Diastolic filling vortex forces and cardiac adaptations: Probing the epigenetic nexus

Hellenic Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 458-469

  Pasipoularides, Ares ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac cytomechanics; Cardiac gene regulation; Endocardial vortical shear and squeeze; Epigenetic factors; Filling vortex forces; Flowimaging modalities; Intracardiac flow

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; GLYCOPROTEIN; INTEGRIN; PERFLUTREN; TUBULIN;

BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CYTOSKELETON; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; ENDOCARDIUM; EPIGENETICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FILLING; HUMAN; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SHEAR STRESS; VORTEX MOTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOMECHANICS; CYTOSKELETON; DIASTOLE; EPIGENOMICS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HEART; HUMANS;

EID: 84870414055     PISSN: 11099666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (119)

1. Pasipoularides A. Heart's vortex: intracardiac blood flow phenomena. Shelton, CT: People's Medical Publishing House; 2010. 960 p. See, in particular, Chapter 9. Vortex formation in fluid flow, p. 442-480.
2. ibid. See, particularly, Chapter 5. Micromanometric, velocimetric, angioand echocardiographic measurements, p. 234-297, Chapter 10. Cardiac computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and real-time 3-D echocardiography, p. 482-581, and Chapter 11. Postprocessing exploration techniques and display of tomographic data, p. 582-622.
3. Brutsaert DL. Cardiac endothelial-myocardial signaling: its role in cardiac growth, contractile performance, and rhythmicity. Physiol Rev. 2003; 83: 59-115.
4. Pasipoularides A, Palacios I, Frist W, Rosenthal S, Newell JB, Powell WJ Jr. Contribution of activation-inactivation dynamics to the impairment of relaxation in hypoxic cat papillary muscle. Am J Physiol. 1985; 248(1 Pt 2): R54-62.
5. Pasipoularides A. Fluid dynamic aspects of ejection in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011; 52: 416-426.
6. Pasipoularides A. LV twisting and untwisting in HCM: ejection begets filling. Diastolic functional aspects of HCM. Am Heart J. 2011; 162: 798-810.
7. Carlhäll CJ, Bolger A. Passing strange: flow in the failing ventricle. Circ Heart Fail. 2010; 3: 326-331.
8. Luo J, Konofagou EE. Imaging of wall motion coupled with blood flow velocity in the heart and vessels in vivo: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011; 37: 980-995.
9. Cloutier G, Chen D, Durand LG. A new clutter rejection algorithm for Doppler ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2003; 22: 530-538.
10. Uejima T, Koike A, Sawada H, et al. A new echocardiographic method for identifying vortex flow in the left ventricle: numerical validation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010; 36: 772-788.
11. Lu J, Li W, Zhong Y, Luo A, Xie S, Yin L. Intuitive visualization and quantification of intraventricular convection in acute ischemic left ventricular failure during early diastole using color Doppler-based echocardiographic vector flow mapping. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 28: 1035-1047.
12. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 2. Handy mathematical instruments of thought, p. 45-114, and Chapter 15. Fluid dynamic epigenetic factors in cardiogenesis and remodeling, p. 808-850.
13. Westerdale J, Belohlavek M, McMahon EM, Jiamsripong P, Heys JJ, Milano M. Flow velocity vector fields by ultrasound particle imaging velocimetry: in vitro comparison with optical flow velocimetry. J Ultrasound Med. 2011; 30: 187-195.
14. Sengupta PP, Burke R, Khandheria BK, Belohlavek M. Following the flow in chambers. Heart Fail Clin. 2008; 4: 325-332.
15. Pierrakos O, Vlachos PP, Telionis DP. Time-resolved DPIV analysis of vortex dynamics in a left ventricular model through bileaflet mechanical and porcine heart valve prostheses. J Biomech Eng. 2004; 126: 714-726.
16. Zhang F, Lanning C, Mazzaro L, et al. In vitro and preliminary in vivo validation of echo particle image velocimetry in carotid vascular imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011; 37: 450-464.
17. Kheradvar A, Houle H, Pedrizzetti G, et al. Echocardiographic particle image velocimetry: a novel technique for quantification of left ventricular blood vorticity pattern. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010; 23: 86-94.
18. Hong GR, Pedrizzetti G, Tonti G, et al. Characterization and quantification of vortex flow in the human left ventricle by contrast echocardiography using vector particle image velocimetry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 1: 705-717.
19. Gatehouse PD, Keegan J, Crowe LA, et al. Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 2172-2184.
20. Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011; 13: 7.
21. Eriksson J, Carlhall CJ, Dyverfeldt P, Engvall J, Bolger AF, Ebbers T. Semi-automatic quantification of 4D left ventricular blood flow. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010; 12: 9.
