response persistence of cat retinal ganglion cells to the temporally discrete presentation of sinewave gratings. Int J Neurosci 52(1-2): 111-119.
28. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Res 40(2): 201-215.
29. Krekelberg, B., & Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends Neurosci 24(6): 335-339.
30. Mach, E. (1885/1897). Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations (C. M.Williams, Trans.). Chicago: The Open Court Publishing Company.
31. MacKay, D. M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual feld containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181: 507-508.
32. Mateeff, S., & Hohnsbein, J. (1988). Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away. Vision Res 28(6): 711-719.
33. Maus, G. W., & Nijhawan, R. (2006). Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: the role of transient signals in perceiving position. Vision Res 46(26): 4375-4381.
34. Maus, G. W., & Nijhawan, R. (2008). Motion extrapolation into the blind spot. Psychol Sci 19(11): 1087-1091.
35. Meister, M., Wong, R. O., Baylor, D. A., & Shatz, C. J. (1991). Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. Science 252: 939-943.
36. Metzger, W. (1932). Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Ph¨anomene Fr¨ohlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfndungszeit. Psychologische Forschung 16, 176-200.
37. Mollon, J. D., & Perkins, a. J. (1996). Errors of judgement at Greenwich in 1796. Nature 380(6570): 101-102.
38. Namba, J., & Baldo, M. V. C. (2004). The modulation of the fash-lag effect by voluntary attention. Perception 33: 621-631.
39. Nijhawan, R. (1992). Misalignment of contours through the interaction of apparent and real motion systems. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33(4): 974.
40. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370(6487): 256-257.
41. Nijhawan, R. (1997). Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation. Nature 386(6620): 66-69.
42. Nijhawan, R. (2002). Neural delays, visual motion and the fash-lag effect. Trends Cogn Sci 6(9): 387-393.
43. Nijhawan, R. (2008a). Visual prediction: psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. Behav Brain Sci 31: 179-239.
44. Nijhawan, R. (2008b). Predictive perceptions, predictive actions, and beyond. Behav Brain Sci 31(2): 222-239.
45. Nijhawan, R., & Kirschfeld, K. (2003). Analogous mechanisms compensate for neural delays in the sensory and the motor pathways: evidence from motor fash-lag. Curr Biol 13(9): 749-753.
46. Nijhawan, R., Watanabe, K., Khurana, B., & Shimojo, S. (2004). Compensation for neural delays in visual-motor behaviour: no evidence for shorter afferent delays for visual motion. Vis Cogn 11: 275-298.
47. Nijhawan, R., & Wu, S. (2009). Compensating time delays with neural predictions: are predictions sensory or motorf Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 367: 1063-1078.
48. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S. S., Bedell, H. E., & Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396(6710): 424.
49. Raiguel, S. E., Lagae, L., Gulyas, B., & Orban, G. A. (1989). Response latencies of visual cells in macaque areas V1, V2 and V5. Brain Res 493(1): 155-159.
50. Ratliff, F. (1965). Mach Bands: Quantitative Studies on Neural Networks in the Retina. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day. Rojas-Anaya, H., Thirkettle, M., & Nijhawan, R. (2005). Flash-lag anisotrypy for movement in three domains [Abstract]. Perception 34(ECVP abstract supplement): 219-220.
51. Roulston, B. W., Self, M. W., & Zeki, S. (2006). Perceptual compression of space through position integration. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273(1600): 2507-2512.
52. Rubin, E. (1929). Kritisches und Experimentelles zur 'Empfndungszeit' Fr¨ohlichs. Psychologische Forschung 13: 101-112.
53. Schlag, J., Cai, R. H., Dorfman, A., Mohempur, A., & Schlag-Rey, M. (2000). Extrapolating movement without retinal motion. Nature 403: 38-39.
54. Sheth, B. R., Nijhawan, R., & Shimojo, S. (2000). Changing objects lead briefy fashed ones. Nat Neurosci 3(5): 489-495.
55. Sillito, A. M., Cudeiro, J., & Jones, H. E. (2006). Always returning: feedback and sensory processing in visual cortex and thalamus. Trends Neurosci 29(6): 307-316.
56. Sillito, A. M., & Jones, H. E. (2002). Corticothalamic interactions in the transfer of visual information. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357(1428): 1739-1752.
57. Sundberg, K. A., Fallah, M., & Reynolds, J. H. (2006). A motion-dependent distortion of retinotopy in area V4. Neuron 49(3): 447-457. van de Grind, W. (2002). Physical, neural, and mental timing. Conscious Cogn 11(2): 241-264; discussion 208-213.
58. Vroomen, J., & de Gelder, B. (2004). Temporal ventriloquism: sound modulates the fash-lag effect. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30(3): 513-518.
59. Whitney, D., & Murakami, I. (1998). Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nat Neurosci 1(8): 656-657.
60. Wojtach, W. T., Sung, K., Truong, S., & Purves, D. (2008). An empirical explanation of the fash-lag effect. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105: 16338-16343.