The influence of EU officials in European Security and Defence

European Security

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 311-327

  Dijkstra, Hylke ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CSDP; EU officials; European Union; influence; rational choice institutionalism; security policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870396321     PISSN: 09662839     EISSN: 17461545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2012.667805     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Accord, 2008. Delivering peace for Aceh: an interview with President Martti Ahtisaari. Available from: http://www.c-r.org/our-work/accord/aceh/ahtisaari.php [Accessed 8 February 2012].
2. Arrow, K., 1985. “ The economics of agency ”. In Principals and agents: the structure of business, Edited by: Pratt, J., and Zechhauser, R., 37–54. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3. Baumgartner, F., and Jones, B., 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of politics, 53 (4): 1044–1074.
4. Beach, D., 2005. The dynamics of European integration: why and when EU institutions matter, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
5. Bendor, J., Taylor, S., and Van Gaalen, R., 1985. Bureaucratic expertise versus legislative authority: a model of deception and monitoring in budgeting. American political science review, 79 (4): 1041–1060.
6. Benner, T., and Bossong, R., 2010. The case for a public administration turn in the study of EU civilian crisis management. Journal of European public policy, 17 (7): 1074–1086.
7. Berg, P., 2009. “ EUFOR Tchad/RCA: the EU serving French interests ”. In The EU as a strategic actor in the realm of security and defence, Edited by: Asseburg, M., and Kempin, R., 57–69. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
8. Bertin, T., 2008. “ The EU military operation in Bosnia ”. In The European security and defence policy: an implementation perspective, Edited by: Merlingen, M., and Ostrauskaite, R., 61–77. London: Routledge.
9. Bicchi, F., 2012. The European External Action Service: a pivotal actor in EU foreign policy communications?. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7 (1): 81–94.
10. Biermann, F., and Siebenhüner, B., 2009. Managers of global change: the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT University Press.
11. Bradley, C., and Kelley, J., 2008. The concept of international delegation. Law and contemporary problems, 71 (1): 1–36.
12. Christiansen, T., 2002. Out of the shadows: the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers. Journal of legislative studies, 8 (4): 80–97.
13. Christiansen, T., and Vanhoonacker, S., 2008. At a critical juncture? Change and continuity in the institutional development of the Council Secretariat. West European politics, 31 (4): 751–770.
14. Council, 2003. Presidency conclusions. 24 February.
15. Council, 2004. Joint Action on the European Union military operation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2004/570/CFSP, 12 July.
16. Cross, M., 2010. Cooperation by committee: the EU military committee and the committee for civilian crisis management. Occasional Paper 82, Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
17. Dahl, R., 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral science, 2: 201–215.
18. Dahl, R., [1963] 2003. Modern political analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
19. Dijkstra, H., 2008. The Council Secretariat's role in the common foreign and security policy. European foreign affairs review, 13 (2): 149–166.
20. Dijkstra, H., 2009. Commission versus Council Secretariat: an analysis of bureaucratic rivalry in European foreign policy. European foreign affairs review, 14 (3): 431–450.
21. Dijkstra, H., 2010a. Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making. Journal of European public policy, 17 (4): 527–544.
22. Dijkstra, H., 2010b. The military operation of the EU in Chad and the Central African Republic: good policy, bad politics. International peacekeeping, 17 (3): 395–407.
23. Dijkstra, H., 2011a. EU external representation in conflict resolution: when does the Presidency or the High Representative speak for Europe?. European integration online papers (EIoP), 15 (1): 1–23.
24. Dijkstra, H., 2011b. The planning and implementation of the rule of law mission of the European Union in Kosovo. Journal of intervention and statebuilding, 5 (2): 193–210.
25. Dijkstra, H., and Vanhoonacker, S., 2011. The changing politics of information in European foreign policy. Journal of European integration, 33 (5): 541–558.
26. Financial Times, 2003. US puts off EU takeover of Bosnia mission, 4 June.
27. Giegerich, B., Pushkina, D., and Mount, A., 2006. Towards a strategic partnership? The US and Russian response to the European security and defence policy. Security dialogue, 37 (3): 385–407.
28. Grevi, G., 2005. “ The Aceh monitoring mission: towards integrated crisis management ”. In The EU mission in Aceh: implementing peace. Chaillot Paper 61, Edited by: Braud, P., and Grevi, G., 21–36. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
29. Grevi, G., 2009. “ EULEX Kosovo: the EU rule-of-law mission in Kosovo (EULEX Kosovo) ”. In European security and defence policy: the first 10 years (1999–2009), Edited by: Grevi, G., Helly, D., and Keohane, D., 353–368. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
30. Haas, P., 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International organization, 46 (1): 1–35.
31. Hayes-Renshaw, F., and Wallace, H., 2006. The Council of Ministers, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
32. Hawkins, D., et al., 2006. Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
33. Hoffmann, S., 1966. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95 (3): 862–915.
34. Impetus, 2010. Interview with DGEUMS–LT Gen Leakey, 9 Spring/Summer.