22. Madore B, Hoge WS, Chao TC, Zientara GP, Chu R. Retrospectively gated cardiac cine imaging with temporal and spatial acceleration. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 29: 457-469.
23. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, in particular, Chapter 10. Cardiac computed tomography, magnetic resonance, and real-time 3-D echocardiography, p. 482-581, Chapter 12. Computational fluid dynamics, or "CFD," p. 623-679, and Appendix A. Functional Imaging as numerical flow field visualization, and its verification and validation, p. 891-903.
24. Pasipoularides A. To the editor: functional imaging(FI) combines imaging datasets and computational fluid dynamics to simulate cardiac flows. J Appl Physiol. 2008; 105: 1015; author reply 1019.
25. Pasipoularides AD, Shu M, Womack MS, Shah A, Von Ramm O, Glower DD. RV functional imaging: 3-D echoderived dynamic geometry and flow field simulations. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H56-65.
26. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 13. CFD of ventricular ejection, p. 680-734.
27. Georgiadis JG, Wang M, Pasipoularides A. Computational fluid dynamics of left ventricular ejection. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992; 20: 81-97.
28. Pasipoularides A. Clinical assessment of ventricular ejection dynamics with and without outflow obstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 859-882.
29. Pasipoularides A. Cardiac mechanics: basic and clinical contemporary research. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992; 20: 3-17.
30. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 14. CFD of ventricular filling: heart's vortex, p. 735-807.
31. Pasipoularides A, Shu M, Shah A, Womack MS, Glower DD. Diastolic right ventricular filling vortex in normal and volume overload states. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H1064-1072.
32. Pasipoularides A, Shu M, Shah A, Tucconi A, Glower DD. RV instantaneous intraventricular diastolic pressure and velocity distributions in normal and volume overload awake dog disease models. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 285: H1956-1965.
33. Pasipoularides A. Analysis of vortex flow imaging in normal and dysfunctional RV's. American Society of Echocardiography 22nd Annual Scientific Sessions, Montreal, 2011. EE02d - Flow Vortex Imaging; PROLibraries.com.
34. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 4. Fluid dynamics of unsteady flow, p. 165-233, Chapter 9. Vortex formation in fluid flow, p. 442-480, and Chapter 13. CFD of ventricular ejection, p. 680-734.
35. Bellhouse BJ. Fluid mechanics of a model mitral valve and left ventricle. Cardiovasc Res. 1972; 6: 199-210.
36. Taylor DE, Wade JD. Pattern of blood flow within the heart: a stable system. Cardiovasc Res. 1973; 7: 14-21.
37. Fredriksson AG, Zajac J, Eriksson J, et al. 4-D blood flow in the human right ventricle. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011; 301: H2344-50.
38. Faludi R, Szulik M, D'Hooge J, et al. Left ventricular flow patterns in healthy subjects and patients with prosthetic mitral valves: an in vivo study using echocardiographic particle image velocimetry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139: 1501-1510.
39. Doenst T, Spiegel K, Reik M, et al. Fluid-dynamic modeling of the human left ventricle: methodology and application to surgical ventricular reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87: 1187-1195.
40. Bolger AF, Heiberg E, Karlsson M, et al. Transit of blood flow through the human left ventricle mapped by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007; 9: 741-747.
41. Saber NR, Wood NB, Gosman AD, et al. Progress towards patient-specific computational flow modeling of the left heart via combination of magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003; 31: 42-52.
42. Kilner PJ, Yang GZ, Wilkes AJ, Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Yacoub MH. Asymmetric redirection of flow through the heart. Nature. 2000; 404: 759-761.
43. Olesen SP, Clapham DE, Davies PF. Haemodynamic shear stress activates a K+ current in vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988; 331: 168-170.
44. Davies PF, Remuzzi A, Gordon EJ, Dewey CF Jr, Gimbrone MA. Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83: 2114-2117.
45. Fry DL. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res. 1968; 22: 165-197.
46. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 6 Cardiac morphology and flow patterns: structuralfunctional correlations, p. 298-322.
47. Manabe I, Shindo T, Nagai R. Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 1103-1113.
48. Janmey PA, Weitz DA. Dealing with mechanics: mechanisms of force transduction in cells. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004; 29: 364-370.
49. Pasipoularides A. Heart's Vortex. op. cit. See, particularly, Chapter 1. Introduction, p. 2-34, and Chapter 7. Cardiac cycle and central pressure, flow, and volume pulses, p. 323-407.
50. ibid. See, particularly, Chapter 15. Fluid dynamic epigenetic factors in cardiogenesis and remodeling, p. 808-850, and Chapter 16. A recapitulation with clinical and basic science perspectives, p. 851-888.
