Relevance through consortium research? A case study

18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Otto, Boris ^a   Österle, Hubert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Case study; Consortium research; Design oriented IS research; Research relevance

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; COMMUNITY IS; CORPORATE DATA; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS;

DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84870650664     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Batini, C. and Scannapieco, M. (2006) Data Quality. Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Berlin.
2. Brinkkemper, S. (1996) Method Engineering: Engineering of Information Systems Development Methods and Tools. Information and Software Technology 38 (4), 275-280.
3. Brockhoff, K. (1999) Forschung und Entwicklung: Planung und Kontrolle. Oldenbourg, München.
4. Corbin, J. and Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 19 (6), 418-427.
5. Darke, P., Shanks, G. and Broadbent, M. (1998) Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal 8 (4), 273-289.
6. David, P. and Foray, D. (1994) Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
7. English, L. (2003) Total Information Quality Management - A Complete Methodology for IQ Management. http://www.information-management.com/issues/ 20030901/7320-1.html (2009- 05-07).
8. Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Research groups as "quasi firms": the invetion of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32, 109-121.
9. Følstad, A. (2008) Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10, 99-131.
10. Frank, U. (2000) Evaluation von Artefakten in der Wirtschaftsinformatikforschung. In Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik (Häntschel, I. and Heinrich, L. J., Eds), pp 35-48, Oldenbourg, München.
11. Grochla, E. (1982) Grundlagen der organisatorischen Gestaltung. Poeschel, Stuttgart.
12. Guide, V. D. R. J. and Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2007) Dancing with the Devil: Partnering with Industry but Publishing in Academia. Decision Sciences 4 (38), 531-546.
13. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004) Design Science in Information System Research. MIS Quarterly 28 (1), 75-105.
14. Hüner, K., Ofner, M. and Otto, B. (2009) Towards a Maturity Model for Corporate Data Quality Management. In 2009 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (Shin, D., Ed), pp 231-238, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
15. Hüner, K. and Otto, B. (2009) The Effect of Using a Semantic Wiki for Metadata Management: A Controlled Experiment. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Sprague, R. H., Ed), IEEE Computer Society, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA.
16. IBM (2007) The IBM Data Governance Council Maturity Model: Building a roadmap for effective data governance. IBM Corporation, Somers.
17. Iivari, J. and Venable, J. (2009) Action Research and Design Science Research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar. In 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009) (Newell, S. and Whitley, E. and Pouloudi, N. and Wareham, J. and Mathiassen, L., Eds), Verona, Italy.
18. Legner, C. and Schemm, J. (2008) Toward the Inter-organizational Product Information Supply Chain - Evidence from the Retail and Consumer Goods Industries. Journal of the AIS 9 (3/4), 120- 152.
19. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. (2001) The Transformation Of University-industry-government Relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5 (4).
20. March, S. T. and Smith, G. F. (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15, 251-266.
21. Morgan, D. L. and Krueger, R. A. (1993) When to use Focus Groups and why? In Successful Focus Groups (Morgan, D. L., Ed), pp 3-19, Sage, Newbury Park.
22. Nordsieck, F. (1968) Betriebsorganisation: Betriebsaufbau und Betriebsablauf. Poeschel, Stuttgart.
23. Nunamaker, J. F., Chen, M. and Purdin, T. D. M. (1991) Systems Development in Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3), 89-106.
24. Ofner, M., Hüner, K. and Otto, B. (2009) Dealing with Complexity: A Method to Adapt and Implement a Maturity Model for Corporate Data Quality Management. 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2009), San Francisco, CA, USA.
25. Olle, W. T. (1991) Information Systems Methodologies. Addison-Wesley, Kent.
26. Österle, H. and Otto, B. (2009) A Method For Consortial Research. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
27. Otto, B. and Hüner, K. (2009) Functional Reference Architecture for Corporate Master Data Management. Insitute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen.
28. Otto, B., Hüner, K. and Österle, H. (2009) Identification of Business Oriented Data Quality Metrics. In 14th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ 09) (Bowen, P. and Elmagarmid, K. and Österle, H. and Sattler, K.-U., Eds), pp 122-134, Potsdam, Germany.
29. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A. and Chatterjee, S. (2008) A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3), 45-77.
30. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M. and Daft, R. L. (2001) Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer between Practitioners and Academics. Academy of Mangement Journal 44 (2), 340-355.
31. SAP (2009) SAP Annual Report 2008. SAP AG, Walldorf.
32. Schmidt, A. and Otto, B. (2008) A Method for the Identification and Definition of Information Objects. In 13th International Conference on Information Quality (Neely, P. and Pipino, L. and Slone, J., Eds), pp 214-228, Cambridge, USA.
33. Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks.
34. Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001) Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research. British Journal of Management 12, S3-S26.
35. Strübing, J. (2008) Grounded Theory: Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung des Verfahrens der empirisch begründeten Theoriebildung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.
36. Susman, G. I. and Evered, R. D. (1978) An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (4), 582-603.
37. vom Brocke, J. (2007) Design Principles for Reference Modeling: Reusing Information Models by Means of Aggregation, Specialisation, Instantiation, and Analogy. In Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis (Fettke, P. and Loos, P., Eds), pp 47-75, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey.
38. Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L. and Strong, D. M. (1998) Manage Your Information as a Product. Sloan Management Review 39 (4), 95-105.
39. Wang, R. Y. and Strong, D. M. (1996) Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12 (4), 5-34.
40. Weber, K., Otto, B. and Österle, H. (2009) One Size Does Not Fit All - A Contingency Approach to Data Governance. ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality 1 (1), Art. No. 4.
41. Wilson, R. M. S. and Stenson, J. A. (2008) Valuation of information assets on the balance sheet: The recognition and approaches to the valuation of intangible assets. Business Information Review 25 (3), 167-182.
42. Winter, R. (2008) Design Science Research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17 (5), 470-475.
43. Yin, R. K. (2002) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.