An integrated transportation decision support system for transportation policy decisions: The case of Turkey

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 80-97

  Ülengin, Füsun ^a   Önsel, Şule ^a   Ilker Topcu Y ^b   Aktaş, Emel ^b   Kabak, Özgür ^b  

^a DOGUS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Bayesian causal map; Decision support system; Scenario analysis; Transportation policy development; Turkey

Indexed keywords

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; PASSENGER CARS; PUBLIC POLICY; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BAYESIAN CAUSAL MAP; SCENARIO ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION POLICY DEVELOPMENT; TURKEY;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 33746862612     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2006.05.010     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Axelrod R. Structure of Decision (1976), University of Princeton Press, Princeton, NJ
2. 2 concentrations in highly polluted industrial areas of complex terrain. Atmospheric Environment, B Urban Atmosphere 27B (1993) 221-230
3. Button K.J. Transport Economics. second. ed. (1993), Edward Elgar Publishing Company, Aldershot, England
4. DETR: Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, 1998. A New Deal for Transport: Better for Everyone, Cmnd 3950 The Stationery Office, London.
5. Eden C., and Ackermann F. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management (1998), Sage, London
6. ETP, 2000. White Paper: European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide.
7. Gately E. Neural Networks for Financial Forecasting (1996), John Wiley & Sons, USA
8. Hruschka H. Determining market response functions by neural network modeling: a comparison to econometric techniques. European Journal of Operational Research 66 1 (1993) 27-35
9. Hwarng H.B., and Ang H.T. A simple neural network for ARMA (p, q) time series. Omega 29 (2001) 319-333
10. Jensen F.V. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs (2001), Springer-Verlag, New York
11. Nadkarni S., and Shenoy P. A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps. European Journal of Operational Research 128 (2001) 479-498
12. Nadkarni S., and Shenoy P. A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks. Decision Support Systems 38 (2004) 259-281
13. Opperheim N. Urban Travel Demand Modeling, from Individual Choices to General Equilibrium (1995), John Wiley and Sons, New York
14. Schafer A., and Victor D. The future mobility of the world population. Transportation Research Part A 34 (2000) 171-205
15. Shaw J., Walton W., and Farrington J. Assessing the potential for a railway renaissance in Great Britain. Geoforum 34 (2003) 141-156
16. Swanson N.R., and White H. Forecasting economic time series using flexible versus fixed specification and linear versus nonlinear econometric models. International Journal of Forecasting 13 4 (1997) 439-461
17. Transportation Master Plan Strategy, 2004. Published for Ministry of Transportation, Turkey.
18. Transport Research: APAS, 1999. Strategic transport, databases and scenarios for European Transport. Luxembourg: Office for Publications of the European Commission.
19. Yoon Y., Swales G., and Margavio T.M. A comparison of discriminant analysis versus artificial neural networks. Journal of Operational Research 44 1 (1993) 51-60