Projections of 21st Century Sierra Nevada Local Hydrologic Flow Components Using an Ensemble of General Circulation Models

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1104-1125

  Ficklin, Darren L ^a   Stewart, Iris T ^a   Maurer, Edwin P ^b  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Santa Clara University   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate variability change; Evapotranspiration; Hydrologic cycle; Infiltration; Precipitation; Snow hydrology; Surface water hydrology

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; CLIMATE VARIABILITY/CHANGE; CLIMATIC CHANGES; EMISSION SCENARIO; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; HYDROLOGIC CYCLES; HYDROLOGIC FLOW; SIERRA NEVADA; SNOW ACCUMULATION; SNOW HYDROLOGY; SNOWMELT; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; SUBSURFACE FLOW; SUBWATERSHEDS; SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS;

CLIMATE MODELS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDROLOGY; INFILTRATION; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL); RUNOFF; SNOW; SNOW MELTING SYSTEMS; WATER SUPPLY;

STREAM FLOW;

ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; CALIBRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; INFILTRATION; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); RUNOFF; SNOW ACCUMULATION; SNOWMELT; STREAMFLOW; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY; WATERSHED; WEATHER FORECASTING;

CALIFORNIA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84870562528     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: 17521688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2012.00675.x     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abbaspour, K.C., J. Yang, I. Maximov, R. Siber, K. Bogner, J. Mieleitner, J. Zobrist, and R. Srinivasan, 2007. Modelling Hydrology and Water Quality in the Pre-Alpine/Alpine Thur Watershed Using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology333:413-430.
2. Arnold, J.G., R. Srinivasan, R.S. Muttiah, and J. R. Williams, 1998. Large Area Hydrologic Modeling and Assessment Part I: Model Development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association34:73-89.
3. Barnett, T.P., J.C. Adam, and D.P. Lettenmaier, 2005. Potential Impacts of a Warming Climate on Water Availability in Snow-Dominated Regions. Nature438:303-309, doi: 310.1038/nature04141.
4. Barnett, T.P., D.W. Pierce, H.G. Hidalgo, C. Bonfils, B.D. Santer, T. Das, G. Bala, A.W. Wood, T. Nozawa, A.A. Mirin, D.R. Cayan, and M.D. Dettinger, 2008. Human-Induced Changes in the Hydrology of the Western United States. Science319:1080-1083, doi: 1010.1126/science.1152538.
5. Blumm, M. and T. Schwartz, 2003. Mono Lake and Evolving Public Trust in Western Water. Issues in Legal Scholarship1:1-40.
6. Brekke, L.D., N.L. Miller, K.E. Bashford, N.W.T. Quinn, and J.A. Dracup, 2004. Climate Change Impacts Uncertainty for Water Resources in the San Joaquin River Basin, California. Journal of the American Water Resources Association40:149-164.
7. Cayan, D.R., E.P. Maurer, M.D. Dettinger, M. Tyree, and K. Hayhoe, 2008. Climate Change Scenarios for the California Region. Climatic Change87(Suppl. 1):21-42, doi: 10.1007/s10584-10007-19377-10586.
8. Christensen, J.H., B. Hewitson, A. Busuioc, A. Chen, X. Gao, I. Held, R. Jones, R.K. Kolli, W.-T. Kwon, R. Laprise, V. Magaña Rueda, L. Mearns, C.G. Menéndez, J. Räisänen, A. Rinke, A. Sarr, and P. Whetton, 2007. Regional Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (Editors). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, pp. 847-940.
9. Coats, R., 2010. Climate Change in the Tahoe Basin: Regional Trends, Impacts and Drivers. Climatic Change102:435-466.
10. Coats, R., M. Costa-Cabral, J. Riverson, J. Reuter, G. Sahoo, G. Schladow, and B. Wolfe, 2012. Projected 21st Century Trends in Hydroclimatology of the Tahoe Basin. Climatic Change, in press.
11. Conklin, M.H. and F. Liu, 2006. Groundwater Contributions to Baseflow in the Merced River: Processes, Flow Paths, and Residence Times. PIER Final Project Report CEC-500-2007-116, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, California.
