Current Concepts of Integrated Coronary Physiology in the Catheterization Laboratory

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 173-185

  Kern, Morton J ^a   Samady, Habib ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

angiography; coronary stenoses; physiology; severity

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; DOBUTAMINE;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIAC PATIENT; CINEANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; CORONARY SINUS; CORONARY STENT; CORONARY VASCULAR RESISTANCE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCINTIGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STENT THROMBOSIS; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 73549104615     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.062     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Pijls N.H.J., DeBruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334 (1996) 1703-1708
2. Pijls N.H.J., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92 (1995) 318-319
3. Bech G.J., DeBruyne B., Pijls N.H., et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 103 (2001) 2928-2934
4. Ziaee A., Parham W.A., Herrmann S.C., et al. Lack of relation between imaging and physiology in ostial coronary artery narrowings. Am J Cardiol 93 (2004) 1404-1407
5. Koo B.K., Kang H.J., Youn T.J., et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 633-637
6. Bech G.J., Droste H., Pijls N.H., et al. Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease. Heart 86 (2001) 547-552
7. Lindstaedt M., Yazar A., Germing A., et al. Clinical outcome in patients with intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery disease after deferral of surgical revascularization on the basis of fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 152 (2006) 156
8. Berger A., Botman K.J., MacCarthy P.A., et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 438-442
9. Lindstaedt M., Fritz M.K., Yazar A., et al. Optimizing revascularization strategies in patients with multivessel coronary disease: impact of intracoronary pressure measurements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 (2005) 897-903
10. Botman K.J., Pijls N.H., Bech J.W., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease?. A tailored approach based on coronary pressure measurement. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 63 (2004) 184-191
11. Tonino P.A.L., DeBruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360 (2009) 213-224 3
12. Topol E.J., and Nissen S.E. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 92 (1995) 2333-2342
13. Meijboom W.B., Van Mieghem C.A.G., van Pelt N., et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52 (2008) 636-643
14. Spaan J.A.E., Piek J.J., Hoofman J.I.E., and Siebes M. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation 113 (2006) 446-455
15. DeBruyne B., Bartunek J., Sys S.U., et al. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 94 (1996) 1842-1849
16. Pijls N.H.J., Kern M.J., Yock P.G., and DeBruyne B. Practice and potential pitfalls of coronary pressure measurement. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 49 (2000) 1-16
17. Kern M.J. Interventional Physiology Rounds: Case Studies in Coronary Pressure and Flow for Clinical Practice (1998), Wiley-Liss, New York, NY
18. Pijls N.H.J., and DeBruyne B. Coronary Pressure (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
19. Jeremias A., Whitbourn R.J., Filardo S.D., et al. Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements. Am Heart J 140 (2000) 651-657
20. McGeoch R.J., and Oldroyd K.G. Pharmacological options for inducing maximal hyperaemia during studies of coronary physiology. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 198-204
21. Pijls N.H., Klauss V., Siebert U., et al., Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Post-Stent Registry Investigators. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry. Circulation 105 (2002) 2950-2954
22. Samady H., McDaniel M., Velidar E., et al. Pre stent fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post stent fractional flow reserve; implications for selection of drug eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2 (2009) 357-363
23. Christou M.A., Siontis G.C., Katritsis D.G., et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 450-456
24. Ragosta M., Bishop A.H., Lipson L.C., et al. Comparison between angiography and fractional flow reserve versus single-photon emission computed tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging for determining lesion significance in patients with multivessel coronary disease. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 896-902
25. Lima R.L., Watson D.D., Goode A.R., et al. Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 64-70
26. DeBruyne B., Bartunek J., Sys S.U., and Hendrickx G.R. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 92 (1995) 39-46
27. Bartunek J., Van Schuerbeeck E., and DeBruyne B. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reserve in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol 79 (1997) 478-481
28. Abe M., Tomiyama H., Yoshida H., and Doba N. Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve. Circulation 102 (2000) 2365-2370
29. Chamuleau S.A., Meuwissen M., van Eck-Smit B.L., et al. Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 1316-1322
30. Caymaz O., Fak A.S., Tezcan H., et al. Correlation of myocardial fraction flow reserve with thallium-201 SPECT imaging in intermediate-severity coronary artery lesions (comment in J Invasive Cardiol 2000;12:351-3). J Invasive Cardiol 12 (2000) 345-350
31. Jimenez-Navarro M., Alonso-Briales J.H., Hernandez Garcia M.J., Rodriguez Bailon I., Gomez-Doblas J.J., and de Terea Galvan E. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess moderately severe coronary lesions: correlation with dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Interv Cardiol 14 (2001) 499-504
