A consensus based group decision making methodology for strategic selection problems of supply chain coordination

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 122-134

  Singh, R K ^a   Benyoucef, Lyes ^b  

^a BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIV   (France)

Author keywords

CCSD method; Fuzzy logic; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Group decision making; Neat OWA operator; Supply chain coordination

Indexed keywords

CCSD METHOD; FUZZY TOPSIS; GROUP DECISION MAKING; OWA OPERATORS; SUPPLY CHAIN COORDINATION;

DECISION MAKING; FUZZY LOGIC;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84870063156     PISSN: 09521976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.03.013     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. S. Alonso, E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Chiclana, and F. Herrera A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences Inf. Sci. 180 2010 4477 4495
2. K. Arshinder, A. Kanda, and S.G. Deshmukh Supply chain coordination: perspectives, empirical studies and research directions Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115 2 2008 316 335
3. Y. Aviv The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance Manage. Sci. 47 10 2001 1326 1343
4. C.L.E. Barron Optimizing inventory decisions in a multi stage multi customer supply chain: a note Transp. Res. Part E 43 5 2007 647 654
5. F.F. Boctor, G. Laporte, and J. Renand Models and algorithms for the dynamic joint replenishment problem Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 13 2004 2667 2678
6. G. Bordogna, M. Fedrizzi, and G. Pasi A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators IEEE Trans. Syst.; Man and Cyber. A 27 1997 126 132
7. T. Boyaci, and G. Gallego Coordinating pricing and inventory replenishment policies for one wholesaler and one or more geographically dispersed retailers Int. J. Prod. Econ. 77 2 2002 95 111
8. N. Bryson Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content Comp. Operat. Res. 23 1996 27 35
9. F.J. Cabrerizo, J.M. Moreno, I.J. Pérez, and E. Herrera-Viedma Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks Soft Comput. 14 2010 451 463
10. V. Calabuig, and G. Olcina Cooperation and cultural transmission in a coordination game J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72 1 2009 188 201
11. T.N. Cason, A.C. Savikhin, and R.M. Sheremeta Behavioral spillovers in coordination games Eur. Econ. Rev. 56 2 2011 233 245
12. C.T. Chen, C.T. Lin, and S.F. Huang A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management Int. J. Prod. Econ. 102 2 2006 289 301
13. C.T. Chen A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center Fuzzy Set Syst. 118 2001 65 73
14. C.T. Chen Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment Fuzzy Set Syst. 114 2000 1 9
15. P.-C. Chen A fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model in employee recruitment Int. J. Comput. Sci. Network Security 9 7 2009 113 117
16. S.M. Chen, and L.W. Lee Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method Expert Syst. Appl. 37 4 2010 2790 2798
17. S.J. Chen, and C.L. Hwang Fuzzy multi attribute decision making Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System Series vol. 375 1992 Springer-Verlag New York
18. T.H. Chen, and J.M. Chen Optimizing supply chain collaboration based on joint replenishment and channel coordination Transp. Res. Part E 41 4 2005 261 285
19. Y.-J. Chen Structured methodology for supplier selection and evaluation in a supply chain Inf. Sci. 181 9 2011 1651 1670
20. Choi, T.M.; Li, D.; Yan, H.; Chui, C.; 2008. Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives. 36 (4), 565-576
21. A.K. Choudhury, R. Shankar, and M.K. Tiwari Consensus-based intelligent group decision making model for the selection of advanced technology Decis. Support Syst. 42 (3) 2006 1776 1799
22. T.C. Chu, and Y.C. Lin An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model Expert Syst. Appl. 36 2009 10870 10876
23. T.C. Chu, and Y. Lin Improved extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment J. Inform. Optim. Sci. 23 2002 273 286
24. T.C. Chu Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach. International J. Advanc. Manuf. Technol. 20 2002 859 864
25. L. Dimova, P. Sevastianov, and D. Sevastiano MCDM in a fuzzy setting: investment projects assessment application Int. J. Prod. Econ. 100 1 2006 10 29
26. Y. Dong, Y. Xu, H. Li, and B. Feng The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203 2010 455 463
27. E. Eskigun, R. Uzsoy, P.V. Preckel, G. Beaujon, S. Krishnan, and J.D. Tew Outbound supply chain network design with mode selection, lead times and capacitated vehicle distribution centers Eur. J. Oper. Res. 165 2005 182 206