12. Cook, E.R., R. Seager, M.A. Cane, and D.W. Stahle, 2007. North American Drought: Reconstructions, Causes, and Consequences. Earth Science Reviews81:93-134.
13. Delworth, T.L., A.J. Broccoli, A. Rosati, R.J. Stouffer, V. Balaji, J.A. Beesley, W.F. Cooke, K.W. Dixon, J. Dunne, K.A. Dunne, J.W. Durachta, K.L. Findell, P. Ginoux, A. Gnanadesikan, C.T. Gordon, S.M. Griffies, R. Gudgel, M.J. Harrison, I.M. Held, R.S. Hemler, L.W. Horowitz, S.A. Klein, T.R. Knutson, P.J. Kushner, A.R. Langenhorst, H.-C. Lee, S.-J. Lin, J. Lu, S.L. Malyshev, P.C.D. Milly, V. Ramaswamy, J. Russell, M.D. Schwarzkopf, E. Shevliakova, J.J. Sirutis, M.J. Spelman, W.F. Stern, M. Winton, A.T. Wittenberg, B. Wyman, F. Zeng, and R. Zhang, 2006. GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models - Part 1: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics. Journal of Climate19:643-674.
14. Dettinger, M.D., 2005. From Climate-Change Spaghetti to Climate-Change Distributions for 21st Century California. San Francisco Estuary & Watershed Science3:1-14.
15. Dettinger, M.D., D.R. Cayan, M. Meyer, and A.E. Jeton, 2004. Simulated Hydrologic Responses to Climate Variations and Change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900-2099. Climatic Change62:283-317.
16. Diansky, N.A. and E.M. Volodin, 2002. Simulation of Present-Day Climate with a Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model. Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics (English Translation)38:732-747.
17. Eckhardt, K. and U. Ulbrich, 2003. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Groundwater Recharge and Streamflow in a Central European Low Mountain Range. Journal of Hydrology284(1-4):244-252.
18. Erman, N.A., 1996. Status of Aquatic Invertebrates. In Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, Vol. II, Chap. 35. University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, Davis.
19. Erman, N.A and C.D. Nagano, 1992. A Review of the California Caddisflies (Trichoptera) Listed as Candidate Species on the 1989 Federal "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Animal Notice of Review."California Fish and Game78(2):45-56.
20. 2 and Climate Change in the San Joaquin Valley Watershed of California. Environmental Pollution158:223-234.
21. Ficklin, D.L., I.T. Stewart, and E.P. Maurer, 2012. Effects of Projected Climate Change on the Hydrology in the Mono Lake Basin. Climatic Change, in press.
22. Flato, G.M., and G.J. Boer, 2001. Warming Asymmetry in Climate Change Simulations. Geophysical Research Letters28:195-198.
23. Fontaine, T.A., T.S. Cruickshank, J.G. Arnold, and R.H. Hotchkiss, 2002. Development of a Snowfall-Snowmelt Routine for Mountainous Terrain for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). Journal of Hydrology262:209-223.
24. Furevik, T., M. Bentsen, H. Drange, I.K.T. Kindem, and N.G. Kvamstø, 2003. Description and Evaluation of the Bergen Climate Model: ARPEGE Coupled with MICOM. Climate Dynamics21:27-51.
25. Gassman, P.W., M.R. Reyes, C.H. Green, and J.G. Arnold, 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers50:1211-1250.
26. Gedney, N., P.M. Cox, R.A. Betts, O. Boucher, C. Huntingford, and P.A. Scott, 2006. Detection of a Direct Carbon Dioxide Effect in Continental Runoff Records. Nature439:835-838.
27. Gleick, P.H. (Editor), 1993. Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World's Fresh Water Resources. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Gleick, P.H. and E.L. Chalecki, 1999. The Impacts of Climatic Changes for Water Resources of the Colorado and Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins. Journal of the American Water Resources Association35(6):1429-1441.
29. Gordon, C., C. Cooper, C.A. Senior, H. Banks, J.M. Gregory, T.C. Johns, J.F.B. Mitchell, and R.A. Wood, 2000. The Simulation of SST, Sea Ice Extents and Ocean Heat Transports in a Version of the Hadley Centre Coupled Model Without Flux Adjustments. Climate Dynamics16:147-168.
