Bioinformatic identification of genes suppressing genome instability

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 47, 2012, Pages

  Putnam, Christopher D ^a,b   Allen Soltero, Stephanie R ^a,c   Martinez, Sandra L ^a   Chan, Jason E ^a,b   Hayes, Tikvah K ^a,d   Kolodner, Richard D ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damage; DNA repair; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GROSS CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT GENE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA DAMAGE; GENES, FUNGAL; GENES, SUPPRESSOR; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84869786257     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216733109     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100(1):57-70.
2. Loeb LA (2001) A mutator phenotype in cancer. Cancer Res 61(8):3230-3239.
3. Hoeijmakers JH (2001) Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411(6835):366-374.
4. Vessey CJ, Norbury CJ, Hickson ID (1999) Genetic disorders associated with cancer predisposition and genomic instability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 63:189-221.
5. Soussi T, Ishioka C, Claustres M, Béroud C (2006) Locus-specific mutation databases: Pitfalls and good practice based on the p53 experience. Nat Rev Cancer 6(1):83-90.
6. van de Wetering CI, Horne MC, Knudson CM (2007) Chromosomal instability and supernumerary centrosomes represent precursor defects in a mouse model of T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res 67(17):8081-8088.
7. Chen C, Kolodner RD (1999) Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat Genet 23(1):81-85.
8. Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD (2004) Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast. Nat Genet 36(6):612-617.
9. Putnam CD, Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD (2004) Chromosome healing through terminal deletions generated by de novo telomere additions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(36):13262-13267.
10. Putnam CD, Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to define the chromosomal instability phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 25(16): 7226-7238.
11. Pennaneach V, Kolodner RD (2009) Stabilization of dicentric translocations through secondary rearrangements mediated by multiple mechanisms in S. cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6389.
12. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K (2002) Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297(5581):552-557.
13. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD (2009) Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. Nature 460(7258):984-989.
14. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD (2010) Post-replication repair suppresses duplication-mediated genome instability. PLoS Genet 6(5):e1000933.
15. Chan JE, Kolodner RD (2011) A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements. PLoS Genet 7(5):e1002089.
16. Wang Y, et al. (2005) Mutation in Rpa1 results in defective DNA double-strand break repair, chromosomal instability and cancer in mice. Nat Genet 37(7):750-755.
17. Huang ME, Rio AG, Nicolas A, Kolodner RD (2003) A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(20):11529-11534.
18. Smith S, et al. (2004) Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(24):9039-9044.
19. Kanellis P, et al. (2007) A screen for suppressors of gross chromosomal rearrangements identifies a conserved role for PLP in preventing DNA lesions. PLoS Genet 3(8):e134.
20. Stirling PC, et al. (2011) The complete spectrum of yeast chromosome instability genes identifies candidate CIN cancer genes and functional roles for ASTRA complex components. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1002057.
21. Jordan PW, Klein F, Leach DR (2007) Novel roles for selected genes in meiotic DNA processing. PLoS Genet 3(12):e222.
22. Leek JT, et al. (2010) Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nat Rev Genet 11(10):733-739.
23. Beissbarth T, Speed TP (2004) GOstat: Find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics 20(9):1464-1465.
24. Ashburner M, et al.; The Gene Ontology Consortium (2000) Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25(1):25-29.
25. Ye P, et al. (2005) Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast. Mol Syst Biol 1:2005.0026.
26. Tischler J, Lehner B, Fraser AG (2008) Evolutionary plasticity of genetic interaction networks. Nat Genet 40(4):390-391.
27. Daniel JA, Yoo J, Bettinger BT, Amberg DC, Burke DJ (2006) Eliminating gene conversion improves high-throughput genetics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172(1):709-711.
28. Singh I, Pass R, Togay SO, Rodgers JW, Hartman JL, 4th (2009) Stringent mating-type-regulated auxotrophy increases the accuracy of systematic genetic interaction screens with Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant arrays. Genetics 181(1):289-300.
29. Lehner KR, Stone MM, Farber RA, Petes TD (2007) Ninety-six haploid yeast strains with individual disruptions of open reading frames between YOR097C and YOR192C, constructed for the Saccharomyces genome deletion project, have an additional mutation in the mismatch repair gene MSH3. Genetics 177(3):1951-1953.
30. Game JC, et al. (2003) Use of a genome-wide approach to identify new genes that control resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ionizing radiation. Radiat Res 160 (1):14-24.
31. Bandyopadhyay S, et al. (2010) Rewiring of genetic networks in response to DNA damage. Science 330(6009):1385-1389.
32. Myung K, Datta A, Chen C, Kolodner RD (2001) SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 27(1):113-116.
33. Chen C, Umezu K, Kolodner RD (1998) Chromosomal rearrangements occur in S. cerevisiae rfa1 mutator mutants due to mutagenic lesions processed by doublestrand-break repair. Mol Cell 2(1):9-22.