51. Groenendijk BCW, Van der Heiden K, Hierck BP, Poelmann RE. The role of shear stress on ET-1, KLF2, and NOS-3 expression in the developing cardiovascular system of chicken embryos in a venous ligation model. Physiology (Bethesda). 2007; 22: 380-389.
52. Hove JR, Köster RW, Forouhar AS, Acevedo-Bolton G, Fraser SE, Gharib M. Intracardiac fluid forces are an essential epigenetic factor for embryonic cardiogenesis. Nature. 2003; 421: 172-177.
53. Holtzman NG, Schoenebeck JJ, Tsai HJ, Yelon D. Endocardium is necessary for cardiomyocyte movement during heart tube assembly. Development. 2007; 134: 2379-2386.
54. Love AC. Functional homology and homology of function: biological concepts and philosophical consequences. Biol Philos. 2007; 22: 691-708.
55. Li K, Rouleau JL, Andries LJ, Brutsaert DL. Effect of dysfunctional vascular endothelium on myocardial performance in isolated papillary muscles. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 768-777.
56. Yurchenco PD. Basement membranes: cell scaffoldings and signaling platforms. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011; 3: doi:10.101/cshperspect.a004911.
57. Deroanne CF, Lapiere CM, Nusgens BV. In vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial cells by relaxation of the coupling extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 49: 647-658.
58. Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science. 2009; 326: 1216-1219.
59. Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011; 475: 316-323.
60. Schwartz MA. Integrins and extracellular matrix in mecha-notransduction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010; 2: a005066.
61. Berrier AL, Yamada KM. Cell-matrix adhesion. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 213: 565-573.
62. Choquet D, Felsenfeld DP, Sheetz MP. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell. 1997; 88: 39-48.
63. Qin Z, Buehler MJ, Kreplak L. A multi-scale approach to understand the mechanobiology of intermediate filaments. J Biomech. 2010; 43: 15-22.
64. Ingber DE. Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems biology. J Cell Sci. 2003; 116: 1157-1173.
65. Soares e Silva M, Depken M, et al. Active multistage coarsening of actin networks driven by myosin motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 9408-9413.
66. Vale RD. The molecular motor toolbox for intracellular transport. Cell. 2003; 112: 467-480.
67. Geiger B, Bershadsky A. Exploring the neighborhood: adhesion-coupled cell mechanosensors. Cell. 2002; 110: 139-142.
68. Koenderink GH, Dogic Z, Nakamura F, et al. An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 15192-15197.
69. Wen Q, Janmey PA. Polymer physics of the cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2011; 15: 177-182.
70. Brakemeier S, Eichler I, Hopp H, Köhler R, Hoyer J. Upregulation of endothelial stretch-activated cation channels by fluid shear stress. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 209-218.
71. Bray MA, Sheehy SP, Parker KK. Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2008; 65: 641-651.
72. Davies PF. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev. 1995; 75: 519-560.
73. Tamada M, Sheetz MP, Sawada Y. Activation of a signaling cascade by cytoskeleton stretch. Dev Cell. 2004; 7: 709-718.
74. Vogel V. Mechanotransduction involving multimodular proteins: converting force into biochemical signals. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006; 35: 459-488.
75. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 265-275.
76. Wang N, Butler JP, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction across the cell surface and through the cytoskeleton. Science. 1993; 260: 1124-1127.
77. Kim SA, Tai CY, Mok LP, Mosser EA, Schuman EM. Calcium-dependent dynamics of cadherin interactions at cell-cell junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108: 9857-9862.
78. Calderwood DA. Integrin activation. J Cell Sci. 2004; 117: 657-666.
79. Tarbell JM, Pahakis MY. Mechanotransduction and the glycocalyx. J Intern Med. 2006; 259: 339-350.
80. Critchley DR. Cytoskeletal proteins talin and vinculin in integrin-mediated adhesion. Biochem Soc Trans. 2004; 32: 831-836.
81. Morgan MR, Humphries MJ, Bass MD. Synergistic control of cell adhesion by integrins and syndecans. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 957-969.
82. Sastry SK, Burridge K. Focal adhesions: a nexus for intracellular signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics. Exp Cell Res. 2000; 261: 25-36.
83. Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009; 10: 75-82.
84. Webster M, Witkin KL, Cohen-Fix O. Sizing up the nucleus: nuclear shape, size and nuclear-envelope assembly. J Cell Sci. 2009; 122: 1477-1486.
85. Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJ, Lammerding J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1307-1318.
86. Orr AW, Helmke BP, Blackman BR, Schwartz MA. Mechanisms of mechanotransduction. Dev Cell. 2006; 10: 11-20.
87. De R, Zemel A, Safran SA. Do cells sense stress or strain? Measurement of cellular orientation can provide a clue. Biophys J. 2008; 94: L29-31.
88. Ohno M, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ, Cooke JP. Shear stress elevates endothelial cGMP. Role of a potassium channel and G protein coupling. Circulation. 1993; 88: 193-197.