32. Usui Y., Chikamori T., Yanagisawa H., et al. Reliability of pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve in assessing coronary artery stenosis in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 92 (2003) 699-702
33. Yanagisawa H., Chikamori T., Tanaka N., et al. Correlation between thallium-201 myocardial perfusion defects and the functional severity of coronary artery stenosis as assessed by pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve. Circ J 66 (2002) 1105-1109
34. Meuwissen M., Chamuleau S.A.J., Siebes M., et al. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 71 (2008) 291-297
35. DeBruyne B., Pijls N.H.J., Bartunek J., et al. Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation 104 (2001) 157-162
36. Samady H., Lepper W., Powers E.R., et al. Fractional flow reserve of infarct-related arteries identifies reversible defects on noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 2187-2193
37. Kern M.J., Lerman A., Bech J.W., et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization. Circulation 114 (2006) 1321-1341
38. Fearon W.F., Shah M., Ng M., et al. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 51 (2008) 560-565
39. Siebes M., Verhoeff B.J., Meuwissen M., et al. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions. Circulation 109 (2004) 756-762
40. Pijls N.H.J., Van Schaardenburgh P., Manoharan G., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant stenoses: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 2105-2111
41. Bech G.J.W., Pijls N.H.J., De Bruyne B., et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 99 (1999) 883-888
42. Hernandez Garcia M.J., Alonso-Briales J.H., Jimenez-Navarro M., et al. Clinical management of patients with coronary syndromes and negative fractional flow reserve findings. J Interv Cardiol 14 (2001) 505-509
43. Bech G.J., De Bruyne B., Bonnier H.J.R.M., et al. Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. J Am Coll Cardiol 31 (1998) 841-847
44. Rieber J., Schiele T.M., Koenig A., et al. Long-term safety of therapy stratification in patients with intermediate coronary lesions based on intracoronary pressure measurements. Am J Cardiol 90 (2002) 1160-1164
45. Chamuleau S.A.J., Meuwissen M., Koch K.T., et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve for risk stratification of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and an intermediate stenosis. Am J Cardiol 89 (2002) 377-380
46. Rieber J., Jung P., Schiele T.M., et al. Safety of FFR-based treatment strategies: the Munich experience. Z Kardiol 91 (2002) III115-III119
47. Leesar M.A., Abdul-Baki T., Yalamanchili V., Hakim J., and Kern M. Conflicting functional assessment of stenoses in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 59 (2003) 489-495
48. Kern M.J., Donohue T.J., Aguirre F.V., et al. Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements. J Am Coll Cardiol 25 (1995) 178-187
49. Ferrari M., Schnell B., Werner G.S., and Figulla H.R. Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronary flow velocity reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 33 (1999) 83-87
50. Chamuleau S.A.J., Tio R.A., de Cock C.C., et al. Prognostic value of coronary blood flow velocity and myocardial perfusion in intermediate coronary narrowings and multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39 (2002) 852-858
51. Boden W.E. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 1503-1516
52. Shaw L.J., Berman D.S., Maron D.J., et al., COURAGE Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117 (2008) 1283-1291
53. Sant'Anna F.M., Silva E.E.R., Batista L.A., et al. Influence of routine assessment of fractional flow reserve on decision making during coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 504-508
54. Berger A., Botman K.J., MacCarthy P.A., et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 438-442
55. Wongpraparut N., Yalamanchili V., Pasnoori V., et al. Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 96 (2005) 877-884
56. Courtis J., Rodés-Cabau J., Larose E., et al. Usefulness of coronary fractional flow reserve measurements in guiding clinical decisions in intermediate or equivocal left main coronary stenoses. Am J Cardiol 103 (2009) 943-949
57. Hamilos M., Muller O., Cuisset T., et al. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 120 (2009) 1505-1512
58. Koo B.K., Park K.W., Kang H.J., et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 29 (2008) 726-732
59. Botman C.J., Schonberger J., Koolen S., et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency?. A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007) 2093-2097
60. Berger A., MacCarthy P.A., Vanermen H., et al. Occlusion of internal mammary grafts: a review of the potential causative factors. Acta Chir Belg 104 (2004) 630-634
61. McClish J.C., Ragosta M., Powers E.R., et al. Recent myocardial infarction does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity. Am J Cardiol 93 (2004) 1102-1106
62. Leesar M.A., Abdul-Baki T., Akkus N.I., et al. Use of fractional flow reserve versus stress perfusion scintigraphy after unstable angina. Effect on duration of hospitalization, cost, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 (2003) 1115-1121
63. Potvin J.M., Rodés-Cabau J., Bertrand O.F., et al. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve measurements to defer revascularization in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris, non-ST-elevation and ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, or atypical chest pain. Am J Cardiol 98 (2006) 289-297
64. Fischer J.J., Wang X.Q., Samady H., et al. Outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes and moderate lesions undergoing deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve assessment. Cath Cardiovasc Interv 68 (2006) 544-548