The "flash-lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally

Current Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 59-63

  Alais, David ^a   Burr, David ^a  

^a Ist di N del Cons Naz delle R   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037425586     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01402-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. MacKay, D.M. (1958). Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181, 507-508.
2. Nijhawan, R. (1994). Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370, 256-257.
3. Nijhawan, R. (1997). Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation. Nature 386, 66-69.
4. Purushothaman, G., Patel, S.S., Bedell, H.E., and Ogmen, H. (1998). Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396, 424-426.
5. Whitney, D., Murakami, I., and Cavanagh, P. (2000). Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Res. 40, 137-149.
6. Baldo, M.V.C., and Klein, S.A. (1995). Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature 378, 565-566.
7. Eagleman, D.M., and Sejnowski, T.J. (2000). Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287, 2036-2038.
8. Krekelberg, B., and Lappe, M. (2000). A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Res. 40, 201-215.
9. Krekelberg, B., and Lappe, M. (2001). Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects. Trends Neurosci. 24, 336-339.
10. Watson, A.B., and Pelli, D.G. (1983). QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept. Psychophys. 33, 113-120.
11. Welford, A.T. (1980). Reaction Times. (New York: Academic Press).
12. Misulis, K.E. (1994). Spehlmann's Evoked Potential Primer. (London: Butterworth Heinemann).
13. Watson, C.S., and Gengel, R.W. (1969). Signal duration and signal frequency in relation to auditory sesitivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 46, 989-997.
14. Nowak, L.G., Munk, M.H.J., Girard, P., and Bullier, J. (1995). Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. Vis. Neurosci. 12, 371-384.
15. Heil, P. (1997). Auditory cortical onset responses revisited. I. First-spike timing. J. Neurophysiol. 77, 2616-2641.
16. Brenner, E., and Smeets, J.B.J. (2000). Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Res. 40, 1645-1648.
17. Spence, C., Shore, D.I., and Klein, R.M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 799-832.
18. Spence, C., Nicholls, M.E.R., and Driver, J. (2000). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Percept. Psychophys. 63, 330-336.
19. Nishida, S., and Johnston, A. (2002). Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Curr. Biol. 12, 359-368.
20. Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. (New York: Chapman & Hall).