Erratum to Blame the Opponent! Effects of Multimodal Discrediting Moves in Public Debates (Cogn Comput, 10.1007/s12559-012-9175-y);Blame the Opponent! Effects of Multimodal Discrediting Moves in Public Debates

Cognitive Computation

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 460-476

  D'Errico, Francesca ^a   Poggi, Isabella ^a  

^a ROMA TRE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Discredits; Emotions; Social signals

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

DISCREDITING MOVES; DISCREDITS; EMOTIONS; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; POLITICAL DEBATES; PROSODIC FEATURES; SOCIAL SIGNALS; THREE DIMENSIONS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84870398900     PISSN: 18669956     EISSN: 18669964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12559-012-9190-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (61)

1. Pentland A. Honest signals. How do they shape our world. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2008.
2. Aristotle. On Rhetoric: a theory of civic discourse. 2nd ed. (trans: GA Kennedy). New York, Oxford University; 2007.
3. Poggi I. The goals of persuasion. Pragmat Cognit. 2005; 13(2): 297-336.
4. Poggi I, D'Errico F, Vincze L. Discrediting moves in political debates. In: Ricci F, et al. editors. Proceedings of second international workshop on user models for motivational systems: the affective and the rational routes to persuasion (UMMS 2011- Girona). Springer LNCS; 2011; p. 84-99.
5. D'Errico F, Poggi I, Vincze L. Discrediting signals. A model of social evaluation to study discrediting moves in political debates. J Multimodal User Interf (Special issue in Social signal processing). 2012. doi: 10. 1007/s12193-012-0098-4.
6. D'Errico F, Poggi I, Discrediting body. A multimodal strategy to spoil the other's image. In: Proceedings of political speech, Springer, LNAI, forthcoming.
7. Friedenberg RV. Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates, 1960-1992.
8. Uvehammer, M. The impact of linguistic strategies in political debate. A linguistic discourse analysis of the first Bush and Kerry Presidential Debate, 2004. (& http://hv. diva-portal. org/smash/get/diva2: 216059/FULLTEXT01>).
9. Heritage J, Greatbatch D. Generating applause: a study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. Am J Sociol. 1986; 92(1): 110-57.
10. Guerini M, Strapparava C, Stock O. CORPS: a corpus of tagged political speeches for persuasive communication processing. J Inf Technol Polit. 2008; 5(1): 19-32.
11. Arroyo JLB. Interpersonal issues in political discourse. In: Locher MA, editor. Interpersonal pragmatics. Germany: De Gruyter; 2010. p. 405-34.
12. Seiter JS, Weger H Jr, Kinzer HJ, Jensen AS. Impression management in televised debates: the effect of background nonverbal behavior on audience perceptions of debaters' likeability. Commun Res Rep. 2006; 26(1): 1-11.
13. Jamieson KH. Dirty politics. Oxford: Oxford University press; 1992.
14. Luginbühl M. Conversational violence in political TV debates: Forms and functions. J Pragmat. 2007; 39: 1371-87.
15. Smith C, Voth B. The role of humor in political argument: how 'strategery' and 'lockboxes' changed a political campaign. Argument Adv. 2002; 39: 110-29.
16. Rockwell P. Lower, slower, louder: vocal cues of sarcasm. J Psycholinguist Res. 2000; 29(5): 483-95.
17. Woods J, Walton D. Argument: the logic of the fallacies. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson; 1982.
18. Walton DN. Types of dialogue, dialectical shifts and fallacies. In: van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Blair JA, Willard CA, editors. Argumentation illuminated. Amsterdam: SICSAT; 1992. p. 133-47.
19. Walton DN. Ad Hominem arguments. Studies in rhetoric and communication. Alabama: University of Alabama Press; 1998.
20. van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1992.
21. Hovland CI, Weiss W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Publ Opin Q. 1951; 15: 635-50.
22. Rosenberg A, Hirschberg J. Charisma perception from text and speech. Speech Commun. 2009; 51: 640-55.
23. Weiner B. An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer; 1986.
24. Seligman CR, Tucker GR, Lambert WE. The effects of speech style and other attributes on teachers' attitudes toward pupils. Lang Soc. 1972; 1: 131-42.
25. Peeters G. The positive-negative asymmetry: on cognitive consistency and positivity bias. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1971; 1(4): 455-74.
26. Catellani P. Attacco e difesa nella comunicazione massmediale. In: Catellani P, Sensales G, editors. Psicologia della politica. Bologna: Il mulino; 2011. p. 97-112.
27. Entman R, Framing M. Towards a clarification of a fractured theory. J Commun. 1993; 43(4): 51-8.
28. Mazzoleni P. La Comunicazione Politica, Bologna, Il Mulino; 2004.
29. Fiske ST, Cuddy AJC, Glick P, Xu J. A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002; 82: 878-902.