89. Dzau VJ. Transcription factor decoy. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 1234-1236.
90. Zlatanova J, Leuba SH. Stretching and imaging single DNA molecules and chromatin. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2002; 23: 377-395.
91. Marko JF, Poirier MG. Micromechanics of chromatin and chromosomes. Biochem Cell Biol. 2003; 81: 209-220.
92. Trinkle-Mulcahy L, Lamond AI. Toward a high-resolution view of nuclear dynamics. Science. 2007; 318: 1402-1407.
93. Knudsen HL, Frangos JA. Role of cytoskeleton in shear stressinduced endothelial nitric oxide production. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273 (1 Pt 2): H347-55.
94. Visa N. Actin in transcription. Actin is required for transcription by all three RNA polymerases in the eukaryotic cell nucleus. EMBO Rep. 2005; 6: 218-219.
95. Mirotsou M, Dzau VJ, Pratt RE, Weinberg EO. Physiological genomics of cardiac disease: quantitative relationships between gene expression and left ventricular hypertrophy. Physiol Genomics. 2006; 27: 86-94.
96. Creemers EE, Pinto YM. Molecular mechanisms that control interstitial fibrosis in the pressure-overloaded heart. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 89: 265-272.
97. Pasipoularides A. Complementarity and competitiveness of the intrinsic and extrinsic components of the total ventricular load: demonstration after valve replacement in aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 2007; 153: 4-6.
98. Pasipoularides AD, Shu M, Shah A, Glower DD. Right ventricular diastolic relaxation in conscious dog models of pressure overload, volume overload, and ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 124: 964-972.
99. Pasipoularides A, Shu M, Shah A, Silvestry S, Glower DD. Right ventricular diastolic function in canine models of pressure overload, volume overload, and ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 283: H2140-2150.
100. Mirsky I, Pasipoularides A. Clinical assessment of diastolic function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1990; 32: 291-318.
101. Pasipoularides A, Mirsky I, Hess OM, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Myocardial relaxation and passive diastolic properties in man. Circulation. 1986; 74: 991-1001.
102. Mirsky I, Pasipoularides A. Elastic properties of normal and hypertrophied cardiac muscle. Fed Proc. 1980; 39: 156-161.
103. Nauli SM, Kawanabe Y, Kaminski JJ, Pearce WJ, Ingber DE, Zhou J. Endothelial cilia are fluid shear sensors that regulate calcium signaling and nitric oxide production through polycystin-1. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1161-1171.
104. Boo YC, Jo H. Flow-dependent regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase: role of protein kinases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2003; 285: C499-508.
105. Bellin RM, Kubicek JD, Frigault MJ, et al. Defining the role of syndecan-4 in mechanotransduction using surface-modification approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106: 22102-22107.
106. Li C, Hu Y, Mayr M, Xu Q. Cyclic strain stress-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase 1 expression in vascular smooth muscle cells is regulated by Ras/Rac-MAPK pathways. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 25273-25280.
107. Kyriakis JM, Banerjee P, Nikolakaki E, et al. The stress-activated protein kinase subfamily of c-Jun kinases. Nature. 1994; 369: 156-160.
108. Davis RJ. The mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 14553-14556.
109. Griffith LG, Swartz MA. Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006; 7: 211-224.
110. Helmke BP. Molecular control of cytoskeletal mechanics by hemodynamic forces. Physiology (Bethesda). 2005; 20: 43-53.
111. Goodsell DS. The molecular perspective: cadherin. Oncologist. 2002; 7: 467-468.
112. Faust U, Hampe N, Rubner W, et al. Cyclic stress at mHz frequencies aligns fibroblasts in direction of zero strain. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e28963.
113. De R, Zemel A, Safran SA. Dynamics of cell orientation. Nat Phys. 2007; 3: 655-659.
114. Zhang J, Friedman MH. Adaptive response of vascular endothelial cells to an acute increase in shear stress magnitude. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012; 302: H983-991.
115. Li YS, Haga JH, Chien S. Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells. J Biomech. 2005; 38: 1949-1971.
116. Garcia-Cardeña G, Comander J, Anderson KR, Blackman BR, Gimbrone MA Jr. Biomechanical activation of vascular endothelium as a determinant of its functional phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 4478-4485.
117. Silberman M, Barac YD, Yahav H, et al. Shear stress-induced transcriptional regulation via hybrid promoters as a potential tool for promoting angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2009; 12: 231-242.
118. Liew CC, Dzau VJ. Molecular genetics and genomics of heart failure. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5: 811-825.
119. Haqqani AS, Kelly JF, Stanimirovic DB. Quantitative protein profiling by mass spectrometry using label-free proteomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 439: 241-256.