30. Gordon, H.B., L.D. Rotstayn, J.L. McGregor, M.R. Dix, E.A. Kowalczyk, S.P. O'Farrell, L.J. Waterman, A.C. Hirst, S.G. Wilson, M.A. Collier, I.G. Watterson, and T.I. Elliott, 2002. The CSIRO Mk3 Climate System Model, CSIRO Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 60. CSIRO. Division of Atmospheric Research, Victoria, Australia, p. 130.
31. Hanson, R.T., M.W. Newhouse, and M.D. Dettinger, 2004. A Methodology to Assess Relations Between Climatic Variability and Variations in Hydrologic Time Series in the Southwestern United States. Journal of Hydrology287:252-269.
32. Hawkins, E. and R. Sutton, 2009. The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society90:1095-1107.
33. Hawkins, E. and R.T. Sutton, 2011. The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Projections of Regional Precipitation Change. Climate Dynamics37(1-2):407-418.
34. Hayhoe, K., D. Cayan, C.B. Field, P.C. Frumhoff, E.P. Maurer, N.L. Miller, S.C. Moser, S.H. Schneider, K.N. Cahill, E.E. ClelL. Dale, R. Drapek, R.M. Hanemann, L.S. Kalkstein, J. Lenihan, C.K. Lunch, R.P. Neilson, S.C. Sheridan, and J.H. Verville, 2004. Emissions Pathways, Climate Change, and Impacts on California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences101:12422-12427.
35. Hershler, R., 1994. A Review of the North American Freshwater Snail Genus Pyrgulopsis (Hydrobiidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 554. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
36. IPSL, 2005. The New IPSL Climate System Model: IPSL-CM4. Institut Pierre Simon Laplace des Sciences de l'Environnement Global, Paris, France, p. 73.
37. Jungclaus, J.H., M. Botzet, H. Haak, N. Keenlyside, J.-J. Luo, M. Latif, J. Marotzke, U. Mikolajewicz, and E. Roeckner, 2006. Ocean Circulation and Tropical Variability in the AOGCM ECHAM5/MPI-OM. Journal of Climate19:3952-3972.
38. K-1 Model Developers, 2004. K-1 Coupled Model (MIROC) Description, K-1 Technical Report, 1. Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, p. 34.
39. Kiehl, J.T., J.J. Hack, G.B. Bonan, B.B. Boville, D.L. Williamson, and P.J. Rasch, 1998. The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3. Journal of Climate11:1131-1149.
40. Knowles, N. and D.R. Cayan, 2002. Potential Effects of Global Warming on the Sacramento/San Joaquin Watershed and the San Francisco Estuary. Geophysical Research Letter29(18):1891.
41. Knowles, N. and D.R. Cayan, 2004. Elevational Dependence of Projected Hydrologic Changes in the San Francisco Estuary and Watershed. Climatic Change62:319-336.
42. Knowles, N., M. Dettinger, and D. Cayan, 2006. Trends in Snowfall Versus Rainfall for the Western United States. Journal of Climate19:4545-4559.
43. Krause, P., D.P. Boyle, and F. Bäse, 2005. Comparison of Different Efficiency Criteria for Hydrological Model Assessment. Advances in Geosciences5:89-97.
44. Legutke, S. and R. Voss, 1999. The Hamburg Atmosphere-Ocean Coupled Circulation Model ECHO-G, Technical Report, No. 18. German Climate Computer Centre (DKRZ), Hamburg, Germany, p. 62.
45. Lettenmaier, D.P. and T.Y. Gan, 1990. Hydrologic Sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin, California, to Global Warming. Water Resources Research26:69-86.
46. Maurer, E.P., 2007. Uncertainty in Hydrologic Impacts of Climate Change in the Sierra Nevada, California Under Two Emissions Scenarios. Climatic Change82:309-325, doi: 310.1007/s10584-10006-19180-10589.
47. Maurer, E.P., L.D. Brekke, and T. Pruitt, 2010b. Contrasting Lumped and Distributed Hydrology Models for Estimating Climate Change Impacts on California Watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association46(5):1024-1035.