35. Juncos, A., and Pomorska, K., 2010. Secretariat, facilitator or policy entrepreneur? Role perceptions of officials of the Council Secretariat. In: S., Vanhoonacker, H., Dijkstra and H., Maurer, Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 14, Special Issue 1, 1–26.
36. Juncos, A., and Pomorska, K., 2011. Invisible and unaccountable? National representatives and Council officials in EU foreign policy. Journal of European public policy, 18 (8): 1096–1114.
37. Kirwan, P., 2008. “ From European to global security actor: the Aceh monitoring mission in Indonesia ”. In European security and defence policy: an implementation perspective, Edited by: Merlingen, M., and Ostrauskaite, R., 128–142. London: Routledge.
38. Klein, N., 2010. European agents out of control: delegation and agency in the civil-military crisis management of the European Union (1999–2008), Baden Baden: Nomos.
39. Lake, D., and McCubbins, M., 2006. “ The logic of delegation to international organizations ”. In Delegation and agency in international organizations, Edited by: Hawkins, D., 341–368. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Leakey, D., 2006. “ ESDP and civil/military cooperation: Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005 ”. In Securing Europe? Implementing the European security strategy, Edited by: Deighton, A., and Maurer, V., 59–68. Zürich: Swiss Federal Institute for Technology.
41. Mattelaer, A., 2008. The strategic planning of EU military operations: The case of EUFOR Tchad/RCA. IES Working Papers, 5, Brussels: Institute for European Studies.
42. Mattelaer, A., 2010. The CSDP mission planning process of the European Union: innovations and shortfalls. In: S., Vanhoonacker, H., Dijkstra and H., Maurer, Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 14, Special Issue 1, 1–18.
43. Mérand, F., Hofmann, S., and Irondelle, B., 2010. Transgovernmental networks in the European security and defense policy. In: S., Vanhoonacker, H., Dijkstra and H., Maurer, Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 14, Special Issue 1, 1–19.
44. Mérand, F., Hofmann, S., and Irondelle, B., 2011. Governance and state power: a network analysis of European security. Journal of common market studies, 49 (1): 121–147.
45. Merikallio, K., 2008. Making peace: Ahtisaari and Aceh, Helsinki: WSOY.
46. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G., and Rüger, C., 2011. The high representative for the EU foreign and security policy: review and prospects. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
47. Nielson, D., and Tierney, M., 2003. Delegation to international organizations: agency theory and world bank environmental reform. International organization, 57 (2): 241–276.
48. Nuttall, S., 1992. European political cooperation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Nuttall, S., 2000. European foreign policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Oxfam, 2008. Mission incomplete: why civilians remain at risk in Eastern Chad. Oxfam Briefing paper, 119, Oxfam.
51. Peters, G., 2001. “ Agenda-setting in the European Union ”. In European Union: power and policy-making, Edited by: Richardson, J., London: Routledge.
52. Peterson, J., 1995. Decision-making in the European Union: toward a framework for analysis. Journal of European public policy, 2 (1): 69–93.
53. Pollack, M., 2003. The engines of European integration: agency, delegation, and agenda setting in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Princen, S., 2007. Agenda-setting in the European Union: a theoretical exploration and agenda for research. Journal of European public policy, 14 (1): 21–38.
55. Princen, S., and Rhinard, M., 2006. Crashing and creeping: agenda-setting dynamics in the European Union. Journal of European public policy, 13 (7): 1119–1132.
56. Schulze, K., 2007. Mission not so impossible: the AMM and the transition from conflict to peace in Aceh (2005–2006). RSIS working papers, 131, Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.
57. Smith, M., 2004. Europe's foreign and security policy: the institutionalization of cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Solana, J., 2004. Summary of the report by Javier Solana, EU High Representative for CFSP, on a Possible EU Deployment in BiH Presented to the EU Council of Foreign Ministers, 23 February. Available from: http://www.ohr.int/other-doc/eu-stmnt/default.asp?content_id=31930 [Accessed 8 February 2012].
59. Solana, J., and Rehn, O., 2005a. Summary note on the Joint Report on the future EU Role and Contribution in Kosovo, 14 June.
60. Solana, J., and Rehn, O., 2005b. Summary note on the Joint Report on the future EU Role and Contribution in Kosovo, 9 December.
61. Tallberg, J., 2003. The agenda-shaping powers of the EU Council Presidency. Journal of European public policy, 10 (1): 1–19.
62. Tallberg, J., 2006. Leadership and negotiation in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Thatcher, M., and Stone Sweet, A., 2002. Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West European politics, 25 (1): 1–22.
64. Trondal, J., 2006. Governing at the frontier of the European Commission: the case of seconded national experts. West European politics, 29 (1): 147–160.
65. United Nations, 2007. Report of the Secretary-General on Chad and the Central African Republic, S/2007/488, 10 August.
66. Vanhoonacker, S., Dijkstra, H., and Maurer, H., 2010. Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy: the state of the art. In: S., Vanhoonacker, H., Dijkstra and H., Maurer, Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 14, Special Issue 1, 1–33.
67. Vanhoonacker, S., and Jacobs, A., 2010. ESDP and institutional change: the case of Belgium. Security dialogue, 41 (5): 559–581.
68. Wall, J., and Lynn, A., 1993. Mediation: a current review. Journal of conflict resolution, 37 (1): 160–194.
69. Westlake, M., and Galloway, D., 2006. The Council of the European Union. London: John Harper.