Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 591-601

  Perdigao J ^a   Dutra Correa M ^b   Saraceni, S H C ^b   Ciaramicoli, M T ^b   Kiyan, V H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b PAULISTA UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILTEK SUPREME PLUS; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; NANOMATERIAL; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NANOSTRUCTURES; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH WEAR;

EID: 84869761695     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/11-415-C     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wilson AD, & Kent BE (1971) The glass-ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material Journal of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology 21(11) 313.
2. Sidhu SK, & Watson TF (1995) Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry American Journal of Dentistry 8(1) 59-67.
3. Mitra SB (1991) Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base Journal of Dental Research 70(1) 72-74.
4. Friedl KH, Powers JM, & Hiller KA (1995) Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers Operative Dentistry 20(2) 74-80.
5. Nicholson JW, & Croll TP (1997) Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry Quintessence International 28(11) 705-714. (Pubitemid 127712265)
6. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, & Rusin RP (2009) Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer Dental Materials 25(4) 459-466.
7. Fukuda R, Yoshida Y, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Inoue S, Sano H, Suzuki K, Shintani H, & Van Meerbeek B (2003) Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel, and dentin Biomaterials 24(11) 1861-1867. (Pubitemid 36293331)
8. Yiu CK, Tay FR, King NM, Pashley DH, Sidhu SK, Neo JC, Toledano M, & Wong SL (2004) Interaction of glassionomer cements with moist dentin Journal of Dental Research 83(4) 283-289. (Pubitemid 41713762)
9. Yip HK, Tay FR, Ngo HC, Smales RJ, & Pashley DH (2001) Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin Dental Materials 17(5) 456-470. (Pubitemid 33651218)
10. Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, & Pashley DH (2001) Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(2) 153-167. (Pubitemid 33771571)
11. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials Dental Materials 21(9) 864-881. (Pubitemid 41108347)
12. Belli S, Unlu N, & Ozer F (2001) Bonding strength to two different surfaces of dentin under simulated pulpal pressure Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(2) 145-152. (Pubitemid 33771570)
13. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, & Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235. (Pubitemid 37237447)
14. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, & Sano H (2001) Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on microtensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive Dental Materials 17(5) 445-455. (Pubitemid 33651217)
15. Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SH, & Pashley DH (2001) Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(2) 153-167. (Pubitemid 33771571)
16. Lin A, McIntyre NS, & Davidson RD (1992) Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin Journal of Dental Research 71(11) 1836-1841.
17. Tyas MJ, & Burrow MF (2002) Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: Results at five years Operative Dentistry 27(5) 438-441. (Pubitemid 41558772)
18. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, & Vanherle G (2003) Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resinmodified glass-ionomer adhesive American Journal of Dentistry 16(6) 363-368. (Pubitemid 41310031)
19. Van Dijken JW (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dental Materials 16(4) 285-291.
20. Coutinho E, Cardoso MV, De Munck J, Neves AA, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, & Van Meerbeek B (2009) Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nanofilled resin-modified glass-ionomer Dental Materials 25(11) 1347-1357.
21. Ketac Nano Light-Curing Glass Ionomer Technical Data Sheet; Retrieved online October 19, 2011 from: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/mediawebserver?mwsId= 66666UuZjcFSLXTtnxTclxMEEVuQEcuZgVs6EVs6E666666-&fn=ketac-nano-tds.pdf
22. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Bayne SC, May KN, Sturdevant JR, & Roberson TM (2001) Clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 1-6. (Pubitemid 33660534)
23. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, & Lambrechts P (2004) Four-year water degradation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin European Journal of Oral Sciences 112(1) 73-83. (Pubitemid 38623867)
24. Tyas MJ (2003) Milestones in adhesion: Glass-ionomer cements Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(4) 259-266. (Pubitemid 38270999)
25. Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Fukuda R, Snauwaert J, Nakayama Y, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, & Van Meerbeek B (2007) Gel phase formation at resinmodified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces Journal of Dental Research 86(7) 656-661.
26. Cardoso MV, Delmé K I M, Mine A, Neves AA, Coutinho E, De Moor R J G, & Van Meerbeek B (2010) Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mechanism of resinmodified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin Journal of Dentistry 38(11) 921-929.
27. Attar M, & Nathanson D (2011) Conditioner/primer effect on two resin modified glassionomers Journal of Dental Research 90 (Special Issue A) Abstract 115 (http://www.dentalresearch.org).
28. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, & Vanherle G (1997) Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials Journal of Dental Research 76(4) 883-894. (Pubitemid 127732680)
29. Mount GJ, Patel C, & Makinson OF (2002) Resin modified glass-ionomers: Strength, cure depth, and translucency Australian Dental Journal 47(4) 339-343.
30. USAF Dental Evaluation & Consultation Service (2010) Ketac Nano Light-Curing Glass Ionomer Restorative (3M ESPE) (Project #07-025) (11/10). Retrieved online March 31, 2012 from: http://airforcemedicine.afms.mil/idc/ groups/public/documents/afms/ctb-143573.pdf
31. Sidhu SK, Pilecki P, Sherriff M, & Watson TF (2004) Crack closure on rehydration of glass-ionomer materials European Journal of Oral Sciences 112(5) 465-469. (Pubitemid 39456965)
32. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, & De Long R (2010) Does hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Journal of Dental Research 89 (Special Issue A) Abstract #455 (www.dentalresearch.org).
33. Neo J, Chew CL, Yap A, & Sidhu S (1996) Clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in cervical lesions American Journal of Dentistry 9(1) 15-18. (Pubitemid 126441835)
34. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, & Hickel R (2001) Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials-3-year results Clinical Oral Investigations 5(1) 31-39.
35. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, & Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(4) 323-332. (Pubitemid 38271005)
36. Maneenut C, & Tyas MJ (1995) Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: One-year results Quintessence International 26(10) 739-743.
37. Hammady N, El-Kassas D, Fahmy O, & El Zogb A (2011) Influence of restorative material thickness on its color and translucency Journal of Dental Research 90 (Special Issue A) Abstract #642 (www.dentalresearch.org).
38. Loguercio AD, Ferri L, Ferreira T R C, & Reis A (2011) Clinical evaluation of a new simplified adhesive in cervical lesions Journal of Dental Research 90 (Special Issue A) Abstract 149 (www.dentalresearch.org).
39. Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni C H C, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, & Queiroz CS (2012) Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results Operative Dentistry 37(1) 3-11.
40. Perdigão J, Gomes G, & Sezinando A (2011) Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatigue American Journal of Dentistry 24(4) 159-164.