A direct interaction between DCP1 and XRN1 couples mRNA decapping to 5′ exonucleolytic degradation

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1324-1331

  Braun, Joerg E ^a   Truffault, Vincent ^a   Boland, Andreas ^a   Huntzinger, Eric ^a   Chang, Chung Te ^a   Haas, Gabrielle ^a,b   Weichenrieder, Oliver ^a   Coles, Murray ^a   Izaurralde, Elisa ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b INST DE BIOL MOLEC ET CELLULAIRE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DCP1 PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; PHOSPHODIESTERASE I; PROLINE; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XRN1 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENDOPEPTIDASES; EXORIBONUCLEASES; HUMANS; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEOLYSIS; RNA, MESSENGER; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84870790194     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2413     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Chen, C.Y. & Shyu, A.B. Mechanisms of deadenylation-dependent decay. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2, 167-183 (2011).
2. Houseley, J., LaCava, J. & Tollervey, D. RNA-quality control by the exosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 529-539 (2006).
3. Ling, S.H., Qamra, R. & Song, H. Structural and functional insights into eukaryotic mRNA decapping. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. RNA 2, 193-208 (2011).
4. Nissan, T., Rajyaguru, P., She, M., Song, H. & Parker, R. Decapping activators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae act by multiple mechanisms. Mol. Cell 39, 773-783 (2010).
5. Fenger-Grøn, M., Fillman, C., Norrild, B. & Lykke-Andersen, J. Multiple processing body factors and the ARE binding protein TTP activate mRNA decapping. Mol. Cell 20, 905-915 (2005).
6. Hsu, C.L. & Stevens, A. Yeast cells lacking 5′→3′ exoribonuclease 1 contain mRNA species that are poly(A) deficient and partially lack the 5′ cap structure. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4826-4835 (1993).
7. Muhlrad, D., Decker, C.J. & Parker, R. Deadenylation of the unstable mRNA encoded by the yeast MFA2 gene leads to decapping followed by 5′→3′ digestion of the transcript. Genes Dev. 8, 855-866 (1994).
8. Bouveret, E., Rigaut, G., Shevchenko, A., Wilm, M. & Seraphin, B. A Sm-like protein complex that participates in mRNA degradation. EMBO J. 19, 1661-1671 (2000).
9. Ozgur, S., Chekulaeva, M. & Stoecklin, G. Human Pat1b connects deadenylation with mRNA decapping and controls the assembly of processing bodies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 4308-4323 (2010).
10. Fromont-Racine, M. et al. Genome-wide protein interaction screens reveal functional networks involving Sm-like proteins. Yeast 17, 95-110 (2000).
11. Parker, R. & Sheth, U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol. Cell 25, 635-646 (2007).
12. Ball, L.J., Jarchau, T., Oschkinat, H. & Walter, U. EVH1 domains: structure, function and interactions. FEBS Lett. 513, 45-52 (2002).
13. Peterson, F.C. & Volkman, B.F. Diversity of polyproline recognition by EVH1 domains. Front. Biosci. 14, 833-846 (2009).
14. She, M. et al. Crystal structure of Dcp1p and its functional implications in mRNA decapping. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 249-256 (2004).
15. She, M. et al. Structural basis of Dcp2 recognition and activation by Dcp1. Mol. Cell 29, 337-349 (2008).
16. Tritschler, F. et al. DCP1 forms asymmetric trimers to assemble into active mRNA decapping complexes in metazoa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21591-21596 (2009).
17. Fromm, S.A. et al. The structural basis of Edc3-and Scd6-mediated activation of the Dcp1:Dcp2 mRNA decapping complex. EMBO J. 31, 279-290 (2012).
18. Jinek, M., Coyle, S.M. & Doudna, J.A. Coupled 5′ nucleotide recognition and processivity in Xrn1-mediated mRNA decay. Mol. Cell 41, 600-608 (2011).
19. Chang, J.H., Xiang, S., Xiang, K., Manley, J.L. & Tong, L. Structural and biochemical studies of the 5′→3′ exoribonuclease Xrn1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 270-276 (2011).
20. Volkman, B.F., Prehoda, K.E., Scott, J.A., Peterson, F.C. & Lim, W.A. Structure of the N-WASP EVH1 domain-WIP complex: insight into the molecular basis of Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome. Cell 111, 565-576 (2002).
21. Prehoda, K.E., Lee, D.J. & Lim, W.A. Structure of the enabled/VASP homology 1 domain-peptide complex: a key component in the spatial control of actin assembly. Cell 97, 471-480 (1999).
22. Fedorov, A.A., Fedorov, E., Gertler, F. & Almo, S.C. Structure of EVH1, a novel proline-rich ligand-binding module involved in cytoskeletal dynamics and neural function. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 661-665 (1999).