30. Ekvall G. The organizational culture of idea-management: A creative climate for the management of ideas. In: Henry J, Walker D, editors. Managing innovation. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1991. p. 73-9.
31. Leach CW, Ellemers N, Barreto M. Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 93: 234-49.
32. Castelli L, Carraro L, Ghitti C, Pastore M. The effects of perceived competence and sociability on electoral outcomes. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009; 45: 1152-5.
33. Catellani P, Bertolotti M. Leadership attacks versus morality attacks: their effects on the evaluation of politicians. In: Oral presentation at "XVI General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology", Stoccolma, 12-16 luglio, 2011.
34. Bosmajian HA. The rhetoric of nonverbal communication: Readings., ed. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, 1971.
35. Atkinson JM. Our masters' voice. London: Routledge; 1984.
36. Ekman P, Friesen WV. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior. Semiotica. 1969; 1: 49-98.
37. McNeill D. Hand and mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1992.
38. Burgoon JK, Birk T, Pfau M. Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Hum Commun Res. 1990; 17: 140-69.
39. Butterworth B, Beattie G. Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In: Campbell RN, Smith PT, editors. Recent advances in the psychology of language: formal and experimental approaches. New York: Plenum; 1978.
40. Maricchiolo F, Gnisci A, Bonaiuto M, Ficca G. Effects of difference types of hand gestures in persuasive speech on receivers' evaluations. Lang Cogn Proc. 2009; 24: 239-66.
41. Calbris G. L'Expression Gestuelle de la Pensée d'un Homme Politique. Paris: Éditions du CNRS; 2003.
42. Kendon A. Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
43. Streeck J. Gesture in Political Communication. A case study of the democratic presidential candidates during the 2004 primary campaign. Lang Social Interact. 2007; 41(1): 154-86.
44. Quintilianus MF Institutiones Oratoriae. Translation by HE Butler, The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian (The Loeb Classical Library). New York: Putnam and Sons; 1992.
45. Poggi I, Pelachaud C. Persuasion and the expressivity of gestures in humans and machines. In: Wachsmuth I, Lenzen M, Knoblich G, editors. Embodied communication in humans and machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 391-424.
46. Poggi I, Vincze L. Gesture, gaze and persuasive strategies in political discourse. Multimodal Corpora. 2009. p. 73-92.
47. Ekman P. About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In: von Cranach M, Foppa K, Lepenies W, Ploog D, editors. Human ethology: claims and limits of a new discipline: contributions to the Colloquium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979. p. 169-248.
48. McHugo GJ, Lanzetta JT, Sullivan DG, Masters RD, Englis BG. Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays. J Person Soc Psychol. 1985; 49(6): 1513-29.
49. Attardo S, Eisterhold J, Hay J, Poggi I. Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm humor. Int J Humor Res. 2003; 16(2): 243-60.
50. Poggi I, Cavicchio F, Magno Caldognetto E. Irony in judicial debates: analyzing the subtleties of irony while testing the subtleties of an annotation scheme. J Lang Res Eval. 2007; 41(3-4): 215-32.
51. Conte R, Castelfranchi C. Cognitive and social action. London: University College; 1995.
52. Miceli M, Castelfranchi C. The role of evaluation in cognition and social interaction. In: Dautenhahn K, editor. Human cognition and agent technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1998.
53. Castelfranchi C. Che figura. Emozioni e immagine sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino; 1988.
54. Poggi I, editor. La Mente del Cuore. Armando: Roma; 2008.
55. Poggi I, D'Errico F. Dominance in political debates. In: Salah AA, Gevers T, Sebe N, Vinciarelli A, editors. HBU 2010, LNCS 6219. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 163-174.
56. Castelfranchi C. Micro-macro constitution of power, protosociology. Int J Interdiscip Res. 2003; 18-19: 208-65.
57. Austin JL. How to do things with words. London: Clarendon Press; 1962.
58. Jonasson, J. The centenarian who climbed out the window and disappeared. Carl's Books; 2010.
59. Poggi I. Mind, hands, face and body. A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag; 2007.
60. Müller C. Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: a case of a gesture family? In: Müller C, Posner R, editors. The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. Berlin: Weidler; 2004.
61. Poggi I. Irony, humour ad ridicule. Power, image and judicial rhetoric in an Italian political trial. In: Vion R, Giacomi A, Vargas C, editors. La corporalité du langage: Multimodalité, discours et écriture, Hommage à Claire Maury-Rouan. Aix en Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence; 2011.