Agenda-setting in the Common Security and Defence Policy: An institutionalist perspective

Cooperation and Conflict

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 454-472

  Dijkstra, Hylke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agenda setting; CSDP; European Union; institutionalism; Javier Solana

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870396584     PISSN: 00108367     EISSN: 14603691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010836712462772     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Accord (2008) Delivering peace for Aceh: an interview with President Martti Ahtisaari. Available at: www.c-r.org/accord-article/delivering-peace-aceh-interview-president-martti-ahtisaari (accessed 16 July 2012).
2. Darfur to top agenda for French FM Kouchner.Agence France-Presse. 2007;:.
3. Albright M.The right balance will secure NATO's future.Financial Times. 1998;:.
4. Bachrach P,Baratz M.The two faces of power.American Political Science Review. 1962;56 (4): 947-952.
5. Barnett M,Finnemore M.The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations.International Organization. 1999;53 (4): 699-732.
6. Barnett M,Finnemore MRules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2004:.
7. Baumgartner F,Jones B.Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems.Journal of Politics. 1991;53 (4): 1044-1074.
8. Beach D.The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: the role and influence of the council secretariat.Journal of European Public Policy. 2004;11 (3): 408-439.
9. Beach DThe Dynamics of European Integration: Why and When EU Institutions Matter. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:.
10. Berg PThe EU as a Strategic Actor in the Realm of Security and Defence. Asseburg MKempin R, ed. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik; 2009:57-69.
11. Bertin TThe European Security and Defence Policy: An Implementation Perspective. Merlingen MOstrauskaite R, ed. London: Routledge; 2008:61-77.
12. Managers of Global Change The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Biermann FSiebenhüner B, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press; 2009:.
13. Cameron FAn Introduction to European Foreign Policy. London: Routledge; 2007:.
14. Cascone GThe European Security and Defence Policy: An Implementation Perspective. Merlingen MOstrauskaite R, ed. London: Routledge; 2008:143-158.
15. Secretary or General? The UN Secretary-General in World Politics. Chesterman S, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:.
16. Christiansen T.Out of the shadows: the general secretariat of the Council of Ministers.Journal of Legislative Studies. 2002;8 (4): 80-97.
17. Christiansen T,Vanhoonacker S.At a critical juncture? Change and continuity in the institutional development of the council secretariat.West European Politics. 2008;31 (4): 751-770.
18. Cobb R,Ross JK,Ross M.Agenda building as a comparative political process.American Political Science Review. 1976;70 (1): 126-138.
19. Presidency conclusions. 2003;:.
20. Presidency conclusions. 2005;:.
21. Joint Action on the establishment of an EU Planning Team (EUPT Kosovo) regarding a possible EU crisis management operation in the field of rule of law and possible other areas in Kosovo, 2006/304/CFSP. 2006;:.
22. Dijkstra H.The Council Secretariat's role in the common foreign and security policy.European Foreign Affairs Review. 2008;13 (2): 149-166.
23. Dijkstra H.Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making.Journal of European Public Policy. 2010a;17 (4): 527-544.
24. Dijkstra H.The military operation of the EU in Chad and the Central African Republic: good policy, bad politics.International Peacekeeping. 2010b;17 (3): 395-407.
25. Dijkstra H.The planning and implementation of the rule of law mission of the European Union in Kosovo.Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 2011;5 (2): 193-210.
26. Dijkstra H.The influence of EU Officials in European security and defence.European Security. 2012;:.
27. Presidency conclusions. 2002;:.
28. US blocks early EU takeover of SFOR.European Security Review. 2003;18: 9.:.
29. US puts off EU takeover of Bosnia mission.Financial Times. 2003;:.
30. Relief work may aid peace moves in conflict areas.Financial Times. 2004;:.
31. Aceh peace talks agree August target date for deal.Financial Times. 2005;:.
32. Giegerich B,Pushkina D,Mount A.Towards a strategic partnership? The US and Russian response to the European security and defence policy.Security Dialogue. 2006;37 (3): 385-407.
33. Gowan R.The case of the missing battlegroups: is EU-UN military cooperation in decline?.Studia Diplomatica: The Brussels Journal of International Relations. 2009;62 (3): 53-60.
