Bonding effectiveness and interfacial characterization of a nano-filled resin-modified glass-ionomer

Dental Materials

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1347-1357

  Coutinho, E ^a   Cardoso, M V ^a   De Munck, J ^a   Neves, A A ^a   Van Landuyt, K L ^a   Poitevin, A ^a   Peumans, M ^a   Lambrechts, P ^a   Van Meerbeek, B ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Dentin bonding; Hybrid layer; Nano technology; Resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

BONDING EFFECTIVENESS; BONDING MECHANISM; CHEMICAL INTERACTIONS; DENTIN BONDING; FILLER DISTRIBUTION; GLASS-IONOMERS; HIGH FILLER; HUMAN THIRD MOLAR; HYBRID LAYER; INTERFACIAL CHARACTERIZATION; INTERFACIAL INTERACTION; LAYER FORMATION; MICRO-MECHANICAL; MICRO-TENSILE BOND STRENGTH; NANOFILLER; POLISHABILITY; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; TEM;

ADHESION; ENAMELS; FILLERS; GLASS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; IONOMERS; RESINS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

GLASS BONDING;

FUJI II LC CEMENT; FUJI IX GP FAST; GLASS IONOMER; NANOMATERIAL; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ADHESIVENESS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; NANOSTRUCTURES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 70349509409     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., and Vanherle G. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive. Am J Dent 16 6 (2003) 363-368
2. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Vijay P., et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28 3 (2003) 215-235
3. van Dijken J.W. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 16 4 (2000) 285-291
4. Tyas M.J., and Burrow M.F. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system: results at five years. Oper Dent 27 5 (2002) 438-441
5. Peumans M., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21 9 (2005) 864-881
6. van Dijken J.W., and Pallesen U. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions. Dent Mater 24 7 (2008) 915-922
7. Mjor I.A., and Gordan V.V. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 27 5 (2002) 528-534
8. Naasan M.A., and Watson T.F. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 11 1 (1998) 36-45
9. Markovic D., Petrovic B.B., and Peric T.O. Fluoride content and recharge ability of five glassionomer dental materials. BMC Oral Health 8 1 (2008) 21-28
10. Belli S., Unlu N., and Ozer F. Bonding strength to two different surfaces of dentin under simulated pulpal pressure. J Adhes Dent 3 2 (2001) 145-152
11. Inoue S., Van Meerbeek B., Abe Y., Yoshida Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dent Mater 17 5 (2001) 445-455
12. Kerby R.E., and Knobloch L. Strength characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent 17 5 (1992) 170-174
13. Perdigao J., Lambrechts P., Van Meerbeek B., Vanherle G., and Lopes A.L. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 29 9 (1995) 1111-1120
14. Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., Duke E.S., Eick J.D., et al. A TEM study of two water-based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 77 1 (1998) 50-59
15. Mitra S.B. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 70 1 (1991) 72-74
16. Titley K.C., Smith D.C., and Chernecky R. SEM observations of the reactions of the components of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement on bovine dentine. J Dent 24 6 (1996) 411-416
17. Coutinho E., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Fukuda R., Snauwaert J., Nakayama Y., et al. Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res 86 7 (2007) 656-661
18. Yiu C.K., Tay F.R., King N.M., Pashley D.H., Sidhu S.K., Neo J.C., et al. Interaction of glass-ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res 83 4 (2004) 283-289
19. Coutinho E., Van Landuyt K., De Munck J., Poitevin A., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., et al. Development of a self-etch adhesive for resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 85 4 (2006) 349-353
20. De Munck J., Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Suzuki K., and Lambrechts P. Four-year water degradation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 112 1 (2004) 73-83
21. Lambrechts P., Debels E., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., and Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 22 8 (2006) 693-701
22. Sidhu S.K., and Watson T.F. Interfacial characteristics of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials: a study on fluid permeability using confocal fluorescence microscopy. J Dent Res 77 9 (1998) 1749-1759
23. Watson T.F., Pagliari D., Sidhu S.K., and Naasan M.A. Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces. Biomaterials 19 6 (1998) 581-588
24. Sidhu S.K., Pilecki P., Cheng P.C., and Watson T.F. The morphology and stability of resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive at the dentin/resin-based composite interface. Am J Dent 15 2 (2002) 129-136
25. Sidhu S.K., Sherriff M., and Watson T.F. Failure of resin-modified glass-ionomers subjected to shear loading. J Dent 27 5 (1999) 373-381
26. Hewlett E.R., Caputo A.A., and Wrobel D.C. Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment of dentin with polyacrylic acid. J Prosthet Dent 66 6 (1991) 767-772
27. Peutzfeldt A., and Asmussen E. Effect of polyacrylic acid treatment of dentin on adhesion of glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 48 5 (1990) 337-341
28. Tyler M.W., Fitzgerald M., Dennison J.B., and Heys D.R. The effect of pulpal fluid flow on tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement: an in vivo and in vitro comparison. Oper Dent 19 3 (1994) 116-120
29. Inoue S., Abe Y., Yoshida Y., De Munck J., Sano H., Suzuki K., et al. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent 29 6 (2004) 685-692
30. Pocius A.V. Adhesion and adhesives technology: an introduction. 1st ed. (1996), Hanser Gardner, Cincinnati