34. Chang M, et al. (2005) RMI1/NCE4, a suppressor of genome instability, encodes a member of the RecQ helicase/Topo III complex. EMBO J 24(11):2024-2033.
35. Lengsfeld BM, Rattray AJ, Bhaskara V, Ghirlando R, Paull TT (2007) Sae2 is an endonuclease that processes hairpin DNA cooperatively with the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex. Mol Cell 28(4):638-651.
36. Marmorstein R, Trievel RC (2009) Histone modifying enzymes: Structures, mechanisms, and specificities. Biochim Biophys Acta 1789(1):58-68.
37. Myung K, Pennaneach V, Kats ES, Kolodner RD (2003) Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(11):6640-6645.
38. Reed SH, Gillette TG (2007) Nucleotide excision repair and the ubiquitin proteasome pathway - Do all roads lead to Rome? DNA Repair (Amst) 6(2):149-156.
39. Park EC, Szostak JW (1992) ARD1 and NAT1 proteins form a complex that has N-terminal acetyltransferase activity. EMBO J 11(6):2087-2093.
40. Schuldiner M, et al. (2008) The GET complex mediates insertion of tail-anchored proteins into the ER membrane. Cell 134(4):634-645.
41. Myung K, Datta A, Kolodner RD (2001) Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104 (3):397-408.
42. García-Higuera I, et al. (2008) Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nat Cell Biol 10(7):802-811.
43. Lutzmann M, Kunze R, Buerer A, Aebi U, Hurt E (2002) Modular self-assembly of a Y-shaped multiprotein complex from seven nucleoporins. EMBO J 21(3):387-397.
44. Palancade B, et al. (2007) Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 18(8):2912-2923.
45. Nagai S, et al. (2008) Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322(5901):597-602.
46. Ben-Aroya S, et al. (2010) Proteasome nuclear activity affects chromosome stability by controlling the turnover of Mms22, a protein important for DNA repair. PLoS Genet 6 (2):e1000852.
47. Motegi A, Murakawa Y, Takeda S (2009) The vital link between the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and DNA repair: impact on cancer therapy. Cancer Lett 283(1): 1-9.
48. Alvaro D, Lisby M, Rothstein R (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet 3(12):e228.
49. Scholes DT, Banerjee M, Bowen B, Curcio MJ (2001) Multiple regulators of Ty1 transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have conserved roles in genome maintenance. Genetics 159(4):1449-1465.
50. Gangloff S, Soustelle C, Fabre F (2000) Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases. Nat Genet 25(2):192-194.
51. Stark C, et al. (2006) BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Database issue):D535-D539.
52. Collins SR, et al. (2007) Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446(7137):806-810.
53. Jessulat M, et al. (2008) Interacting proteins Rtt109 and Vps75 affect the efficiency of non-homologous end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Biochem Biophys 469(2):157-164.
54. Schuldiner M, et al. (2005) Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile. Cell 123(3):507-519.
55. Wilmes GM, et al. (2008) A genetic interaction map of RNA-processing factors reveals links between Sem1/Dss1-containing complexes and mRNA export and splicing. Mol Cell 32(5):735-746.
56. Fiedler D, et al. (2009) Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell 136(5):952-963.
57. Costanzo M, et al. (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327(5964):425-431.
58. Jaccard P (1901) Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat, 37:241-272, French.
59. Xu R, Wunsch D, 2nd (2005) Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(3):645-678.
60. Askree SH, et al. (2004) A genome-wide screen for Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants that affect telomere length. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(23):8658-8663.
61. Gatbonton T, et al. (2006) Telomere length as a quantitative trait: Genome-wide survey and genetic mapping of telomere length-control genes in yeast. PLoS Genet 2 (3):e35.
62. Griffith JL, et al. (2003) Functional genomics reveals relationships between the retrovirus-like Ty1 element and its host Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 164(3):867-879.
63. Irwin B, et al. (2005) Retroviruses and yeast retrotransposons use overlapping sets of host genes. Genome Res 15(5):641-654.
64. Ouspenski II, Elledge SJ, Brinkley BR (1999) New yeast genes important for chromosome integrity and segregation identified by dosage effects on genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res 27(15):3001-3008.
65. Yuen KW, et al. (2007) Systematic genome instability screens in yeast and their potential relevance to cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(10):3925-3930.
66. Andersen MP, Nelson ZW, Hetrick ED, Gottschling DE (2008) A genetic screen for increased loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179(3):1179-1195.