34. Grevi GThe EU Mission in Aceh: Implementing Peace. Braud PGrevi G, ed. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies; 2005:21-36.
35. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Hawkins DLake DNielson DTierney M, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
36. Hendrickson RDiplomacy and War at NATO: The Secretary General and Military Action after the Cold War. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press; 2006:.
37. HerrbergA (2008) The Brussels "backstage" of the Aceh peace process. In: AguswandiLargeJ (eds) Reconfiguring Politics: The Indonesia - Aceh Peace Process (Accord). Available at: www.c-r.org/accord-article/brussels-backstage-aceh-peace-process (accessed 16 July 2011).
38. Hill C.The capability-expectations gap or conceptualizing Europe's international role.Journal of Common Market Studies. 1993;31 (3): 305-328.
39. Howorth J.Decision-making in security and defence policy: towards supranational intergovernmentalism?.Cooperation and Conflict. 2012;47 (4):.
40. Chad: a new conflict resolution framework. Brussels: International Crisis Group; 2008:.
41. Jakarta is upbeat on Aceh peace; Both sides maneuver around critical issue.International Herald Tribune. 2005;:.
42. Jordan RPolitical Leadership in NATO: A Study in Multinational Diplomacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1979:.
43. Kingdon JAgendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co; 1984:.
44. Leakey DSecuring Europe? Implementing the European Security Strategy. Deighton AMaurer V, ed. Zürich: Swiss Federal Institute for Technology; 2006:59-68.
45. Mace C.Operation concordia: developing a 'European' approach to crisis management?.International Peacekeeping. 2004;11 (3): 474-490.
46. Regulating Europe. Majone G, ed. London: Routledge; 1996:.
47. Manners I.Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2002;40 (2): 235-258.
48. Mattelaer AThe strategic planning of EU military operations - the case of EUFOR Tchad/RCA. Brussels: Institute for European Studies; 2008:.
49. Mérand F,Hofmann S,Irondelle B.Transgovernmental networks in the European security and defense policy.European Integration Online Papers: EIOP. 2010;14:1-19.
50. Mérand F,Hofmann S,Irondelle B.Governance and state power: a network analysis of European security.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2011;49 (1): 121-147.
51. Merikallio KMaking Peace: Ahtisaari and Aceh. Helsinki: WSOY; 2008:.
52. Peters GEuropean Union: Power and Policy-Making. Richardson J, ed. London: Routledge; 2001:77-94.
53. Pollack M.Delegation, agency, and agenda-setting in the European Community.International Organization. 1997;51 (1): 99-134.
54. Pollack MThe Engines of European Integration: Agency, Delegation, and Agenda Setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003:.
55. Princen S.Agenda-setting in the European Union: a theoretical exploration and agenda for research.Journal of European Public Policy. 2007;14 (1): 21-38.
56. Princen SAgenda-Setting in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2009:.
57. Princen S.Agenda-setting strategies in EU Policy processes.Journal of European Public Policy. 2011;18 (7): 927-943.
58. Princen S,Rhinard M.Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union.Journal of European Public Policy. 2006;13 (7): 1119-1132.
59. Reichard MThe EU-NATO Relationship: A Legal and Political Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006:.
60. RobertsonGPapandreouGSolanaJ (2003) Press conference following the NATO-EU meeting in Madrid, 3 June. Available at: http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2003/s030603i.htm (accessed 16 July 2012).
61. Schattschneider EThe Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1960:.
62. Solana J,Rehn O.Summary note on the joint report by Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the CFSP, and Olli Rehn, EU Commissioner for Enlargement, on the future EU Role and Contribution in Kosovo, S412/05. 2005;:.
63. Tallberg J.The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency.Journal of European Public Policy. 2003;10 (1): 1-19.
64. Tallberg JLeadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
65. Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo, S/2004/348. 2004;:.
66. Report of the Secretary-General on Chad and the Central African Republic, S/2007/488.
67. Vanhoonacker S,Pomorska K.The European external action service and agenda-setting in European foreign policy.Journal of European Public Policy. 20:.
68. Vanhoonacker S,Dijkstra H,Maurer H.Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy: the state of the art.European Integration Online Papers: EIOP. 2010;14 (1): 1-33.
69. Waltz KTheory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979:.
70. Woodbridge J.Ready and willing to take charge in the Balkans?.European Security Review. 2002;14:3-4.