Towards a maturity model for corporate data quality management

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 231-238

  Hüner, Kai M ^a   Ofner, Martin ^a   Otto, Boris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST GALLEN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Action research; Corporate data quality; Data quality management; Design research; Maturity models; Reference modeling

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; BUSINESS DRIVERS; BUSINESS PROCESS; CORPORATE DATA; DATA ASSETS; DESIGN RESEARCH; HIGH QUALITY; INTEGRATED SERVICE; LEGAL REQUIREMENTS; MATURITY MODEL; REAL-WORLD SCENARIO; REFERENCE MODELS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA REDUCTION; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 72949094630     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1529282.1529334     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. R. L. Baskerville and A. T. Wood-Harper. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology, 11(3):235-246, 1996.
2. C. Batini and M. Scannapieco. Data Quality. Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. Springer, Berlin, 2006.
3. A. Berson and L. Dubov. Master Data Management and Customer Data Integration for a Global Enterprise. McGraw-Hill, 2007.
4. A. Bitterer. Gartner's data quality maturity model. Technical Report G00139742, Gartner Research, 2007.
5. M. Boisot and A. Canals. Data, information and knowledge: have we got it right? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(1):43-67, 2004.
6. R. Y. Cavana, B. L. Delahaye, and U. Sekaran. Applied Business research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Milton, Queensland, 3rd edition, 2001.
7. P. B. Crosby. Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. McGraw-Hill, 1979.
8. DataFlux. The data governance maturity model. Technical report, DataFlux Corporation, 2008.
9. T. de Bruin, R. Freeze, U. Kulkarni, and M. Rosemann. Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2005.
10. W. E. Deming. Out of the Crisis. MIT-Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1986.
11. EFQM. Assessing for excellence. Technical report, European Foundation for the Quality Management, 2003.
12. EFQM. Introducing excellence. Technical report, European Foundation for the Quality Management, 2003.
13. L. P. English. Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. Wiley, New York, NY, 1999.
14. M. J. Eppler and M. Helfert. A framework for the classification of data quality costs and an analysis of their progression. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Information Quality, 2004.
15. C. Farrukh, P. Fraser, and M. Gregory. Development of a structured approach to assessing practice in product development collaborations. Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers - Part B - Engineering Manufacture, 217, 2003.
16. P. Fettke and P. L. and. Multiperspective evaluation of reference models - towards a framework. In ER (Workshops). Springer, 2003.
17. U. Frank. Evaluation of reference models. In P. F. Fettke and P. Loos, editors, Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pages 118-139. IGI Publishing, 2006.
18. P. Fraser, J. Moultrie, and M. Gregory. The use of maturity models / grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2002.
19. T. Friedman. Gartner study on data quality shows that it still bears the burden. Technical Report G00137680, Gartner Research, 2006.
20. S. Gregor. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3):611-642, 2006.
21. A. R. Hevner, S. T. March, J. Park, and S. Ram. Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1):75-105, 2004.
22. M. Hult and S.-A. Lennung. Towards a definition of action research: A note and a bibliography. Journal of Management Studies, 17(2):241-250, 1980.
23. W. S. Humphrey. Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989.
24. IBM. The IBM data governance council maturity model: Building a roadmap for effective data governance. Technical report, IBM Software Group, 2007.
25. J. M. Juran. Juran on Planning for Quality. The Free Press, 1988.
26. Y. W. Lee, L. L. Pipino, J. D. Funk, and R. Y. Wang. Journey to Data Quality. MIT Press, Boston, 2006.
27. Y. W. Lee, D. M. Strong, B. K. Kahn, and R. Y. Wang. Aimq: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & Management, 40:133-146, 2002.
28. S. T. March and G. F. Smith. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4):251-266, 1995.
29. D. L. Moody. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 55(3):243-276, 2005.
30. D. Newman and D. Logan. Achieving agility: How enterprise information management overcomes information silos. Technical Report G00137817, Gartner Research, 2006.
31. J. Olson. Data Quality - The Accuracy Dimension. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2003.
32. B. Otto, K. Wende, A. Schmidt, and P. Osl. Towards a framework for corporate data quality management. In Proceedings of 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2007.
33. L. L. Pipino, Y. W. Lee, and R. Y. Wang. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4):211-218, 2002.
34. T. C. Redman. Data Quality. Digital Press, Boston, 2000.
35. A. Reid and M. Catterall. Invisible data quality issues in a CRM implementation. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 12(4):305-314, 2005.
36. M. Rosemann and T. de Bruin. Application of a holistic model for determining BPM maturity. In Proceedings of the AIM Pre-ICIS Workshop, 2005.
37. M. Rosemann, T. de Bruin, and T. Hueffner. A model for business process management maturity. In Proceedings of the 13th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2004.
38. K.-S. Ryu, J.-S. Park, and J.-H. Park. A data quality management maturity model. ETRI Journal, 28(2):191-204, 2006.
39. SEI. Appraisal Requirements for CMMI, Version 1.2 (ARC, V1.2). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2006.
40. SEI. CMMI for Development, Version 1.2. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2006.
41. G. Shankaranarayan, M. Ziad, and R. Y. Wang. Managing data quality in dynamic decision environments: An information product approach. Journal of Database Management, 14(4):14-32, 2003.
42. W. A. Shewhart. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand, New York, 1931.
43. C. Tellkamp, A. Angerer, E. Fleisch, and D. Corsten. From pallet to shelf: Improving data quality in retail supply chains using rfid. Cutter IT Journal, 17(9):19-24, 2004.
44. J. vom Brocke. Design principles for reference modeling: Reusing information models by means of aggregation, specialisation, instantiation, and analogy. In P. F. Fettke and P. Loos, editors, Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pages 47-75. IGI Publishing, 2006.
45. R. Y. Wang. A product perspective on total data quality management. Communications of the ACM, 41(2):58-65, 1998.
46. R. Y. Wang, Y. W. Lee, L. L. Pipino, and D. M. Strong. Manage your information as a product. Sloan Management Review, 39(4):95-105, 1998.
47. R. Y. Wang and D. M. Strong. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4):5-34, 1996.
48. K. Wende. A model for data governance - organising accountabilities for data quality management. In Proceedings of 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2007.