Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 284, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 244-252

  Eckhardt, K ^a   Ulbrich, U ^b  

^a METCON Umweltmeteorologische B   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate change; Groundwater recharge; Leaf area; Stomatal conductance; Streamflow

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE CHANGE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS; STREAM FLOW; WATER QUALITY;

SNOWMELTS; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

HYDROLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; GENERAL CIRCULATION MODEL; GROUNDWATER; LEAF AREA; PARAMETERIZATION; RECHARGE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; STREAMFLOW;

EID: 0346432367     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arnold. J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S., Williams, J.R., 1998. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, part I: model development. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 34, 73-89.
2. ATV (Abwassertechnische Vereinigung), 1995. Arbeitsblatt ATV-A106-10/95: Entwurf und Bauplanung von Abwasserbehandlungsanlagen. Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V., Hennef, Germany.
3. Breuer, L., Eckhardt, K., Frede, H.-G., 2003. Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates, Ecological Modelling, in press.
4. Cruise, J.F., Limaye, A.S., Al-Abed, N., 1999. Assessment of impacts of climate change on water quality in the south eastern United States. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 35, 1539-1550.
5. Eckhardt, K., Arnold, J.G., 2001. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. J. Hydrol. 251, 103-109.
6. Eckhardt, K., Haverkamp, S., Fohrer, N., Frede, H.-G., 2002. SWAT-G, a version of SWAT99.2 modified for application to low mountain range catchments. Phys. Chem. Earth 27, 641-644.
7. Eckhardt, K., Fohrer, N., Frede, H.-G., 2003. Automatic model calibration, Hydrological Processes, accepted.
8. 2: implications from the plant to the global scale. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1214-1225.
9. Fontaine, T.A., Klassen, J.F., Cruickshank, T.S., Hotchkiss, R.H., 2001. Hydrological response to climate change in the Black Hills of South Dakota, USA. Hydrol. Sci. J. 46, 27-40.
10. Hanratty, M.P., Stefan, H.G., 1998. Simulating climate change effects in a Minnesota agricultural watershed. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 1524-1532.
11. IPCC, 2001. In: Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C.A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Krüger, A., Ulbrich, U., Speth, P., 2001. Groundwater recharge in Northrhine-Westfalia predicted by a statistical model for greenhouse gas scenarios. Phys. Chem. Earth (B) 26, 853-861.
13. McCuen, R.H., 1998. Hydrological Analysis and Design, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. 2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol. 149, 247-264.
15. Monteith, J.L., 1965. Evaporation and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 19, 205-234.
16. 2. In: Zeiger, E., Cowan, I.R., Farquhar, G.D. (Eds.), Stomatal Function, Stanford University Press, Stanford, USA, pp. 229-251.
17. Morison, J.I.L., Gifford, R.M., 1983. Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity. Plant Physiol. 71, 789-796.
18. Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., Jung, T.Y., Kram, T., La Rovere, E.L., Michaelis, L., Mori, S., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., Price, L., Raihi, K., Roehrl, A., Rogner, H.-H., Sankovski, A., Schlesinger, M., Shukla, P., Smith, S., Swart, R., van Rooijen, S., Victor, N., Dadi, Z., 2000. IPCC Special Report on Emission Scenarios, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.E., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282-290.
20. 2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 683-714.
21. Parry, M.L. (Ed.), 2000. Assessment of Potential Effects and Adaptations for Climate Change in Europe: The Europe ACACIA Project, Jackson Environment Institute, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
22. 2 and plant structure: a review. Global Change Biol. 5, 807-837.
23. Rosenberg, N.J., Epstein, D.J., Wang, D., Vail, L., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J.G., 1999. Possible impacts of global warming on the hydrology of the Ogallala Aquifer Region. Climatic Change 42, 677-692.
24. 2 atmosphere. New Phytol. 139, 395-436.
25. Sloan, P.G., Moore, I.D., 1984. Modeling subsurface stormflow on steeply sloping forested watersheds. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1815-1822.
26. Stockle, C.O., Williams, J.R., Rosenberg, N.J., Jones, C.A., 1992. A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: part 1: modification of the EPIC model for climate change analysis. Agr. Syst. 38, 225-238.
27. Stonefelt, M.D., Fontaine, T.A., Hotchkiss, R.H., 2000. Impacts of climate change on water yield in the Upper Wind River Basin. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 36, 321-336.
28. USDA-SCS (US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service), 1972. National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology, Chapters 4-10.
29. 2 concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biol. 5, 723-741.
30. Williams, J.R., Jones, C.A., Dyke, P.T., 1984. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. T. ASAE 27, 129-144.
31. Wohlrab, B., Ernstberger, H., Meuser, A., Sokollek, V., 1992. Landschaftswasserhaushalt, Paul Parey, Hamburg and Berlin, Germany.