23. Carl, U.D. et al. Aromatic and basic residues within the EVH1 domain of VASP specify its interaction with proline-rich ligands. Curr. Biol. 9, 715-718 (1999).
24. Ball, L.J. et al. Dual epitope recognition by the VASP EVH1 domain modulates polyproline ligand specificity and binding affinity. EMBO J. 19, 4903-4914 (2000).
25. Beneken, J. et al. Structure of the Homer EVH1 domain-peptide complex reveals a new twist in polyproline recognition. Neuron 26, 143-154 (2000).
26. Barzik, M. et al. The N-terminal domain of Homer/Vesl is a new class II EVH1 domain. J. Mol. Biol. 309, 155-169 (2001).
27. Yu, J.H., Yang, W.H., Gulick, T., Bloch, K.D. & Bloch, D.B. Ge-1 is a central component of the mammalian cytoplasmic mRNA processing body. RNA 11, 1795-1802 (2005).
28. Jinek, M. et al. The C-terminal region of Ge-1 presents conserved structural features required for P-body localization. RNA 14, 1991-1998 (2008).
29. Bloch, D.B., Nobre, R.A., Bernstein, G.A. & Yang, W.H. Identification and characterization of protein interactions in the mammalian mRNA processing body using a novel two-hybrid assay. Exp. Cell Res. 317, 2183-2199 (2011).
30. Behm-Ansmant, I. et al. mRNA degradation by miRNAs and GW182 requires both CCR4:NOT deadenylase and DCP1:DCP2 decapping complexes. Genes Dev. 20, 1885-1898 (2006).
31. Eulalio, A. et al. Target-specific requirements for enhancers of decapping in miRNA-mediated gene silencing. Genes Dev. 21, 2558-2570 (2007).
32. Chekulaeva, M. et al. miRNA repression involves GW182-mediated recruitment of CCR4-NOT through conserved W-containing motifs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1218-1226 (2011).
33. Xu, J., Yang, J.Y., Niu, Q.W. & Chua, N.H. Arabidopsis DCP2, DCP1, and VARICOSE form a decapping complex required for postembryonic development. Plant Cell 18, 3386-3398 (2006).
34. Borja, M.S., Piotukh, K., Freund, C. & Gross, J.D. Dcp1 links coactivators of mRNA decapping to Dcp2 by proline recognition. RNA 17, 278-290 (2011).
35. Davey, N.E. et al. Attributes of short linear motifs. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 268-281 (2012).
36. Deshmukh, M.V. et al. mRNA decapping is promoted by an RNA-binding channel in Dcp2. Mol. Cell 29, 324-336 (2008).
37. Floor, S.N., Borja, M.S. & Gross, J.D. Interdomain dynamics and coactivation of the mRNA decapping enzyme Dcp2 are mediated by a gatekeeper tryptophan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2872-2877 (2012).
38. Haas, G. et al. HPat provides a link between deadenylation and decapping in metazoa. J. Cell Biol. 189, 289-302 (2010).
39. Braun, J.E., Huntzinger, E., Fauser, M. & Izaurralde, E. GW182 proteins recruit cytoplasmic deadenylase complexes to miRNA targets. Mol. Cell 44, 120-133 (2011).
40. Diebold, M.L., Fribourg, S., Koch, M., Metzger, T. & Romier, C. Deciphering correct strategies for multiprotein complex assembly by co-expression: application to complexes as large as the histone octamer. J. Struct. Biol. 175, 178-188 (2011).
41. Diercks, T., Daniels, M. & Kaptein, R. Extended flip-back schemes for sensitivity enhancement in multidimensional HSQC-type out-and-back experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 33, 243-259 (2005).
42. Carlomagno, T. et al. PLUSH TACSY: homonuclear planar TACSY with two-band selective shaped pulses applied to C(α),C′ transfer and C (β),C (aromatic) correlations. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 161-170 (1996).
43. Diercks, T., Coles, M. & Kessler, H. An efficient strategy for assignment of cross-peaks in 3D heteronuclear NOESY experiments. J. Biomol. NMR 15, 177-180 (1999).
44. Cornilescu, G., Delaglio, F. & Bax, A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR 13, 289-302 (1999).
45. Ginzinger, S.W. & Coles, M. SimShiftDB; local conformational restraints derived from chemical shift similarity searches on a large synthetic database. J. Biomol. NMR 43, 179-185 (2009).
46. Truffault, V. et al. The solution structure of the N-terminal domain of riboflavin synthase. J. Mol. Biol. 309, 949-960 (2001).
47. Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J. & Clore, G.M. Using Xplor-NIH for NMR molecular structure determination. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 48, 47-62 (2006).
48. Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J., Tjandra, N. & Clore, G.M. Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J. Magn. Reson. 160, 65-73 (2003).
49. Chen, V.B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12-21 (2010).
50. Davis, I.W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375-W383 (2007).