Diagnostic performance of intracoronary gradient-based methods by coronary computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of physiologically significant coronary artery stenoses: A validation study with fractional flow reserve

European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1001-1007

  Choi, Jin Ho ^a   Koo, Bon Kwon ^b   Yoon, Yeonyee E ^b   Min, James K ^c   Song, Young Bin ^a   Hahn, Joo Yong ^a   Choi, Seung Hyuk ^a   Gwon, Hyeon Cheol ^a   Choe, Yeon Hyeon ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast dye gradient; Coronary computed tomography; Fractional flow reserve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORRECTED CORONARY OPACIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EPICARDIUM; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSLUMINAL ATTENUATION GRADIENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84869460835     PISSN: 20472404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes130     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blankstein R, Di Carli MF. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010;7:226-36.
2. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, Weustink A, Pugliese F, Mollet NR et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:636-43.
3. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2324-36.
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52: 1724-32.
5. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1989-97.
6. Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 2010;362:886-95.
7. Mahajan N, Polavaram L, Vankayala H, Ference B, Wang Y, Ager J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of left main and triple vessel coronary artery disease: a comparative meta-analysis. Heart 2010;96:956-66.
8. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van't Veer M et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-24.
9. Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Hur SH et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;3:812-7.
10. Sarno G, Decraemer I, Vanhoenacker PK, De Bruyne B, Hamilos M, Cuisset T et al. On the inappropriateness of noninvasive multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to trigger coronary revascularization: a comparison with invasive angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:550-7.
11. Choi JH, Choe YH, Min JK. From stenosis imaging to functional imaging: a new horizon of coronary computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;27: 1045-7.
12. Steigner ML, Mitsouras D, Whitmore AG, Otero HJ, Wang C, Buckley O et al. Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;3:179-86.
13. Lackner K, Bovenschulte H, Stutzer H, Just T, Al-Hassani H, Krug B. In vitro measurements of flow using multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;27:795-804.
14. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, Lin FY, Mendoza DD, Shin DH et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:1149-57.
15. Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagne O, Chen L, Yam Y, Dick A et al. Can differences in corrected coronary opacification measured with computed tomography predict resting coronary artery flow? J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1280-8.
16. Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S, Berman DS, Boxt LM, Budoff MJ et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009;3:122-36.
17. Lin F, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ, Weinsaft JW, Wong FJ et al. Multidetector computed tomography coronary artery plaque predictors of stress-induced myocardial ischemia by SPECT. Atherosclerosis 2008;197:700-9. (Pubitemid 351417867)
18. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Jr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27:157-72; discussion 207-112. (Pubitemid 351193639)
19. Hulten EA, Carbonaro S, Petrillo SP, Mitchell JD, Villines TC. Prognostic value of cardiac computed tomography angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:1237-47.
20. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL. Measurement from arteriograms of regional myocardial bed size distal to any point in the coronary vascular tree for assessing anatomic area at risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:783-97. (Pubitemid 23076298)
21. Itskovich VV, Kraft KA, Fei DY. Rapid aortic wave velocity measurement with MR imaging. Radiology 2001;219:551-7. (Pubitemid 32336377)
22. Kern MJ, Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;55:173-85.
23. Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS, Rocha-Filho JA, Okada DR, Sarwar A et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:1072-84.
24. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010;256:32-61.