Amethod for the identification and definition of information objects

Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Information Quality, ICIQ 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Schmidt, Alexander ^a   Otto, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Corporate Data Dictionary; Information Architecture; Information Objects; Transparency

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL LEVELS; ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES; GLOBAL SCALE; INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES; INFORMATION OBJECT; INTERNATIONAL SCOPE; ITERATIVE APPROACH; PROCESS LANDSCAPE;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SCIENCE; ITERATIVE METHODS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; TRANSPARENCY;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 84871577772     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Australian Government Locator Service "AGLS Metadata Element Set-Part1: Reference Description. Version 1.3." National Archives of Australia, Canberra, Australia 2002.
2. Balzert, H. Lehrbuch der Software-Technik-Software-Entwicklung. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. Heidelberg, 2000.
3. Baskerville, R. L., Pries-Heje, J. "Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice." Accounting Management And Information Technologies, 9(1999. pp. 1-23.
4. Baskerville, R. L., Wood-Harper, A. T. "Diversity in information systems action research methods." European Journal of Information Systems, 7(1998. pp. 90-107.
5. Berson, A., Dubov, L. Master Data Management and Customer Data Integration for a Global Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, 2007.
6. Bitterer, A., Newman, D. "Organizing for Data Quality." Gartner Research, Stamford, CT 2007.
7. Burnett, K., Ng, K. B., Park, S. "A Comparison of the Two Traditions of Metadata Development." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(13). 1999. pp. 1209-1217.
8. Checkland, P., Holwell, S. "Action Research: Its Nature and Validity." Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1). 1998. pp. 9-21.
9. Chisholm, M. "Master Data versus Reference Data." DM Review, 16(4). 2006.
10. Davidson, B., Lee, Y. W., Wang, R. Y. "Developing data production maps: meeting patient discharge data submission requirements." Int. J. Healthcare Technology and Management, 6(2). 2004. pp. 223-240.
11. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. 2008. Available at: http://dublincore. org/documents/dces.
12. Dyché, J., Levy, E. Customer Data Integration. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey, 2006.
13. English, L. P. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. 1th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, 1999.
14. Friedman, T. "Gartner Study on Data Quality Shows That IT Still Bears the Burden." Stamford: Gartner Group, 2006.
15. Gutzwiller, T. Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierten Informationssystemen. Physica. Heidelberg, 1994.
16. Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., Ram, S. "Design Science in Information Systems Research." Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1). 2004. pp. 75-105.
17. ISO "Information Technology-Metadata Registries (MDR). Part 4: Formulation of Data Definitions." International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva, Switzerland 1995.
18. ISO "Information Technology-Metadata Registries (MDR). Part 3: Registry Metamodel and Basic Attributes." International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2003.
19. IT Governance Institute "CobiT 4.0: Control Objectives, Management Guidelines, Maturity Models." IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows/IL 2005.
20. Lee, A. S. "Action as an artifact." in Information Systems Action Research An Applied View of Emerging Concepts and Methods, Ned Kock, Ed.: Springer US, 2007, pp. 43-60.
21. Leist, S., Zellner, G. "Evaluation of Current Architecture Frameworks." in Proceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC2006), April 23-27, 2006, New York, 2006, pp. 1546-1553.
22. March, S. T., Smith, G. F. "Design and natural science research on information technology." Decision Support Systems, 15(4). 1995. pp. 251-266.
23. Marco, D. Building and Managing the Meta Data Repository. A Full Lifecycle Guide. John Wiley & Sons. New Jersey, 2000.
24. Marco, D., Smith, A. M. "Metadata Management & Enterprise Architecture: Understanding Data Governance and Stewardship." DM Review, 16(9-11). 2006.
25. Newman, D., Logan, D. "Achieving Agility: How Enterprise Information Management Overcomes Information Silos." Gartner Research, Stamford, CT 2006.
26. Nilsson, A. "Management of Technochange in an Interorganizational E-government Project." in Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-41 2008), 2008.
27. O'Neil, B. K. Business Metadata: How To Write Definitions. Seiner, Robert S. 2005. Available at: http://www.tdan.com/i032fe01.htm.
28. O'Neil, B. K. Launching a Corporate Glossary. 2005. Available at: http://www.b-eyenetwork.com/view/1014.
29. OGC ITIL-Service Transition. TSO, 2007.
30. Open Group The Open Group Architecture Framework TOGAF-2007 Edition (Incorporating 8.1.1). Van Haren. Zaltbommel, 2007.
31. Päivärinta, T., Tyrväinen, P., Ylimäki, T. "Defining Organizational Document Metadata: A Case Beyond Standards." in Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Gdansk (Poland), 2002.
32. Rosenthal, A., Seligman, L., Renner, S. "From Semantic Integration to Semantics Management: Case Studies and a Way Forward." ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(4). 2004. pp. 44-50.
33. Scheer, A.-W. ARIS-Modellierungsmethoden, Metamodelle, Anwendungen. Springer- Verlag. Berlin et al., 2001.
34. Schreiber, Z. Semantic Information Architecture: Creating Value by Understanding Data. dm review. 2003. Available at: http://www.dmreview.com/ article.
35. Schwinn, A. "Entwicklung einer Methode zur Gestaltung von Integrationsarchitekturen für Informationssysteme." Bamberg: Universität St. Gallen, Difo Druck, 2005.
36. Shankaranarayan, G., Wang, R. Y., Ziad, M. "IP-MAP: Representing the Manufacture of an Information Product." in Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Information Quality, Boston, 2000.
37. Shankaranarayan, G., Ziad, M., Wang, R. Y. "Managing Data Quality in Dynamic Decision Environments: An Information Product Approach." Journal of Database Management, 14(4). 2003. pp. 14-32.
38. Shankaranarayanan, G., Even, A. "The Metadata Enigma." Communications of the ACM, 49(2). 2006. pp. 88-94.
39. Sommerville, I. Software Engineering. 8th ed. Pearson Studium, 2007.
40. Thome, G., Sollbach, W. Grundlagen und Modelle des Information Lifecycle Management. Springer. Berlin, 2007.
41. Tozer, G. Metadata Management. Artech House computing library. Norwood, Massachusetts, 1999.
42. Wende, K. "A Model for Data Governance-Organising Accountabilities for Data Quality Management." in Proceedings of 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Toowoomba, Australia, 2007, pp. 417-425.
43. Wilde, T., Hess, T. "Forschungsmethoden der Wirtschaftsinformatik. Eine empirische Untersuchung." Wirtschaftsinformatik, 49(4). 2007. pp. 280-287.