48. Maurer, E.P. and P.B. Duffy, 2005. Uncertainty in Projections of Streamflow Changes Due to Climate Change in California. Geophysical Research Letters32:L03704, doi: 03710.01029/02004GL021462.
49. Maurer, E.P., H.G. Hidalgo, T. Das, M.D. Dettinger, and D.R. Cayan, 2010a. The Utility of Daily Large-Scale Climate Data in the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Daily Streamflow in California. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences14:1125-1138, doi: 1110.5194/hess-1114-1125-2010.
50. Maurer, E.P., A.W. Wood, J.C. Adam, D.P. Lettenmaier, and B. Nijssen, 2002. A Long-Term Hydrologically-Based Data Set of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States. Journal of Climate15:3237-3251.
51. 2 Concentrations: A Synthesis. New Phytologist149:247-264.
52. Meehl, G.A., C. Covey, T. Delworth, M. Latif, B. McAvaney, J.F.B. Mitchell, R.J. Stouffer, and K.E. Taylor, 2007a. The WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society88:1383-1394.
53. Meehl, G.A., C. Tebaldi, H. Teng, and T.C. Peterson, 2007b. Current and Future U.S. Weather Extremes and El Niño. Geophysical Research Letters34:L20704, doi: 20710.21029/22007GL031027.
54. Mehta, V.K., D.E. Rheinheimer, D. Yates, D.R. Purkey, J.H. Viers, C.A. Young, and J.F. Mount, 2011. Potential Impacts of Hydrology and Hydropower Production Under Climate Warming of the Sierra Nevada. Journal of Water and Climate Change2(1):29-43.
55. Miller, N.L., K.E. Bashford, and E. Strem, 2003. Potential Impacts of Climate Change on California Hydrology. Journal of the American Water Resources Association39:771-784.
56. Monteith, J.I.L., 1965. Evaporation and Environment. Academic Press, New York.
57. Moriasi, D.N., J.G. Arnold, M.W.V. Liew, R.L. Bingner, R.D. Harmel, and T.L. Veith, 2007. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers50:885-900.
58. Morison, J.I.L. and R.M. Gifford, 1983. Stomatal Sensitivity to Carbon Dioxide and Humidity. Plant Physiology71:789-796.
59. Moss, R.H., J.A. Edmonds, K.A. Hibbard, M.R. Manning, S.K. Rose, D.P. van Vuuren, T.R. Carter, S. Emori, M. Kainuma, T. Kram, G.A. Meehl, J.F.B. Mitchell, N. Nakicenovic, K. Riahi, S.J. Smith, R.J. Stouffer, A.M. Thomson, J.P. Weyant, and T.J. Wilbanks, 2010. The Next Generation of Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment. Nature463:747-756.
60. Najafi, M., H. Moradkhani, and I. Jung, 2011. Assessing the Uncertainties of Hydrologic Model Selection in Climate Change Impact Studies. Hydrologic Processes25(18):2814-2826.
61. Nash, J.E. and J.V. Sutcliffe, 1970. River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models Part I - A Discussion of Principles. Journal of Hydrology10:282-290.
62. Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniry, J.R. Williams, and K.W. King, 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation: Version 2005. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas.
63. Null, S.E., J.H. Viers, and J.F. Mount, 2010. Hydrologic Response and Watershed Sensitivity to Climate Warming in California's Sierra Nevada. PLoS ONE5:e9932.
64. Penman, H.L., 1956. Evaporation: An Introductory Survey. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science9-29:87-97, 151-153.
65. Ralph, F.M. and M.D. Dettinger, 2011. Storms, Floods, and the Science of Atmospheric Rivers. Eos92(32):265-266.
66. 2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104(42):10288-10293.
67. Roe, G.H. and M.B. Baker, 2007. Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?Science318:629-632.
68. Russell, G.L., J.R. Miller, D. Rind, R.A. Ruedy, G.A. Schmidt, and S. Sheth, 2000. Comparison of Model and Observed Regional Temperature Changes During the Past 40Years. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres105:14891-14898.
69. 2 Transient Increase in the GISS Coupled Model: Regional Coolings in a Warming Climate. Journal of Climate12:531-539.