28. M.L. Fisher, A. Raman, and A.S. McClelland Rocket science retailing is almost here: are you ready? Harv. Bus. Rev. 72 3 1994 83 93
29. J. Gaudreault, J.M. Frayret, and G. Pesant Distributed search for supply chain coordination Comput. Ind. 60 2009 441 451
30. K. Govindan, and P. Murugesan Selection of third-party reverse logistics provider using fuzzy extent analysis Benchmarking 18 1 2011 149 167
31. A. Hadi-Vencheh, and M.N. Mokhtarian A new fuzzy MCDM approach based on centroid of fuzzy numbers Expert Syst. Appl. 38 5 2011 5226 5230
32. N. Haq, and G. Kannan Design of an integrated supplier selection and multi echelon distribution inventory model in a built-to-order supply chain environment Int. J. Prod. Res. 44 10 2006 1963 1985
33. J.-C. Hennet, and Y. Arda Supply chain coordination: a game-theory approach Eng. Appl. Art. Intell. 21 3 2008 399 405
34. F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and J.L. Verdegay A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments Fuzzy Set Syst. 78 1996 73 87
35. E. Herrera-Viedma, S. Alonso, F. Chiclana, and F. Herrera A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15 5 2007 863 877
36. E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martínez, F. Mata, and F. Chiclana A consensus support systems model for group decision making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 13 2005 644 658
37. E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, and F. Chiclana A consensus model for multi-person decision making with different preference structures IEEE Trans. Syst.; Man Cybern. - Part A 32 3 2002 394 402
38. F. Huq, K. Cutright, V. Jones, and D.A. Hensler Simulation study of a two-level warehouse inventory replenishment system Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 36 1 2006 51 65
39. C.L. Hwang, and K. Yoon Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications 1981 Springer-Heidelberg Berlin
40. G.R. Jahanshahloo, L.F. Hosseinzadeh, and M. Izadikhah Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data Appl. Math. Comput. 181 2006 1544 1551
41. K.N. Jha, and K.C. Iyer Critical determinants of project coordination Int. J. Proj. Manage. 24 4 2006 314 322
42. C. Kahraman, S. Cevik, N.Y. Ates, and M. Gulbay Fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation of industrial robotic systems Comput. Indust. Eng. 52 2007 414 433
43. A. Kaufmann, and M.M. Gupta Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications 1991 Van Nostrand Reinhold New York
44. R.L. Keeny, and H. Raiffa Decisions with Multiple Objectives 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, U.K
45. B. Kim, and H. Oh The impact of decision making sharing between supplier and manufacturer on their collaboration performance Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 10 3-4 2005 223 236
46. D. Klein, and A. Orsborn Concatenate coordination and mutual coordination J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72 1 2009 176 187
47. S.T. Larsen European logistics beyond 2000 Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logistics Manage. 30/6 2000 377 387
48. H.S. Lee A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of the distribution center Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3612 2005 1290 1299
49. C.H. Lee, and B.-D. Rhee Channel coordination using product returns for a supply chain with stochastic salvage capacity Eur. J, Oper. Res 177 1 2007 214 238
50. X. Li, and Q. Wang Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 179 1 2007 1 16
51. G.S. Liang Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts Eur. J. Oper. Res. 112 1999 682 691
52. T.W. Malone, and K. Crowston The interdisciplinary study of coordination ACM Comput. Surv. 26/1 1994 87 119
53. F. Mata, L. Mart́nez, and E. Herrera-Viedma An adaptive consensus support model for group decision-making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17 2 2009 279 290
54. S. Önüt, T. Efendigil, and S. Soner Kara A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: an example from Istanbul, Turkey Expert Syst. Appl. 37 3 2010 1973 1980
55. S. Onut, S.S. Kara, and E. Isik Long-term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: a case study for a telecommunication company Expert Syst. Appl. 36 2009 3887 3895
56. R. Piplani, and Y. Fu A coordination framework for supply chain inventory alignment J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 16 6 2005 598 614
57. M. Punakivi, and V. Hinkka Selection criteria of transportation mode: a case study in four Finnish industrial sectors Transp. Rev. 26 2 2006 207 219
58. K. Ramdas, and R.E. Spekman Chain or shackles: understanding what drives supply-chain performance Interfaces 30 4 2000 3 21