70. Salas-Mélia, D., F. Chauvin, M. Déqué, H. Douville, J.F. Gueremy, P. Marquet, S. Planton, J.F. Royer, and S. Tyteca, 2005. Description and Validation of the CNRM-CM3 Global Coupled Model, CNRM Working Note 103. Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Météo-France, Toulouse, France, p. 36.
71. Sanderson, B.M., C. Piani, W.J. Ingram, D.A. Stone, and M.R. Allen, 2007. Toward Constraining Climate Sensitivity by Linear Analysis of Feedback Patterns in Thousands of Perturbed-Physics GCM Simulations. Climate Dynamics30:175-190.
72. SCS, 1984. SCS National Engineering Handbook. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
73. Stewart, I.T., D.R. Cayan, and M.D. Dettinger, 2004. Changes in Snowmelt Runoff Timing in Western North America Under a 'Business As Usual' Climate Change Scenario. Climatic Change62:217-232.
74. Stewart, I.T., D.R. Cayan, and M.D. Dettinger, 2005. Changes Toward Earlier Streamflow Timing Across Western North America. Journal of Climate18:1136-1155.
75. Tanaka, S.K., T. Zhu, J.R. Lund, R.E. Howitt, M.W. Jenkins, M.A. Pulido, M. Tauber, R.S. Ritzema, and I.C. Ferreira, 2006. Climate Warming and Water Management Adaptation for California. Climatic Change76:361-387.
76. USDA-SCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service), 1993. State Soil Geographic Data Base (STATSGO). Miscellaneous Publication No. 1492, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
77. USGS, 2007. NLCD 2001 Land Dover. U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
78. Van Rheenen, N.T., A.W. Wood, R.N. Palmer, and D.P. Lettenmaier, 2004. Potential Implications of PCM Climate Change Scenarios for Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin Hydrology and Water Resources. Climatic Change62:257-281.
79. Vicuna, S., E.P. Maurer, B. Joyce, J.A. Dracup, and D. Purkey, 2007. The Sensitivity of California Water Resources to Climate Change Scenarios. Journal of the American Water Resources Association43:482-498, doi: 410.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00038.x.
80. Washington, W.M., J.W. Weatherly, G.A. Meehl, A.J. Semtner, T.W. Bettge, A.P. Craig, W.G. StrJ. Arblaster, V.B. WaylR. James, and Y. Zhang, 2000. Parallel Climate Model (PCM) Control and Transient Simulations. Climate Dynamics16:755-774.
81. Wiggins, G.B., 1990. Systematics of North American Trichoptera: Present Status and Future Prospects. In: Systematics of the North American Insects and Arachnids: Status and Needs, M. Kosztarab and C.W. Schaefer (Editors). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Blacksburg, Virginia, pp. 203-210.
82. 2 Effects on Streamflow. Nature314:149-152.
83. Wood, A.W., L.R. Leung, V. Sridhar, and D.P. Lettenmaier, 2004. Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs. Climatic Change62:189-216.
84. Wood, A.W., E.P. Maurer, A. Kumar, and D.P. Lettenmaier, 2002. Long-Range Experimental Hydrologic Forecasting for the Eastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres107:4429, doi: 4410.1029/2001JD000659.
85. Young, C.A., M.I. Escobar-Arias, M. Fernandes, B. Joyce, M. Kiparsky, J.F. Mount, V.K. Mehta, D. Purkey, J.H. Viers, and D. Yates, 2009. Modeling the Hydrology of Climate Change in California's Sierra Nevada for Subwatershed Scale Adaptation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association46(6):1409-1423.
86. Yukimoto, S., A. Noda, A. Kitoh, M. Sugi, Y. Kitamura, M. Hosaka, K. Shibata, S. Maeda, and T. Uchiyama, 2001. The New Meteorological Research Institute Coupled GCM (MRI-CGCM2), Model Climate and Variability. Papers in Meteorology and Geophysics51:47-88.
87. Zhu, T., M.W. Jenkins, and J.R. Lund, 2005. Estimated Impacts of Climate Warming on California Water Availability Under Twelve Future Climate Scenarios. Journal of the American Water Resources Association41:1027-1038.