59. M. Reddy, and C. Rajendran A simulation study of dynamic order-up-to policies in a supply chain with non-stationary customer demand and information sharing Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 25 9-10 2005 1029 1045
60. T.M. Simatupang, and R. Sridharan The collaborative supply chain Int. J. Logistics Manage. 13/1 2002 15 30
61. C. Sun, G.T.R. Lin, and G. Tzeng The evaluation of cluster policy by fuzzy MCDM: empirical evidence from HsinChu Science Park Expert Syst. Appl. 36 9 2009 11895 11906
62. A. Toloie Eshlaghy, and M. Kalantary Supplier selection by Neo-TOPSIS Appl. Math. Sci. 5 17-20 2011 837 844
63. P. Toktaş-Palut, and F. Ülengin Coordination in a two-stage capacitated supply chain with multiple suppliers Eur. J. Oper. Res. 212 1 2011 43 53
64. E. Triantaphyllou, and C.L. Lin Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 14 1996 281 310
65. U.R. Tuzkaya, and S. Önüt A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: a case study Inf. Sci. 178 2008 3133 3146
66. F. Ulengin, S. Onsel, Y.I. Topcßu, E. Aktas, and O. Kabak An integrated transportation decision support system for transportation policy decisions: the case of Turkey Transp. Res. Part A 41 2007 80 97
67. B. Van der Rhdd, R. Verma, and G. Plaschka Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: the role of flexibility, delivery, and value added service/support Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120 1 2009 30 41
68. C.X. Wang, and M. Benaroch Supply chain coordination in buyer centric B2B electronic markets Int. J. Prod. Econ. 92 2 2004 113 124
69. T.C. Wang, and H.D. Lee Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights Expert. Syst. Appl. 36 5 2009 8980 8985
70. T.C. Wang, and T.H. Chang Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment Expert Syst. Appl. 33 2007 870 880
71. V.W. Wang, C.H. Cheng, and H.K. Cheng Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection Appl. Soft Comput. 9 2009 377 386
72. Y.J. Wang, H.S. Lee, and K. Lin Fuzzy TOPSIS for multi-criteria decision-making Int. Math. J. 3 2003 367 379
73. Y.M. Wang, and Y. Luo Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attributes weights in multiple attribute decision making Math. Comput. Model. 51 1-2 2010 1 12
74. J.L. Wilson, and C. Shi Coordination mechanisms for cooperative design Eng. App. Artif. Intell. 9 1996 453 461
75. Wong, C.Y.; Johansen, J.; Hvolby, H.H.; 2004. Supply Chain Coordination Problems: Literature review. Working Paper, No. 08-04.
76. W.Y. Wu, B.M. Sukoco, C.Y. Li, and S.H. Chen An integrated multiobjective decision-making process for supplier selection with bundling problem Experts Syst. Appl. 36 2009 2327 2337
77. H. Wu, G. Tzeng, and Y. Chen A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on balanced scorecard Expert Syst. Appl. 36 6 2009 10135 10147
78. Z. Xu, and X.Q. Cai Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations Inf. Sci. 181 2011 150 162
79. X. Xue, Y. Wang, Q. Shen, and X. Yu Coordination mechanisms for construction supply chain management in the internet environment Int. J. Proj. Manage. 25 2 2007 150 157
80. R.R. Yager On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi criteria decision making IEEE Trans. SMC - Part A 8 1998 183 190
81. R.R. Yager On the analytic representation of the Leximin ordering and its application to flexible constraint propagation Eur. J. Oper. Res. 102 1997 129 145
82. R.R. Yager On weighted median aggregation Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzz. Knowledge-based Syst. 2 1994 101 113
83. J.L. Yang, H.N. Chiu, G.-H. Tzeng, and R.H. Yeh Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships Informat. Sci.: Int. J. 178 21 2008 4166 4183
84. P.C. Yang, and H.M. Wee A single-vendor and multiple buyers' production - inventory policy for deteriorating item Eur. J. Oper. Res. 143 3 2002 570 581
85. J.M. Yeh, B. Kreng, and C. Lin A consensus approach for synthesizing the elements of comparison matrix in the Analytic Hierarchy Process Int. J. Syst. Sci. 32 2001 1353 1363
86. D. Yong Plant selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 28 2006 839 844
87. L.A. Zadeh Fuzzy sets Informat. Control 8 3 1965 338 353
88. Zheng, H.; 2010. Supply chain disruption risk evaluation based on TOPSIS method with sensitivity analyses ICLEM 2010: Logistics for Sustained Economic Development - Infrastructure, Information and Integration. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference of Logistics Engineering and Management 387, pp. 4762-4769.
89. X. Zou, S. Pokharel, and R. Piplani A two-period supply contract model for a decentralized assembly system Eur. J. Oper. Res. 187 1 2008 257 274